Skip to main content

Agricultural Knowledge Systems: Issues of Accountability

  • Chapter
Knowledge Generation and Technical Change

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 19))

  • 165 Accesses

Abstract

Formal knowledge creation is a critical part of food systems. It occurs in various social spaces: the state (public sector), the market (for-profit private sector), and civil society (formal and informal groups of citizens). These sectors can overlap in a variety of ways. Further, they differ in terms of accountability. They have different stakeholders, different expectations, and different sanctions where those expectations are not met. In this chapter, I discuss the accountability of each of these “intellectual spaces”. First, I present the general situation for each of the three separate spaces, which impacts the degree to which accountability can be achieved and the mechanisms chosen to meet those goals within the knowledge systems. Then I present expectations for knowledge systems that emerge from the different spaces in terms of societal resource stocks and flows: human, social, natural and financial. Finally, I discuss the relations among the sectors in terms of accountability, focussing on what civil society might expect from the market and the state in terms of knowledge systems. The focus is on publicly supported agricultural knowledge systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bird, E.A.R., G. L. Bultena, and J. C. Gardner (eds.). 1995. Planting the Future: Developing an Agriculture that Sustains Land and Community. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloome, P. 1993. Privatization Lessons for U.S. Extension Learned from New Zealand and Tasmania. Journal of Extension 31: 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, M. 1994. Civil Society and Political Transition in Africa. IRD Reports 11 (6).

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, W. P. 1995. Cultivating Congress: Constituents, Issues, and Interests in Agricultural Policy Making. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, J. 1993. Changing Foundations for Government Support of Agricultural Extension in Economically Developed Countries. Sociologia Ruralis 33: 336–347]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., A. Pacey, and L.A. Thrupp. 1989. Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research. IT Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe, M. B. and C. B. Flora. 1998. Gendered Elements of the Sustainable Agriculture Paradigm. Rural Sociology 63: 372–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, L. (ed.). 1992. On-Farm Research and Extension for Agricultural Sustainability. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois College of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, D. and R. Thompson. 1998. Cooperating with Farmers to Promote Sustainable Agriculture in Iowa. Ames, IA Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasteyer, S. and C. Butler Flora. 2000. Measuring PPM with Tennis Shoes: Science and Locally Meaningful Indicators of Environmental Quality. Society and Natural Resources 13: 589–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanein, N. and J. R. Kloppenburg, Jr. 1995. Where the Grass Grows Again: Knowledge Exchange in the Sustainable Agriculture Movement. Rural Sociology. 60: 721–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg Commission on the Future of Land Grant Universities. 1999. Returning to Our Roots: The Engaged Institution. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg Foundation. 1995. Food Systems Professions Education Overview and Project Synopses of Phase I: Vision Building. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg Foundation. 1997. IFS Insights: Cultivating Agriculture’s Future Through Collaboration. Battle Creek, MI: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg Foundation. 1999. Visions of Change in Higher Education. Battle Creek, MI: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, Jr., J. 1991. Social theory and the de/reconstruction of agricultural science: local knowledge for sustainable agriculture. Rural Sociology 56: 519–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroese, R. and C. Butler Flora. 1993. Building a Grass Roots Institution to Implement Low External Input and Sustainable Agriculture: The Stewardship Farming Experience. In C. Alders, B. [Incomplete]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroma, M. and C. Butler Flora. forthcoming. Farmer Research as Cognitive Process: An Exploratory Study of SARE-Funded Projects in the North Central Region. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort and L. van Valdhurzen (eds.) Linking with Farmers: Networking for Low External Input and Sustainable Agriculture. London: Intermediate Technology Publication: 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. 1997. Measuring Profitability. White Bear, MN: Land Stewardship Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meares, A. 1997. Making the Transition from Conventional to Sustainable Agriculture: Gender, Social Movement Participation, and Quality of Life on the Family Farm. Rural Sociology 62: 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, S. 1998. Extension Work as Public Work: Reconsidering Cooperative Extension’s Civic Mission. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. 1995. Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy. 6: 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. 1998. The distribution of social capital across time and space in contemporary America. Keynote address Social Capital, Individuals, and Society: American Communities in the 21st Century, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, R.E., and R.H. Booth. 1982. Farmer-back-to-farmer: a model for generating acceptable agricultural technology. Agricultural Administration 11:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savory, A. and J. Butterfield. 1999. Holistic Management: A New Framework for Decision Making. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flora, C.B. (2001). Agricultural Knowledge Systems: Issues of Accountability. In: Wolf, S.A., Zilberman, D. (eds) Knowledge Generation and Technical Change. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 19. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1499-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1499-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5584-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1499-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics