Skip to main content

Innovative Labor and Intellectual Property Market in the Semiconductor Industry

  • Chapter
Technology and Markets for Knowledge

Part of the book series: Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation ((ESTI,volume 22))

  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

Anyone wishing to outline the strategic characteristics of the semiconductor industry must look for the common point between those industries which currently lead worldwide growth. In fact, semiconductors act as intermediary products in a growing number of applications (automotive, telecommunications, computers, consumer electronics) which represent a significant part of the global worldwide exchanges,as shown in table 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antonelli, Cristiano, The Microdynamics of Technological Change. London and New York: Routledge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora A., Fosfuri A., Gambardella A. Markets for Technology (Why do we see them, why don’t we see more off them, and why we should care). Working Paper N¡ã99–17, Université Carlos III de Madrid. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora A., Gambardella A. The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Research Policy 1994; 23:523–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora A. Gambardella A. Rullani E. Division of Labour and the Locus of Inventive Activity. Journal of Management and Governance 1997; 1:123–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arundel A., Kabla I. What percentage of innovations are patented ? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy 1998; 27:127–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athreye S. M. On Markets in Knowledge. Working Paper N¡ã 83, ESRC. March 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan T., Malerba F. The Computer Industry. CCC Matrix project. Cape Cod (MA). 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsvold B.G., Burgujian R.V., Pratt W.H. Protecting intellectual property: copyrights. Silicon Strategies 1998; June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W.M., Klepper S. Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics 1996; 78:232–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, Michael A. Japan’s Software Factories. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauvin, Jean-Philippe, Les semi-conducteurs. Paris: Cyclope Economica, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bandt J., Ravix J.L., Romani P.M. Allyn Young: une approche de la dynamique industrielle. Revue Française d’Economie 1990; 5:85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Litterature 1988; 26:1120–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duysters, Gert, The dynamics of technical innovation - The evolution and development of information technology. Cheltenham: Elgar, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez I. H., Fernandez D. S. Building a legally sound intellectual property portfolio. Silicon Strategies 1998; June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty M.T. Field research on the link between technological innovation and growth: evidence from the international semiconductor industry. American Economic Review, Papers & Proceedings 1984; 74:67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray D. Standardisation et concurrence: des relations ambivalentes. Revue d’Economie Industrielle 1993; 63:84–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella A., Torrisi S. Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets ? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy 1998; 27:445–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geneau De Lamarlière, Isabelle. “Les déterminants des localisations dans l’industrie des semi-conducteurs.” In La dynamique spatiale de l’économie contemporaine, George B. Benko, ed. Paris: Editions de l’Espace Européen, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandstrand O., Patel P., Pavitt K. Multi-technology Corporations: Why they have `distributed’ rather than `distinctive core’ competencies. California Management Review 1997; 39:8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindley P. C., Teece D. J. Managing Intellectual Capital: Licencing and Cross-Licencing in Semiconductors and Electronics. California Management Review 1997; 39:8–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber H. The yield factor and the learning curve in semiconductor production. Applied Economics 1994; 26:837–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F.A. Economics and Knowledge, Presidential address delivered before the London Economic Club; November 10 1936, Reprinted from Economica IV 1937: 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodor K. Adopting methods to protect intellectual property from pirates. Silicon Strategies 1998; February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikonicoff R. Nanotubes: vers l’ordinateur microscopique. Science & Vie 2000; 989:130–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation. Status 1995. Mid-Term Report. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois R.N. Capabilities and Vertical disintegration in process technology. Working Paper, University of Connecticut. January 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois R., Robertson P. L. Innovation, Networks, and Vertical Integration. Research Policy 1995; 24:543–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, Richard N., Steinmueller William E. The Evolution of Competitive Advantage in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1947–1996. Report of the CCC Matrix Project, 3`d draft. Cape Cod: 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin R., Klevorick A., Nelson R., Winter S. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 1987; 3:783–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loasby B. J. The organisation of capabilities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1998; 35: 139–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loasby B. J. Transactions Costs and Capabilities. Proceedings of the XIe European Summer School on Industrial Dynamics; 1996 September 12–16; Cargese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall Bengt. A. “Innovation as an Interactive Process from User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation.” In Technical Change and Theory, Giovanni Dosi, ed. London and New York: Pinter Publishers, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luther K., Graml B. Joining Hands in Memory Development. Siemens Review. R&D special 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macher J. T., Mowery D. C., Hodges D. A. Reversal of Fortune ? The recovery of the U.S. semiconductor industry. California Management Review 1998; 41:107–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F., Nelson R., Orsenigo L., Winter S. ‘History-friendly’ models of industry evolution: the computer industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 1999; 8:1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Technological regimes and firm behaviour. Industrial and Corporate Change 1993; 2:45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E. Patents and innovation: an empirical study. Management Science 1986; 32:173–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinotti P. Microelectronics Towards System On Chip. Silicon Strategies Conference; 1998 March 16–17; San Jose (US).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall T. Gartnergroup’s Dataquest Says Worldwide Semiconductor Market Growth Grew nearly 18%. Press Release; 2000 January 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Leod J. A sea change hits the semiconductor industry. Silicon Strategies 1998; June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moati P., Mouhoud E. M. Division cognitive du travail et dynamiques de la localisation industrielle dans l’espace mondial. Proceedings of the International Conference “La connaissance dans la dynamique des organisations productives”; 1995 September 14–15; Aix-en-Provence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, Carl, Principles of Economics. New York: New York University Press, 1981 (Original in German 1871).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller M. How to make Money in IP. Silicon Strategies 1999; May.

    Google Scholar 

  • O.C.D.E. La mesure des activités scientifiques et technologiques - Les données sur les brevets d’invention et leur utilisation comme indicateurs de la science et de la technologie - Manuel Brevets 1994. Working Paper GD(94) 114. Paris: OCDE 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K. Technologies, products and organisations in the innovative firm: what Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn’t. Working Paper, SPRU. May 1998: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn M. Semiconductor Market - Trends & Analysis. Scottish SC Supplier Forum Annual General Meeting; 1999a June 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn M. Semiconductors Market Drivers and profitability. SEMI Fab Management Forum; 1999b April 16; Dresden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichon A. Dossier spécial futur. Science & Vie Micro 1998; 166:58–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quéré, Michel, Ravix Jacques-Laurent. “Proximité et organisation territoriale de l’industrie.” In Approches multiformes de la proximité, Michel Bellet, Thierry Kirat, Christine Largeron, eds.: Hermès, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravix, Jacques-Laurent, Production, Institutions et Organisation de l’Industrie, une contribution ¨¤ la méthode économique. Thèse d’Etat. Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, George. B., Information and Investment, A Study in Working of Competitive Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streissler E. To what extent was the Austrian school marginalist? History of Political Economy 1972; 4:426–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassey G. Standardization in technology-based markets. Research Policy 2000; 29:587–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassey, Gregory, Technology Infrastructure and Competition Position. Northwell: Kluwer, 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teece D. J. Capturing Value From Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets For Know-How, and Intangible Assets. California Management Review 1998; 40:55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel E. The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process. Research Policy 1976; 5:212–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieder A.W. Mapping the Future of Microelectronics. Siemens Review. R&D special 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter S.G. Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1984; 5:287–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Richard.W., “The role of imitable vs inimitable competences in the evolution of the semiconductor industry.” In Dynamics of competence-based competition, Ron Sanchez, Aimé Heene, Howard Thomas, eds. Oxford, New York: Pergamon, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A. A. Rendements croissants et progrès économique. Revue Française d’Economie 1990; 5:85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Attia, R., Davy, I., Rizoulières, R. (2001). Innovative Labor and Intellectual Property Market in the Semiconductor Industry. In: Guilhon, B. (eds) Technology and Markets for Knowledge. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 22. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1605-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1605-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5637-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1605-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics