Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter illustrates the use of the AHP for selecting the most appropriate bridge design in two different applications. The one recommended in the second application coincides with the decision that was actually made, demonstrating that the exclusion of an important, but hard to perceive actor, can alter the final decision. In this example we learn that decision making is not simply including multiple criteria in the decision, but more importantly the diverse people or groups who influence the outcome because of their own purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 9.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Leonhardt, F. and W. Zelbner, “Past, Present & Future of Cable-Stayed Bridges,” chapter in Cable-Stayed Bridges, Recent Development and Their Future, M. Ito et al (Editors) Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tang, M.C., “Cable-Stayed Bridges in North America,” chapter in Cable-Stayed Bridges, Recent Development and Their Future, M. Ito et al (Editors) Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. O’Connor, C., Design of Bridge Superstructures, Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Phase I: Airport busway/Wabash Alternative Analysis Draft Environmental Impact Statement Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Prepared by U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with Federal Highway Administration, United States Coast Guard, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and Port Authority of Allegheny County, September 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G. (2001). The Selection of a Bridge. In: Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 34. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5667-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1665-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics