Abstract
During the final days of putting together this chapter, two images kept running through our minds at the Center for Youth Development and Policy Research (the Center). The first was of a meeting two years ago with a group of foundations in one city interested in after-school programming and, in particular, the Center staff’s role in the development of Beacon Schools. As the meeting progressed, it became clear that these funders were primarily interested in expanding funding support to after-school programs. They were very interested in tying their additional funding support to demonstrable youth and program outcomes. This discussion was positive and productive until the funders announced the amount of money they envisioned granting to each program … $25,000–$25,000 to expand the number of young people served by each program, to expand program hours to all current and newly enrolled youth, and to show such outcomes as improved school attendance and reading scores. That meeting was the first time the Center used the following three questions to add a dose of reality to situations in which serious groups of people state their interest in doing “something” for children and youth after school:
-
1.
At what age would you leave a young person home alone after school from 3 P.M. to 7 P.M.?
-
2.
How much would you spend to take care of one young person for one day for four hours from 3 P.M. to 7 P.M.?
-
3.
How many hours of structured activities would you want for a young person for one week during the school year (not counting time in school)?
Keywords
- Public Investment
- Youth Development
- Positive Youth Development
- National League
- Youth Development Program
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Slowly, (General Colin) Powell is coming around to the view that government, too, must do more, not in—God forbid—running programs but in helping to fund the nonprofits we already know work. While avoiding the usual Washington scramble for money, he admits that the pending $200 billion-plus transportation bill got him thinking. Youth development programs are “as good a place to invest as highways in Kansas,” he says. So why not more public investment? (“Long after the Trumpets,” Newsweek, May 11, 1998)
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alter, Jonathan 1998 “Long After the Trumpets.” Newsweek, May 11, p. 41.
The Annie E. Casey Foundation 1998 Kids Count Data Book. Baltimore: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Carnegie Corporation of New York 1992 A Matter of Time: Risk and Opportunity in the Nonschool Hours. New York: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.
Cornerstone Consulting 1997 The Cost of Doing the Teen Outreach Program—Sample Case Study from the Field: Roanoke, Virginia. Houston: Cornerstone Consulting.
Dryfoos, Joy G.1998 Safe Passage: Making It through Adolescence in a Risky Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Feister, L., E.R. Reisner, C. Marzke, and A.M. Castle 1999 Executive Summary of the Preliminary Report of Beating the Odds from 3–6pm: Evaluation Results from the TASC After-School Program’s First Year. Washington, D.C.: Policy Studies Associates.
Gold, Steven, and Deborah Ellwood1994 Spending and Revenue For Children’s Programs. Washington, D.C.: The Finance Project.
Johnson, Dirk 1998 “When Money Is Everything, Except Hers.” New York Times, October 14, p. A1.
Lopez, Naomi1998 The State of Children: What Parents Should Know about Government’s Efforts to Assist Children. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.
Motley, Isolde 1998 Life, July, Vol. 21, Issue 8, p. 10.
National League of Cities 1997 New Directions for Cities, Families, and Children: Financing Municipal Policies and Programs for Children and Youth. Washington, D.C.: National League of Cities.
Pittman, Karen J., Ray O’Brien, and Mary Kimball1993 Youth Development and Resiliency Research: Making Connections to Substance Abuse Prevention. New York: Center for Youth Development and Policy Research/Academy for Educational Development.
Pittman, Karen J., and Shepherd Zeldin1994 From Deterrence to Development: Putting Programs for Young African-American Males in Perspective. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
Stern, Leonard W.1992 Funding Patterns of Nonprofit Organizations That Provide Youth Development Services: An Exploratory Study. A report prepared for the Task Force on Youth Development and Community Programs of the Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.
Tierney, Joseph P., and Jean Baldwin Grossman, with Nancy L. Resch 1995 Making a Difference: An Impact Study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Warren, Constancia, with Prudence Brown, and Nicolas Freudenberg 1999 Evaluation of the New York City Beacons—Summary of Phase I Findings. New York: Academy for Educational Development, Inc., with Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago and Hunter College Center on AIDS, Drugs and Community Health.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newman, R.P., Smith, S.M., Murphy, R. (2001). A Matter of Money: The Cost and Financing of Youth Development. In: Benson, P.L., Pittman, K.J. (eds) Trends in Youth Development. Outreach Scholarship, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1459-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1459-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5564-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1459-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive