E-Commerce Recommendation Applications



Recommender systems are being used by an ever-increasing number of E-commerce sites to help consumers find products to purchase. What started as a novelty has turned into a serious business tool. Recommender systems use product knowledge—either hand-coded knowledge provided by experts or “mined” knowledge learned from the behavior of consumers—to guide consumers through the often-overwhelming task of locating products they will like. In this article we present an explanation of how recommender systems are related to some traditional database analysis techniques. We examine how recommender systems help E-commerce sites increase sales and analyze the recommender systems at six market-leading sites. Based on these examples, we create a taxonomy of recommender systems, including the inputs required from the consumers, the additional knowledge required from the database, the ways the recommendations are presented to consumers, the technologies used to create the recommendations, and the level of personalization of the recommendations. We identify five commonly used E-commerce recommender application models, describe several open research problems in the field of recommender systems, and examine privacy implications of recommender systems technology.


electronic commerce recommender systems personalization customer loyalty cross-sell up-sell mass customization privacy data mining database marketing user interface 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., and Swami, A. 1993. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD-93, pp. 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avery, C, Resnick, P., and Zeckhauser, R. 1999. The market for evaluations. American Economic Review, 89(3):564–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balabanovic, M. and Shoham, Y. 1997. Fab: Content-based, collaborative recommendation. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu, C, Hirsh, H., and Cohen, W. 1998. Recommendation as classification: Using social and content-based information in recommendation. In Proceedings of the 1998 National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98), pp. 714–720.Google Scholar
  5. Breese, J., Heckerman, D., and Kadie, C. 1998. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-98), pp. 43–52.Google Scholar
  6. Good, N., Schafer, J.B., Konstan, J.A., Borchers, A., Sarwar, B., Herlocker, J., and Riedl, J. 1999. Combining collaborative filtering with personal agents for better recommendations. In Proceedings of AAAI-99, AAAI Press, pp. 439–446.Google Scholar
  7. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J.A., Borchers, A., and Riedl, J. 1999. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of SIGIR’99, pp. 230–237.Google Scholar
  8. Hill, W., Stead, L., Rosenstein, M, and Furnas, G. 1995. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. In Proceedings of ACM CHI’95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 194–201.Google Scholar
  9. Konstan, J.A., Miller, B., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J., Gordon, L., and Riedl, J. 1997. GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mani, D.R., Drew, J., Betz, A., and Datta, P. 1999. Statistics and data mining techniques for lifetime value modeling. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Peppers, D. and Rogers, M. 1997. The One to One Future: Building Relationships One Customer at a Time. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  12. Pine II, B.J. 1993. Mass Customization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  13. Pine II, B.J. and Gilmore, J.H. 1999. The Experience Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  14. Pine II, B.J., Peppers, D., and Rogers, M. 1995. Do you want to keep your customers forever? Harvard Business School Review, 1995(2): 103–114.Google Scholar
  15. Reichheld, F. 1993. Loyalty-based management. Harvard Business School Review, 1993(2):64–73.Google Scholar
  16. Reichheld, F. and Sasser, W.E. 1990. Zero defections: Quality comes to services. Harvard Business School Review, 1990(5):105–111.Google Scholar
  17. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., and Riedl, J. 1994. Grouplens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of ACM CSCW’94 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 175–186.Google Scholar
  18. Salton, G. 1968. Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Sarwar, B., Konstan, J.A., Borchers, A., Herlocker, J., Miller, B., and Riedl, J. 1998. Using filtering agents to improve prediction quality in the grouplens research collaborative filtering system. In Proceedings of 1998 Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work.Google Scholar
  20. Schafer, J.B., Konstan, J.A., and Riedl, J. 1999. Recommender Systems in E-Commerce. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-99), pp. 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shardanand, U. and Maes, P. 1995. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating “word of mouth.” In Proceedings of ACM CHF95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 210–217.Google Scholar
  22. Shneiderman, B. 1997. Direct manipulation for comprehensible, predictable, and controllable user interfaces. In Proceedings of IUI97,1997 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Orlando, FL, January 6–9, 1997, pp. 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wolf, J., Aggarwal, C, Wu, K-L., and Yu, P. 1999. Horting hatches an egg: A new graph-theoretic approach to collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GroupLens Research Project, Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations