Abstract
At the time of the American founding, “commerce” (or, more specifically, “interstate commerce”) was a far more rudimentary concept than we understand it to be today. The most prevalent form of interstate commerce was waterborne commerce; thus, early court cases and legislative action dealt primarily with trade on navigable waters or with port and harbor regulation issues.2 Disputes also arose over agricultural trade, bridge and highway policy, taxation of goods in transit, and routine border controversies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Annett, Alex F. (1997, October 31) “Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: How Congress Can Increase Property Owners’ Access to Justice.” Heritage Foundation F. Y. I. 158.
Ashraf, Saba. (1997) “Virtual Taxation: State Taxation of Internet and On-line Sales.” 24 Florida State University Law Review 3.
Bany, John S. (1998, May I) “Federalism and Financial Services.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1160.
Bernstein, David (1992, October 5) “Equal Protection for Economic Liberty: Is the Court Ready” Cato Institute Policy Analysis.
Bork, Robert H. (1991, July) “Federalism and Federal Regulation: The Case of Product Labeling.” Washington Legal Foundation, Critical Legal Issues, Working Paper Series 46, pp. 4–5.
Burk, Dan L. (1997, Fall) “How State Regulation of the Internet Violates the Commerce Clause” 17 Cato Journal 2, p. 147.
Butler, Henry N. and Macey, Jonathan R. (1996) “Externalities and the Matching Principle: The Case for Reallocating Environmental Regulatory Authority.” 14 Yale Law & Public Policy Review / Yale Journal on Regulation 2, Symposium Issue, “Constructing a New Federalism: Jurisdictional Competence and Competition,” p. 25.
Crandall, Robert and Ellig, Jeny (1997) Economic Deregulation and Customer Choice: Lesson for the Electric Industry. Fairfax, Va.: Center for Market Processes, pp. 34–47.
Detlefsen, Robert R. (1998, June I) “Escaping the Tort-Based Auto Accident Compensation System: The Federal Auto Choice Reform Act of 1997.” Citizens for a Sound Economy Issue Analysis 72.
Epstein, Richard A. (1995) “Constitutional Faith and the Commerce Clause.” 71 Notre Dame Law Review 1, p. 190.
Epstein, Richard A. (1987, November) “The Proper Scope of the Commerce Power.” 73 Virginia Law Review 8, p. 1403.
Farber, Daniel A and Hudec, Robert E. (1994) “Free Trade and the Regulatory State: A GAIT’s Eye View of the Dormant Commerce Clause.” 47 Vanderbilt Law Review, p. 1438.
Gavora, Carrie J. (1998, June 9) “Back to the Drawing Board: Why Tax Reform Is the Key to Health Care Reform.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1189.
Kennard, William E. (1999, June IS) “The Road Not Taken: Building a Broadband Future for America.” Remarks before the National Cable Television Association. Available at Internet web site: http://wwwfcc.gov/commissioners/kennard/speeches.html.
Kitch, Edmund W. (1981) “Regulation and the American Common Market.” In Tarlock, A. Dan, (ed.) Regulation, Federalism, and Interstate Commerce. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, Publishers, Inc., p. 43.
Leboeuf, Jacques (1994, Summer) “The Economics of Federalism and the Proper Scope of the Federal Commerce Power.” 31 San Diego Law Review, p. 607.
Madison, James, (1829, February 12) Letter to J. C. Cabell. Quoted in Raoul Berger, (1996, March) “Judicial Manipulation of the Commerce Clause,” 74 Texas Law Review 4, p. 705.
Miller, Dan (1998, March) Auto Choice: Impact on the Cities and the Poor. Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress.
Pierce, Jr. Richard J. (1984, October) Regulation, Deregulation. Federalism and Administrative Law. Report to the Administrative Conference of the United States, p. 74.
Pierce, Jr., Richard J. (1995, Spring) “Regulation, Deregulation, Federalism, and Administrative Law: Agency Power to Preempt State Regulation.” 46 University of Pittsburgh Law Review, p. 607.
Prentice, Ezra Parmalee and Egan, John G. (1898) The Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution. Chicago, Ill.: Callaghan and Company, p. 15.
Reagan, President Ronald (1987, October 26) Executive Order No. 12612.
Regan, Donald H. (1986) “The Supreme Court and State Protectionism: Making Sense of the Dormant Commerce Clause.” 84 Michigan Law Review, p. 1092.
Scalia, Antonin. (1997) A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, p. 140.
Siegan, Bernard H. (1972) Land Use Without Zoning. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.
Schmahmann, David and Finch, James. (1997, March) “The Unconstitutionality of State and Local Enactments in the United States Restricting Ties with Burma (Myanmar).” 30 Vanderbilt Journal of Transna tional Law 2, pp. 175–207.
Schriver, Melinda L. and Arnett, Grace-Marie. (1998, August 14) “Uninsured Rates Rise Dramatically in States with Strictest Health Insurance Regulations” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1211.
Thierer, Adam D. (1998a, April 13) “A Five-Point Checklist for Successful Electricity Deregulation Legislation.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1169.
Thierer, Adam D. (1999a, September 2) “Broadband Telecommunications in the 21st Century: Five Principles for Reform.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1317.
Thierer, Adam D. (1999c) The Delicate Balance: Federalism. Interstate Commerce. and Economic Freedom in the Technological Age. Washington, D.C.: The Heritage Foundation.
Thierer, Adam D. (1997, June 23) “Electricity Deregulation and Federalism: How Congress and the States Can Work Together to Deregulate Successfully.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1125.
Thierer, Adam D. (1998b, April 22) “20th Anniversary of Airline Deregulation: Cause for Celebration, Not Re-regulation.” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1173.
Thierer, Adam D. (1999b, October 5) “Why Congress Should Counter Efforts to Tax Internet Commerce.” Heritage Foundation Executive Memorandum 628.
Viscusi, W. Kip. (1993) Product-Risk Labeling: A Federal Responsibility. Washington, D.C.: The AEI Press.
Willkie II, Wendell L. and Abbott, Alden F. (1992, August) “Who Should Regulate Business? Assessing the Federal-State Balance of Power.” Washington Legal Foundation, Critical Legal Issues, Working Paper Series 48, pp. vi–vii.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thierer, A.D. (2001). Federalism and Commercial Regulation. In: Racheter, D.P., Wagner, R.E. (eds) Federalist Government in Principle and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1395-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1395-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5532-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1395-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive