Skip to main content

Modeling the Beliefs of other Agents

Achieving Mutuality

  • Chapter
Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science ((SECS,volume 597))

Abstract

This paper develops a formalism combining elements of epistemic and nonmonotonic logic, which is applied to the general topic of modeling the attitudes of other agents, and in particular to the problem of achieving mutuality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aumann, R. J. (1976). Agreeing to disagree. Annals of Statistics, 4(6):1236–1239.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, K. J. (1988). Three views of common knowledge. In Vardi, M. Y., editor, Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, pages 365–379, Los Altos, California. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buvač, S. and Mason, I. (1993). Propositional logic of context. In Fikes, R. and Lehnert, W., editors, Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 412–419, Menlo Park, California. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. (1992). Arenas of Language Use. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. and Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Joshi, A., Webber, B., and Sag, I., editors, Linguistics Structure and Discourse Setting, pages 10–63. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. and Schober, M. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 24:259–294. Republished in Clark, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, R., Halpern, J. Y., Moses, Y., and Vardi, M. Y. (1995). Reasoning about Knowledge. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K. (1970). Propositional quantifiers in modal logic. Theoria, 36:336–346.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. V. (1991). Contexts: a formalization and some applications. Technical Report STAN-CS-91-1399, Stanford Computer Science Department, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J. Y. and Lakemeyer, G. (1996). Multi-agent only knowing. In Shoham, Y., editor, Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference (TARK 1996), pages 251–265. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, P. (1997). On the complexity of propositional quantification in intuitionistic logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 62(2):529–544.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1965). A semantical analysis of modal logic II: Non-normal propositional calculi. In Henkin, L. and Tarski, A., editors, The Theory of Models, pages 206–220. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon, E. (1957). New foundations for Lewis modal systems. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 22(2):176–186.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. K. (1969). Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifschitz, V. (1986). Pointwise circumscription. In Kehler, T. and Rosenschein, S., editors, Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 406–410, Los Altos, California. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (1980). Circumscription: A form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13:27–39.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, A. M. and Wainer, J. (1996). Preferential multi-agent nonmonotonic logics. In Aiello, L. C., Doyle, J., and Shapiro, S., editors, KR′96: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 446–452. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, L. (1990). A theory of multiple agent nonmonotonic reasoning. In Dietterich, T. and Swartout, W., editors, Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 538–544, Menlo Park, CA. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, C. D. (1996). Miscommunication. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh, R. (1991). Monotonie and nonmonotonic logics of knowledge. Fundamenta Informaticae, 15(3–4):255–274.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, S. (1972). Meaning. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. C. (1975). Pragmatic presuppositions. In Munitz, M. K. and Unger, P., editors, Semantics and Philosophy. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R. H. (1990). Propagating epistemic coordination through mutual defaults I. In Parikh, R., editor, Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge: Proceedings of the Third Conference (TARK 1990), pages 29–39, Los Altos, California. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R. H. (1998). Intra-agent modality and nonmonotonic epistemic logic. In Gilboa, I., editor, Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference (TARK 1998), pages 57–69, San Francisco, California. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, J. (1993). Epistemic extension of propositional preference logics. In Bajcsy, R., editor, Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 382–387, San Mateo, California. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomason, R.H. (2000). Modeling the Beliefs of other Agents. In: Minker, J. (eds) Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 597. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1567-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1567-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5618-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1567-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics