Abstract
Most regulated industries undergoing deregulation are capital intensive. In the existing cost-of-service regulatory framework, the primary concern is that guaranteed a competitive return on capital, the regulated firm has insufficient incentive to be cost efficient. In deregulating firms in such industries the return on capital is permitted to vary directly with the firm’s performance. Firms that restrain costs and increase revenue can earn higher profits, while those that fail to do so see profits fall below levels assured under the prior regulatory regime. The assumptions in deregulating such industries are that the affected firm can control the bulk of its costs, can make decisions with little remaining governmental oversight, and can use high-powered performance pay incentive systems to encourage profit maximization. In addition, it is assumed that regulatory barriers will eventually disappear, allowing for open markets and free competition.
The authors appreciate helpful comments from Don Develin, Andy German, John Leeth, Maura Robinson, and Ed Ward, and computational assistance from Timothy Gill.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barr, Stephen. 2000. “Sorting Out Mail’s Place in Internet Age.” The Washington Post (January 24): Al.
Braeutigam, Ronald R. and John C. Panzer. 1993. “Effects of the Change from Rate-of-Return to Price-Cap Regulation.” American Economic Review 83 (May): 191–198.
Braeutigam, Ronald R. 1989. “Optimal Policies for Natural Monopolies.” In Richard Schmalensee and Robert Willig, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization. Volume 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Hirsch, Barry T., Wachter, Michael L., and Gillula, James W. 1999. “Postal Service Compensation and the Comparability Standard.” Research in Labor Economics, 18: 243–79.
Hwang, Hae-shin, Reed, W. Robert, and Hubbard, Carlton. 1992. “Compensating Wage Differentials and Unobserved Productivity.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (Aug): 835–58.
Kwoka, John E. 2000. “Price Caps for Postal Services.” Paper presented at the American Economic Association Meetings, Boston (January).
Miller, Ann R., Treiman, Donald J., Cain, Pamela S., and Roos, Patricia A., eds. 1980. Work, Jobs, and Occupations: A Critical Review of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Final Report to the U.S. Department of Labor by the Committee on Occupational Classification and Analysis. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Peoples, James. 1998. “Deregulation and the Labor Market.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (Summer): 111– 30.
Wachter, Michael L., Hirsch, Barry T. and Gillula, James W. 1999. “Current Evidence on the Comparability of U.S. Postal Service Wages and Benefits to the Private Sector,” Report prepared for the U.S. Postal Service.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wachter, M.L., Hirsch, B.T., Gillula, J.W. (2001). Difficulties of Deregulation When Wage Costs are the Major Cost. In: Crew, M.A., Kleindorfer, P.R. (eds) Future Directions in Postal Reform. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 38. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1671-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1671-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5670-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1671-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive