Overview of Fracture Mechanics and Failure Prevention

  • Bahram Farahmand

Abstract

Between 1930 and 1950, a series of failures of several large structures, including pressure vessels, storage tanks, ships, gas pipe lines, bridges, dams and many welded parts alarmed government regulators search for more effective ways to prevent structural failures [1,2]. Most of the observed failures occurred under operating cyclic stress well below the yield value of the material, in a catastrophic manner, with high velocities and little or no plastic deformation. In-depth scientific investigation into the nature of these failures indicated that poor structural design practices (the presence of stress concentrations), insufficient material fracture toughness, residual stresses, lack of inspection, unaccounted variation in load spectrum and presence of corrosive environment, can each contribute to an accelerated crack growth that may result in catastrophic failure and possible loss of life. Structural failure prevention and potential savings can be obtained by focusing attention on a few major areas which have material and structural dependency. Tighter control over material properties (such as static strength and fracture toughness) throughout the manufacturing and assembly phases of the hardware, is a major factor, which contributes to prevention of structural failures

Keywords

Fatigue Titanium Porosity Welding Steam 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. R. Parker, “Brittle Behavior of Engineering Structures,” John Wiley & Sons, 1957Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. P. Reed, J. H. Smith, B. W. Christ, “The Economic Effect of Fracture in the United States,” SP 647–1, NBS, March 1983Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Farahmand, “Static and Fracture Mechanics Properties of 2219-T6, VPPA Weld,” Boeing, Huntington Beach, California, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. R. Higgins, “Bolted Joints Found Better Under Fatigue, “Engineering News-Record, Vol. 147, pp. 35–36, Aug. 2, 1951.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. A. Walker and G. Meyer, “Design Recommendations for Minimizing Fatigue in Bolts,”  Machine Design, Vol. 38, No 21, 15 Sep. 1966, pp. 182–186Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fatigue Technology Inc. (FTI), Extending the Fatigue Life of Metal Structures Material Testing, Seattle Washington USA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. S. Manson, “Metal Fatigue Damage- Mechanism, Detection, Avoidance, and Repair,” STP 495, 1971, pp. 5–57.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    “Wohler’s Experiments on the Strength of Metals,” Engineering, August 23, 1967, p. 160.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. A. Miner, “Cumulative Damage in Fatigue,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Trans. ASTM, Vol. 12, September 1945, pp. A-159–164.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mil-Handbook 5, Department of Defence, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. O. Fuchs and R.I Stephens, “Metals Fatigue in Engineering,” Wiley interscience Publication, 1980, Ch.11.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Neuber, “Theory of Stress Concentration for Shear-Strained Prismatical Bodies with Arbitrary Non-linear Stress-Strain Law, Trans., ASME, Appl. Mech., December 1961, pp 544.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. C. Juvinall, “Supplement to Engineering Considerations of Stress, Stain, and Strength,” McGraw-Hill, 1967.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morrow, “Cyclic Plastic Strain Energy and Fatigue of Metals,” Internal Friction, Damping, and Cyclic Plasticity, ASTM STP 378, 1965, p. 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. W. Smith, M. H. Hirschberg, and S. S. Manson, “Fatigue Behavior of Materials Under Strain Cycling in Low and Intermidiate Life Range,” NASA, TN D-1574, April 1963.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. H. Basquin, “The Exponential Law of Endurance Tests,” Proc. ASTM. Vol. 10, Part II, 1910, p. 625.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. F. Tavernelli and L. F. Coffin, Jr., “Experimental Support for Generalized Equation Predicting Low Cycle Fatigue,” Trans. ASME, J. Basic Eng., Vol. 84, No. 4, Dec. 1962, p. 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. S. Manson, discussion of reference 23, Trans. ASME J. Basic Eng., Vol. 84, No. 4, Dec. 1962, p. 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Endo and JoDean Morrow, “Cyclic Stress-Strain and Fatigue Behavior of Representative Aircraft, “Journal of Material, Vol. 4, No. 1, March, 1969, pp. 159–175.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. A. Graham, Ed., Fatigue Design Handbook, SAE, 1968.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. E. Peterson, Materials Research and Standards, MTRSA, Vol. 3, No. 2, Feb. 1963Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morrow, JoDean and Johnson, T. A., Material Reasearch and Standards, MTRSA, Vol. 5, No. 1, Jan. 1965Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. H. Crews, Jr., and H. F. Hardrath, Experimental Mechanics, EXMCA, Vol. 6, No. 6,1966, p. 313Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. A. Griffith, “The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids,” Philos. Trans., R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A., Vol. 221, 1920.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. E. Inglis, “Structure in a Plate due to Presence of Cracks and Sharp Corners,” Trans. Inst. Naval Architects London, Vol. 60, p. 219, March, 1913.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. R. Irwin, “Fracture Dynamics,” Fracture of Metals, ASM, 1948, pp. 147–166Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. Orowan, “Fracture and Strength of Solids,” Rep. Prog. Physics, Vol. 12, 1949, pp. 185–232ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. R. Irwin, “Analysis of Stress and Strains Near the End of a Crack Traversing a Plate,” Trans. ASME, J. Appl. Mech. Vol. 24, 1957, p. 361.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    G. R. Irwin, Fracture, Handbuch der Physik, VI, pp. 551–590, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1958.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. S. Dugdale, “Yielding of Steel Sheets Containing Slits,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 8, 1960, pp. 100–108ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fatigue crack Growth Computer Programing, “NASA/FLAGRO, Version 3.0,”JSC-22267.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    P. C. Paris, M. P. Gomez and W. E. Anderson, A Rational Analytic Theory of Fatigue, Trend Engng Univ. Wash., 13 (1), 1961, pp. 9–14.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. C. Newman Jr., “A Crack Opening Stress Equation for Fatigue Crack Growth,” International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 24, No. 3, March 1984, pp. R131–R135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. R. Rice, “A Path Independent Integral and Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Nothes and Crack,” Jouranal of Applied MechanicsVol. 35, 1968, pp. 379–386.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. A. Wells, “Application of Fracture Mechanics at and Beyond General Yielding, British Welding Research Ass. Rep. March 13, 1963Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. W. Hutchinson, “Singular Behavior at the End of Tensile Crack in a Hardening Material,” Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids,” Vol. 16, No. 1, 1968, pp. 13–31ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    F.M. Burdekin, and D.E.W Stone, “The Crack Opening Displacement to Fracture Mechanics in Yielding Materials,” J. Starin Analysis, 1 (1966) pp. 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    B. Farahmand, “Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics of High Risk Parts,” Chapman & Hall, Ch. 5.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    B. Farahmand, “Fracture Mechanics Manual,” Boeing Company, R-35-SSC, 1990, pp. Ch. 2.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    W. E. Schall, “Non-Destructive Testing,” The Machinery Publishing Co., 1968.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Classroom Training Handbook, “Non-Destructive Testing, Liquid Penetrant,” General Dynamics, Convair Division.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    McMaster, R.C., Ed., Liquid Penetrant Tests, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 2nd Edition, Vol. 2, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, 1982.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Classroom Training Handbook, “Non-Destructive Testing, Magnetic Particle,” General Dynamics, Convair Division.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schmidt, J.T., Skeie, K., Technical Eds., Maclntire, P., Ed., Magnetic Particle Testing, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 2nd Edition, Vol. 6, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, 1989.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Classroom Training Handbook, “Non-Destructive Testing, Eddy Current,” General Dynamics, Convair Division.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    R. W. Smilie, “Nondestructive Testing, Ultrasonic,” NASA/General Dynamics, PH Division, Inc.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Birks, A.S., Green, R.E., Jr., Technical Eds., Maclntire, P., Ed., Ultrasonic Testing, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 2nd Edition, Vol. 7, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, 1991.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bryant, L.E., Technical Ed., Maclntire, P., Ed., Radiography and Radiation Testing, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 2nd Edition, Vol. 3, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bahram Farahmand

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations