Abstract
Knowledge is at the heart of organizational forms as it lays the fundamental questions of its production, of its transfer and of its utilization (Lundvall, 1999). The answers to these questions depend on the formulated hypothesis as to properties attributed to knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Alvesson M. Organization as rhetoric: knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle of ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies 1993; 30:997–1016.
Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A. Markets for technology (why do we see them, why don’t we see more of them and why we should care). Working paper 99–17, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 1999.
Arora A, Fosfuri A. Licensing the market for technology. Discussion paper series n¡ã2284, CEPR, 1998.
Arrow KJ. Technical information and industrial structure. Industrial and Corporate Change 1996; 5:645–52.
Arrow, Kenneth. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Ressources for Innovation.” InThe Rate and Direction of Inventive ActivityR Nelson, ed. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1962.
Artus P, Hubert F, Verlé N. “En 1997, les entreprises françaises étaient valorisées normalement: une approche par le Q de Tobin et le capital immatériel”. CDC Marchés 1998; 20:1–13.
Arundel A, Smith K, Patel P, Sirilli G. The futur of innovation measurement in europe. Concepts, problems and pratical directions. STEP group, IDEA Paper Series, 3, 1998.
Autio E. New technology-based firms in innovative networks symplectic and generative impacts. Research policy 1997; 26:263–81.
Blackler F. Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation. Organization Studies 1995; 16/6:1021–46.
Calvert J, Ibana C, Patel P, Pavitt K. “Innovation outputs in european industry: analysis from CIS. ” Part of report submitted to DG XII (Contrat: EIMS 93/52). European Commission, 1996.
Carter Anne, PStructural Change in the American Economy.Cambridge, Massachussetts, 1970.
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. Absorptive capacity: a new prospective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990; 35:128–52.
Coombs R, Battaglia P. Outsourcing of business services and the boundaries of the firms. CRIC Working Paper 5, The University of Manchester, 1998.
Dosi G, Teece DJ, Winter SG. Les fronti¨¨res des entreprises: vers une théorie de la cohérence de la grande entreprise. Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 1990; 51:238–54.
Foray D. “Innovation, connaissance et information: un rapide tour d’horizon.” SéminaireEconomie de l’InformationCommissariat Général du Plan, 1995 novembre 14, Paris.
Gambardella A, Torrisi S. Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets ? Evidence from the electronic industry. Research policy 1998; 27:445–63.
Gilbert RJ, Sunshine SC. Incorporating dynamic efficiency concerns in merger analysis: the use of innovation markets. The Journal of Reprint for Antitrust Law and Economics 1998; XXVIII (2):449–81.
Granstrand O, Patel P, Pavitt K. Multi-technology corporations: why they have “distributed” rather than “distinctive core” competencies. California Management Review 1997; 39:8–25.
Grant RM. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 1996a; 17 (Winter Special Issue): 109–22.
Hayek, FriedrichThe Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1988.
Hayek, FriedrichThe Constitution of Liberty.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
Hayek, Friedrich. “Competition as a Discovery Process.” InNew Studies of Philosophy Politics Economics and the History of IdeasChicago of University Press, 1978.
Jorde TM, Teece DJ. Innovation and cooperation:implications for competition and antitrust. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1990; 4:75–96.
Kline, S, Rosenberg N. “An Overview of Innovation.” InThe Positive Sun Strategy.Rosenberg N and Landau R, eds., Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986.
Loasby B. The organization of capabilities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1998; 35:139–60
Lundvall, Bengt-Ake. “What Constitutes the Knowledge Base in the so-called Knowledge-Based Economy.” InIndicateurs Prospectifs de Science et de TechnologieRapport final dans le cadre du contrat n¡ã ERBRIST ¡ª CT 970013 entre le CEFI et la DG XII, Commission Européenne: Cefi, 2000.
Mang PY. Exploiting innovation options: an empirical analysis of R&D intensive firms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1998; 35:229–42
Maskell P, Marmberg A. Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1999; 23:167–85.
Moatti P, Mouhoud EM. Connaissances, logiques productives et modes de division du travail: une contribution ¨¤ la réflexion sur les mécanismes d’exclusion. Revue d’ Intelligence Economique 1998; 2:31–42.
Nachum L. Measuring the productivity of professional services: a case study of swedish management consulting firms. Working paper series, ESRC Centre for Business Research, WP 120, University of Cambridge, 1998.
Nelson, Richard R, Sidney G, WinterAn Evolutionnary Theory of Economic Change.The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts, and London, England, 1982.
Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 1994; 5:14–37.
Polanyi, MichaelThe Tacit Dimension. London, Routledge & Kegan, 1966. Richardson GB. Production,planning and prices, Druid Working Paper, 98–27, 1998.
Rosenberg, NathanInside the Black Box: Technology and Economics.Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Teece DJ. Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review 1998; 40:55–79.
Thévenot L. Equilibre et rationalité dans un univers complexe. Revue Economique (Special Issue) 1989; 40:147–97.
Winter, Sidney G. “Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets.” In The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, David J Teece, ed. Ballinger : Cambridge, MA, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guilhon, B. (2001). How to Characterize Markets for Knowledge ?. In: Guilhon, B. (eds) Technology and Markets for Knowledge. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 22. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1605-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1605-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5637-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1605-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive