Skip to main content

One Way to Measure How Much Second Best “Second Best” is

  • Chapter
Economic Theory, Dynamics and Markets

Part of the book series: Research Monographs in Japan-U.S. Business & Economics ((JUSB,volume 5))

  • 269 Accesses

Abstract

A democracy chooses to spend a fraction of its real GDP on some public good(s). It can finance that expenditure by excise taxes. When I buy a book in the store, I pay a positive excise tax; if I buy it on the web from Amazon.com, that involves no tax. Such an unbalanced pattern of taxing can add avoidable deadweight loss to the irreducible real cost of the public good. How can we get a measure of the deadweight loss involved in a specified “second-best” scenario?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Auspitz, Rudolf and Richard Lieben. 1889. Untersuchungen über die Theorie des Preises. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Abram. 1936. “Real Income, Expenditure Proportionality and Frisch’s ‘New Methods of Measuring Marginal Utility’,” Review of Economic Studies, 4:33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Abram 1938. “A Reformation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52:310–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Abram 1973. “On Monopoly Welfare Losses,” American Economic Review, 63:853–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Abram 1979. “Consumer’s and Producer’s Surplus and General Equilibrium,” in H. Greenfield, et al., eds., Theory for Economic Efficiency: Essays in Honor of Abba P. Lerner. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Abram 1980. “Consumer’s Surplus and Income Redistribution,” Journal of Public Economics, 14:31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramér, Gabriel. 1728. As discussed in I. Todhunter, History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability, 1949. New York: Chelsea. Page 220 gives a good account.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, Gerard. 1951. “The coefficient of resource utilization,” Econometrica 19:273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, Erwin. 1976. “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers,” Journal of Econometrics, 4:115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A.C. 1954. “Monopoly and Resource Allocation,” American Economic Review, 44:77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John R. 1956. A Revision of Demand Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, Harold. 1938. “The General Welfare in Relation to Problems of Taxation and of Railway and Utility Rates,” Econometrica, 6:242–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, William Stanley. 1871. The Theory of Political Economy. Pelican Classics edn., ed. R.D. Collison Black Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Margaret F.W. 1939. “The excess burden of indirect taxation,” Review of Economic Studies, 6:226–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawamata, Kunio. 1974. “Price Distortion and Potential Welfare,” Econometrica, 42:435–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, Harvey. 1966. “Allocative Efficiency vs. ‘X-Efficiency’,” American Economic Review, 56:392–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Alfred. 1890. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Lionel. 1957. “Demand Theory Without a Utility Index,” Review of Economic Studies, 24:185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John S., 1848. Principles of Political Economy, with some of their applications to Social Philosophy. Two volumes. London: John W. Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, Arthur C. 1928. A Study in Public Finance. London: Macmillan, 3rd edition, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, Frank. 1927. “A contribution to the theory of taxation,” Economic Journal, 37:47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. 1947, 1983. Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. 1948. ECONOMICS. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. 1972. “Unification Theorem for the Two Basic Dualities of Homothetic Demand Theory,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 69:2673–2674. Reproduced as Chapter 212 in The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Vol. 4. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. and Swamy, S. 1973. “Invariant Economic Index Numbers and Canonical Duality: Survey and Synthesis,” American Economic Review, 64:566–593. Reproduced as Chapter 209 in The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Vol. 4. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. 1974. “Complementarity: An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory,” Journal of Economic Literature, 12:1255–1289. Reproduced as Chapter 208 in The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Vol. 4. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. 1982. “A Chapter in the History of Ramsey’s Optimal Feasible Taxation and Optimal Public Utility Prices,” in S. Andersen, et al., eds., Economic Essays in Honour of Jørgen H. Gelting. Copenhagen: The Danish Economic Association. Reproduced as Chapter 296 in The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Vol. 5. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. 1997. “Proof by Certainty Equivalents that Diversification-Across-Time Does Worse, Risk Corrected, than Diversification-Throughout-Time,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14:129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, David. 1960. “The Burden of Monopoly,” Journal of Political Economy, 68:627–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, Ronald. 1953. Cost and Production Functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Samuelson, P.A. (2001). One Way to Measure How Much Second Best “Second Best” is. In: Negishi, T., Ramachandran, R.V., Mino, K. (eds) Economic Theory, Dynamics and Markets. Research Monographs in Japan-U.S. Business & Economics, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1677-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1677-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5673-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1677-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics