Skip to main content
  • 87 Accesses

Abstract

At the time of the American founding, “commerce” (or, more specifically, “interstate commerce”) was a far more rudimentary concept than we understand it to be today. The most prevalent form of interstate commerce was waterborne commerce; thus, early court cases and legislative action dealt primarily with trade on navigable waters or with port and harbor regulation issues.2 Disputes also arose over agricultural trade, bridge and highway policy, taxation of goods in transit, and routine border controversies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Annett, Alex F. (1997, October 31) “Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: How Congress Can Increase Property Owners’ Access to Justice.” Heritage Foundation F. Y. I. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, Saba. (1997) “Virtual Taxation: State Taxation of Internet and On-line Sales.” 24 Florida State University Law Review 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bany, John S. (1998, May I) “Federalism and Financial Services.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, David (1992, October 5) “Equal Protection for Economic Liberty: Is the Court Ready” Cato Institute Policy Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork, Robert H. (1991, July) “Federalism and Federal Regulation: The Case of Product Labeling.” Washington Legal Foundation, Critical Legal Issues, Working Paper Series 46, pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burk, Dan L. (1997, Fall) “How State Regulation of the Internet Violates the Commerce Clause” 17 Cato Journal 2, p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Henry N. and Macey, Jonathan R. (1996) “Externalities and the Matching Principle: The Case for Reallocating Environmental Regulatory Authority.” 14 Yale Law & Public Policy Review / Yale Journal on Regulation 2, Symposium Issue, “Constructing a New Federalism: Jurisdictional Competence and Competition,” p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, Robert and Ellig, Jeny (1997) Economic Deregulation and Customer Choice: Lesson for the Electric Industry. Fairfax, Va.: Center for Market Processes, pp. 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detlefsen, Robert R. (1998, June I) “Escaping the Tort-Based Auto Accident Compensation System: The Federal Auto Choice Reform Act of 1997.” Citizens for a Sound Economy Issue Analysis 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Richard A. (1995) “Constitutional Faith and the Commerce Clause.” 71 Notre Dame Law Review 1, p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Richard A. (1987, November) “The Proper Scope of the Commerce Power.” 73 Virginia Law Review 8, p. 1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, Daniel A and Hudec, Robert E. (1994) “Free Trade and the Regulatory State: A GAIT’s Eye View of the Dormant Commerce Clause.” 47 Vanderbilt Law Review, p. 1438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavora, Carrie J. (1998, June 9) “Back to the Drawing Board: Why Tax Reform Is the Key to Health Care Reform.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennard, William E. (1999, June IS) “The Road Not Taken: Building a Broadband Future for America.” Remarks before the National Cable Television Association. Available at Internet web site: http://wwwfcc.gov/commissioners/kennard/speeches.html.

  • Kitch, Edmund W. (1981) “Regulation and the American Common Market.” In Tarlock, A. Dan, (ed.) Regulation, Federalism, and Interstate Commerce. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, Publishers, Inc., p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leboeuf, Jacques (1994, Summer) “The Economics of Federalism and the Proper Scope of the Federal Commerce Power.” 31 San Diego Law Review, p. 607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, James, (1829, February 12) Letter to J. C. Cabell. Quoted in Raoul Berger, (1996, March) “Judicial Manipulation of the Commerce Clause,” 74 Texas Law Review 4, p. 705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Dan (1998, March) Auto Choice: Impact on the Cities and the Poor. Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, Jr. Richard J. (1984, October) Regulation, Deregulation. Federalism and Administrative Law. Report to the Administrative Conference of the United States, p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, Jr., Richard J. (1995, Spring) “Regulation, Deregulation, Federalism, and Administrative Law: Agency Power to Preempt State Regulation.” 46 University of Pittsburgh Law Review, p. 607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, Ezra Parmalee and Egan, John G. (1898) The Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution. Chicago, Ill.: Callaghan and Company, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagan, President Ronald (1987, October 26) Executive Order No. 12612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, Donald H. (1986) “The Supreme Court and State Protectionism: Making Sense of the Dormant Commerce Clause.” 84 Michigan Law Review, p. 1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalia, Antonin. (1997) A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegan, Bernard H. (1972) Land Use Without Zoning. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmahmann, David and Finch, James. (1997, March) “The Unconstitutionality of State and Local Enactments in the United States Restricting Ties with Burma (Myanmar).” 30 Vanderbilt Journal of Transna tional Law 2, pp. 175–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriver, Melinda L. and Arnett, Grace-Marie. (1998, August 14) “Uninsured Rates Rise Dramatically in States with Strictest Health Insurance Regulations” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer, Adam D. (1998a, April 13) “A Five-Point Checklist for Successful Electricity Deregulation Legislation.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer, Adam D. (1999a, September 2) “Broadband Telecommunications in the 21st Century: Five Principles for Reform.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer, Adam D. (1999c) The Delicate Balance: Federalism. Interstate Commerce. and Economic Freedom in the Technological Age. Washington, D.C.: The Heritage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer, Adam D. (1997, June 23) “Electricity Deregulation and Federalism: How Congress and the States Can Work Together to Deregulate Successfully.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer, Adam D. (1998b, April 22) “20th Anniversary of Airline Deregulation: Cause for Celebration, Not Re-regulation.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer, Adam D. (1999b, October 5) “Why Congress Should Counter Efforts to Tax Internet Commerce.” Heritage Foundation Executive Memorandum 628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip. (1993) Product-Risk Labeling: A Federal Responsibility. Washington, D.C.: The AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willkie II, Wendell L. and Abbott, Alden F. (1992, August) “Who Should Regulate Business? Assessing the Federal-State Balance of Power.” Washington Legal Foundation, Critical Legal Issues, Working Paper Series 48, pp. vi–vii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thierer, A.D. (2001). Federalism and Commercial Regulation. In: Racheter, D.P., Wagner, R.E. (eds) Federalist Government in Principle and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1395-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1395-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5532-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1395-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics