Abstract

Pest management using pesticides has been an usual way to control insect pests by farmers all around the world in the past several years. This is primarily because pesticides gave quick and obvious results. Nobody bothered whether a chemical treatment is absolutely necessary or not. Soon the harmful effects of pesticides began to show. Chronic and cumulative poisoning began to appear. Secondary pest out-breaks and pest resurgence became common phenomena. Thus it has become imperative to all concerned to seek alternate methods of pest management. Parasitic Hymenoptera are good alternatives for chemical pest control. They form an important component in biological control programmes of several insect pests. Among the natural enemies used in biological control of insect pests, the parasitic Hymenoptera has been the most successful (Clausen, 1978; Noyes,1985). According to Greathead (1986) out of 393 species of parasitoids which have been established in classical biological control programmes, 344 (87%) are parasitic Hymenoptera. The parasitic Hymenoptera were responsible for 279 cases of effective biological control, as opposed to 3 cases of Aculeate Hymenoptera and 40 cases of Diptera.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Agricola, U., Agounke, D., Fisher, H.V. and Moore, D. 1989, The control of Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Togo by the introduction of Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes(Hymenoptera: Encyritidae), Bull. Entomol Res. 79: 671 - 678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boucek, Z. 1979, Description of a new eupelmid parasite (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of cockroaches in India, Bull. Entomol. Res. 69: 93 - 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boucek, Z. 1988, Australasian Chalcidoidea, CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.Google Scholar
  4. Boucek, Z. and Narendran, T.C. 1981, Indian Chalcid wasps (Hymenoptera) of the genus Dirhinus parasitic on Synanthropic and other Diptera, Syst. Entomol. 6: 229 - 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chacko, M.J. 1987, Biological Control with exotic as well as indigenous natural enemies, J. Coffee Res. 17:109– 113.Google Scholar
  6. Cherian, M.C. and Margabandhu, V. 1943, Preliminary trials with Trichogramma parasites for control of Cotton boll worms, Madras Agri. J. 31(4): 107–111.Google Scholar
  7. Clausen, C.P. 1978, Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds: a review, In:Agricultural Hand Book, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  8. David, H. and Easwaramoorthy, S. 1985, Recent advances in biological control of sugarcane pests, In:Advances in Biological Control Research in India, eds. K.J.Joseph and U.C.Abdurahiman, Proceedings of National Seminar on Entomophagous Insects, Calicut, India, pp. 200–213.Google Scholar
  9. De Bach, P. 1959, New species and strains of Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasitic on the California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Mask) in the Orient, Ann. Entomol. Soc. Ame. 52(4): 354–362.Google Scholar
  10. De Bach, P. (ed.) 1964, Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  11. De Bach, P. and Rosen, D. 1991, Biological Control by Natural Enemies, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 255–285.Google Scholar
  12. Eggleton, P. and Belshaw, R. 1992, Insect parasitoids; an evolutionary over view, Philo. Trans. Royal Soc.Series B, 337: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greathead, D.J. 1986, Parasitoids in classical biological control, In: Insect Parasitoids, eds. J.K.Waage and D.J. Greathead, Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Gupta, V.K. 1988, Parasitic Hymenoptera Research and Education, Adv. Paras. Hymenoptera Res. pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  15. Hayat, M. and Subba Rao, B.R. 1986, Family Trichogrammatidae, Oriental Insects 20: 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huffaker, C.B. and Gutierrez, A.P. 1990, Natural enemies and prey population, In: Armoured Scale Insects:Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, ed. D. Rosen, Volume B., Elsevier, Germany, pp.185 -195.Google Scholar
  17. Krishnamoorthy, A. and Singh, S.P. 1987, Biological control of citrus mealy bug, Planococcus citri with an introduced parasite Leptomastix dactlylopì in India, Entomophaga 32: 143 -148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kunhikannan, K. 1931, The mass rearing of egg parasites of sugarcane moth borer in Mysore (Preliminary experiments), J. Mysore Agric. Exper. 12: 57–61.Google Scholar
  19. Lai, K.B. and Singh, R.N. 1945, Control of Woolly aphis by Coccinella septem- punctata Linn, Indian Farm 6(1): 24–25.Google Scholar
  20. La Salle, J. and Gauld, I.D. 1991, Parasitic Hymenoptera and biodiversity crisis, Redia 74 : 315–344.Google Scholar
  21. La Salle, J. 1993, Parasitic Hymenoptera, biological control and biodiversity, In: Hymenoptera and Biodiversity eds. J. La Salle and I.D. Gauld, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 197–215.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, M.S. and Chiu, C.H. 1961, Preliminary observation both on ecology and morphology of the egg parasite of top-borer in sugarcane, Rep. Taiwan Sugarcane Exper. Sta. 23: 101–115.Google Scholar
  23. Lin, K.S. 1988, The Eucoilidae from Taiwan, I, (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea), J. Taiwan Mus. 41(2) : 1–66.Google Scholar
  24. Mani, M.S. 1989, From the Editor, Hexapoda 1(1 & 2) : iii.Google Scholar
  25. Mani, M.S. and Sharma, S.K. 1982, Proctorupoidea (Hymenoptera) from India, A review, Oriental Insects 16: 135–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. May, R.M. and Hassell, M.P. 1988, Population dynamics and biological control, Philoso. Trans. Roy. Soc.London, B 318: 129–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nair, K.S.S. 1996, A new species of Sympiesis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasitic on teak defoliator Hyblaeae puera (Lepidoptera: Hyblaedae), Bull. Entomol Res. 86: 73 - 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nair, M.R.G.K. 1986, Insects and mites of crops in India, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  29. Narendran, T.C., Anil, K. and Surekha, K. 1992, On some important and beneficial chalcids (Hymenoptera:Chalcidoidea) associated with sericulture industry in India, Bioved 3(1) : 1 - 6.Google Scholar
  30. Narendran, T.C. 1984a, Key to Indian genera of the family Chalcididae (Hym. Chalcidoidea), Entomophaga 29(4): 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Narendran, T.C. 1984b, Chalcids and Sawflies associated with plant galls, In: Biol. Gall Insects, ed. T.N.Ananthakrishnan, Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  32. Narendran, T.C. 1987, Studies on Indian Chalcididae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), Department of Zoology,University of Calicut publication, Calicut, India.Google Scholar
  33. Narendran, T.C. 1989, Oriental Chalcididae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), Zoological Monograph,Department of Zoology, University of Calicut publication. Calicut, India.Google Scholar
  34. Narendran, T.C. 1994, Torymidae and Eurytomidae of Indian subcontinent, Zoological Monograph,Department of Zoology, University of Calicut publication, Calicut, India.Google Scholar
  35. Narendran, T.C. 1996, Systematics and its Relevance, In : Second Refresher Course in Zoology (Abs.), eds.D. Ray Chaudhuri and S. Banergee, Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta publication,Calcutta, India, pp. 81–84.Google Scholar
  36. Narendran, T.C. 1998, Parasitic Hymenoptera, Interline Publishers, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  37. Narasimham, A.V. and Sankaran, T. 1982, Ecological specificity of a new oothecal parasite Neostylopyga rhombifolia (Stoll), In : Proc. Symposium on Ecology of Animal Populations, Zoological Survey of India, 3: 71–77.Google Scholar
  38. Neuencschwander, P. 1989, Biocontrol of Mango mealybug, IITA Res. Briefs 9: 5 - 6.Google Scholar
  39. Nikam, P.K. and Gaikward, A.M. 1989, Role of hyperparasitoids in the biological control of Heliothis armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae) with special reference to Campoletis chlorideae Uchida(Hymenoptera : Ichneumonidae) in India, J. Entomol. Res. 13 (1): 6 - 20.Google Scholar
  40. Noyes, J.S. 1985, Chalcidoids and biological control, Chalcid Forum 5: 5 - 10.Google Scholar
  41. Noyes, J.S. and Hayat, M. 1994, Oriental Mealybug Parasitoids of Anagyrini (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae),CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  42. Pillai, G. B. and Nair, K. R. 1982, Mating behaviour and biology of Elasmus nephantidis Rohwer(Hymenoptera:Elasmidae) a parasitoid of Nephantis serinopa Meyrick, J. Plant. Crops, 10(1) : 33–38.Google Scholar
  43. Pillai, G.B. and Nair, K.R. 1983, Xanthopimpla nana nana Schulz. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) a new pupal parasitoid of Opisina arenosella walker on coconut, J. Plant. Crops 11(1) : 65–69.Google Scholar
  44. Rajendran, B. and Gopalan, M. 1997, Pediobius foveolatus Crawford (Eulophidae: Hymenoptera) a potential parasitoid on the grubs of egg plant spotted beetle Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata Fabr. Entomo.22 (2) : 147–149.Google Scholar
  45. Rajmohana, K. and Narendran, T.C. 1998, Biodiversity of diapriid wasps (Hymenoptera) of Kerala and their potential as biocontrol agents, In : Proc. Tenth Kerala Science Congress, pp. 137 140.Google Scholar
  46. Ramesh, P.K. 1987, Observations on crop loss in robusta Coffee due to mealybug and shot-hole borer, J.Coffee Res. 17: 94 -95.Google Scholar
  47. Rao, V.P. and Nagarkatti, S. 1971, Can sugarcane borers in India be controlled by indigenous parasites? Indian Sugarcane 21: 219 -223.Google Scholar
  48. Rao, V.P., Ghani, M.A., Sankaran, T. and Mathur, K.C. 1971, A review of biological control of insects and other pests in South East Asia and Pacefic Region, CAB Tech. Commu. No. 6: 1–64.Google Scholar
  49. Reid, W.V. and Miller, K.R. 1989, Keeping Options Alive : The Scientific Basis for Conserving by Biodiversity, World Research Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  50. Simmonds, F.J. 1967, Biological control of pests of veterinary importance, In : Veterinary Bulletin,Weybridge, 37: 71–85.Google Scholar
  51. Sithanantham, S. and Solayappan, A.R. (eds.) 1980, Biological Control of Sugarcane Pests in India, The Tamil Nadu Co-operative Sugar Federation Ltd., Madras, India.Google Scholar
  52. Sudheendrakumar, V.V. 1986, Studies on the natural enemies of the teak pests Hyblaea puera and Eutectona machaeralis, Research Report of Kerala Forest Research Institute 38: 1–23.Google Scholar
  53. Sudheendrakumar, V.V. 1987, Studies on the parasites of Hyblaea puera in teak plantations in Nilambur,In: Advance in Biological Control Research in India, eds. K.J.Joseph and U.C. Abdurahiman, Proc.National Seminar on Entomophagous Insects, Calicut, India, pp. 116–122.Google Scholar
  54. Surekha, K., La Salle, J., Sudheendrakumar, V.V. and Murphy, S. T. 1996, A new species of Sympiesis(Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasitic on teak defoliator Hyblaea puera (Lepidoptera: Hyblaeidae) in India, Bull. Entomol. Res. 86: 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sureshan, P. M. and Narendran, T. C. 1997, Studies on Sphegigaster Spinola (Hymenoptera : Chalcidoidea:Pteromalidae) from India, Entomon 22: 193–198.Google Scholar
  56. Swezey, O. H. 1940, A survey of the insect pest of cultivated plants in Guam., Hawaii Planters Records 44(3): 151–182.Google Scholar
  57. Thompson, W. R. 1955, A catalogue of the parasites and predators of insect pests, 3(3) Hosts of Hymenoptera, pp. 191–332.Google Scholar
  58. Thontadarya, T. S. and Rao, K. J. 1985, Egg parasitoid as one of the components in integrated management of cotton pests, In : Advances in Biological Control Research in India, eds. K. J. Joseph and U. C.Abdurahiman, Proc. National Seminar on Entomophagous Insects, Calicut, India, pp. 87–91.Google Scholar
  59. Velayudhan, R. 1987, Host selection and parasitic potential of Anastatus ramakrishnae (Mani)(Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae), In: Advances in Biological Control Research in India, eds. K. J. Joseph and U. C. Abdurahiman, Proc. National Seminar on Entomophagous Insects, Calicut, India, pp. 126–132.Google Scholar
  60. Veeranna, G. and Jyothi, H. K. 1994, Life-Table Studies on Pachycrepoideus veerannai Narendran and Anil, a Chalcid (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) parasitoid of Exorista sorbillans Weid (Diptera:Tachinidae), Entomon 19: 1–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. C. Narendran
    • 1
  1. 1.Systematic Entomology Laboratory Department of ZoologyUniversity of CalicutCalicutIndia

Personalised recommendations