Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 4 pp 293-308 | Cite as

# The Concept of Probability in Statistical Mechanics

## Abstract

Thermodynamics was first formulated to describe the thermal properties of matter and, although its scope has now been enlarged, its relationship with the other main theories of physics, general and special relativity, classical and quantum mechanics and elementary particle theory, is still rather uneasy. As Sklar remarks [1, p. 4], it “is surprising that there is any place at all in this picture for a discipline such as thermodynamics” . It could be argued that it was this perception, leading to the conclusion that there is indeed no room for thermodynamics, which was the driving force behind the development of statistical mechanics. Of course, if this point has any weight, it must be seen in the historic context of the late nineteenth century, when attitudes to atomic models were rather ambivalent [1, 2]. Writing in the introduction to his *Lectures on Gas Theory* about the decline of support for atomism in continental Europe, Boltzmann [3, p. 24] remarks (presumably, sadly) that “it has been concluded that the assumption that heat is motion of the smallest particles of matter will eventually be proved false and discarded”. The energeticist case is presented starkly by Mach:^{1}

### Keywords

Entropy Europe Coherence Harman## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### References

- [1]L. Sklar, “Physics and Chance”, Cambridge U.P., 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]Y.M. Guttmann, The Concept of Probability in Statistical Physics, Cam- bridge U. P., 1999.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]L. Boltzmann, “Lectures on Gas Theory”, English translation by S. G. Brush 1964,California U. P., 1896.Google Scholar
- [4]P.M. Harman, “The Natural Philosophy of James Clerk Maxwell”, Cambridge U. P., 1998.MATHGoogle Scholar
- [5]S.G. Brush, “Kinetic Theory”, Vol. 1, Pergamon, 1965.MATHGoogle Scholar
- [6]S.G. Brush, “Kinetic Theory”, Vol. 2, Pergamon, 1966.Google Scholar
- [7]C. Cercignani, “Ludwig Boltzmann: The Man Who TVusted Atoms”, Oxford U. P., 1998.Google Scholar
- [8]J. Loschmidt, Wiener Beri.
**73**, 139, 1876Google Scholar - [9]J. Loschmidt, Wiener Beri.
**75**, 67, 1877.Google Scholar - [10]E. Ott, “Chaos in Dynamical Systems”, (C.U.P.).Google Scholar
- [11]R.C. Tolman, “The Principles of Statistical Mechanics”, Oxford U. P., 1938.Google Scholar
- [12]A. Hobson, “Concepts in Statistical Mechanics”, Gordon and Breach, 1971.Google Scholar
- [12]D.A. Lavis, Brit. J. Phil. Sci.
**28**, 255–279, 1977.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [13]D.A. Gillies, “An Objective Theory of Probability”, Methuen, 1973.Google Scholar
- [14]R. Von Mises, “Probability, Statistics and Truth”, George, Allen and Unwin, 1957.MATHGoogle Scholar
- [15]K.R. Popper, Brit., J. Phil. Sci.
**10**, 1959, 25–42.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [16]K.R. Popper, “The Logic of Scientific Discovery”, Hutchinson, 1959.MATHGoogle Scholar
- [17]W.T. Grandy and P.W. Milonni (Editors), “Physics and Probability: Essays in Honour of E. T. Jaynes”, Cambridge U. P., 1993.Google Scholar
- [18]E.T. Jaynes, “Papers on Probability, Statistics and Statistical Physics”, Edited by R. D. Rosenkratz, Reidel, 1983.MATHGoogle Scholar
- J.M. Keynes, “A Treatise on Probability”, Macmillan.Google Scholar
- [20]G.D. Birkhoff, Proc. Nat. Ac. Sci.
**17**, 1931, 656–660.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [21]A.I. Khinchin, “The Mathematical Foundations of Statistical Mechanics”, Dover, 1949.Google Scholar
- [22]R. Kubo, “Statistical Mechanics”, North-Holland, 1965.MATHGoogle Scholar
- [23]R.M. Lewis, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.
**5**, 1960, 355.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [24]H. Grad, Comm. Pure and App. Maths.
**5**, 1952, 455–494.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [25]I. Prigogine, “Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics”, Interscience-Wiley.Google Scholar
- [26]R. Balescu, “Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics”, Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
- [27]J.P. Dougherty, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci.
**24**, 1993, 843–866.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [28]J.P. Dougherty, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc.
**A, 346**, 1994, 259–305.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [29]A.I. Khinchin, “Analytical Foundations of Physical Statistics”, Dover, 1961.Google Scholar
- [30]C.E. Shannon, and W. Weaver, “The Mathematical Theory of Communica- tion”, Illinois U. P., 1964.Google Scholar
- [31]J. Friedman and A.J. Shimony Stat. Phys.
**3**, 1971, 381.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [32]D.A. Lavis and P.J. Milligan, Brit. J. Phil. Sci.
**36**, 1985, 193–210.Google Scholar - [33]J.L. Lebowitz, Physics Today, September, 1993. 32–38.Google Scholar
- [34]J. Bricmont, Physicalia Mag.
**17**, 1995, 159–208.Google Scholar - [35]P.Ehrenfest, and T., “The Conceptual Foundations of the Statistical Approach in Mechanics”, 1912; English translation Cornell U. P., 1959.Google Scholar
- [36]H. Barnum, C.M. Caves, C. Fuchs and R. Schack, Physics Today, November 1994, 11–13.Google Scholar
- [37]D.J. Driebe, Physics Today, November 1994, 13–15.Google Scholar
- [38]I. Progogine, Les Lois du Chaos, Flammarion, 1994.Google Scholar