Advertisement

Introduction

Biomonitors and Biomarkers as Indicators of Environmental Change, Volume 2
  • Frank M. Butterworth
  • Rafael Villalobos-Pietrini
  • María E. Gonsebatt
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 56)

Abstract

Rarely has a technology been so desperately needed by society. Until recently, environmental monitoring has been based mainly on chemical observation and analysis, but the approach is problematic. Chemical monitoring being expensive cannot measure all pollutants and, given the complex array of contaminants in the environment, cannot provide good predictors of the effect of pollution on living organisms. Knowing lists of chemical contaminants is important, but not enough. Furthermore the lists imply the contaminants have an additive effect, when in fact we do not know if the effects are additive, subtractive, or synergistic. Thus, even knowing the major pollutant chemicals is not enough. Also, we learn nothing about which species will be most affected, which organ systems most sensitive, etc.

Keywords

Great Lake North American Free Trade Agreement Biosensor Technology Great Lake Research North American Great Lake 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Butterworth, F.M. 1995. Introduction. In: Biomonitors and Biomarkers as Indicators of Environmental Change: A Handbook. Butterworth, F.M., L.A. Corkum, and J. Guzmán-Rincón, Eds., Plenum Press, NY.Google Scholar
  2. Butterworth, EM., L.A. Corkum, and J. Guzmán-Rincón, Eds. 1995. Biomonitors and Biomarkers as Indicators of Environmental Change: A Handbook. Volume 50, Environmental Science Research, Series Editor: H. S. Rosenkranz, Plenum Press, NY.Google Scholar
  3. Butterworth, EM., and R. Hough. 1998. Rehabilitation of the North American Great Lakes watershed: Past and future. Landscape Ecology Volume III. Rehabilitation of Rivers, L.D. Waal, A. Large, M. Wade, and G. Pinay, Eds., John Wiley, London.Google Scholar
  4. Gerhardt, A., Ed. 1999. Biomonitoring of Polluted Waters. Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  5. Gruber D.S., and J.M. Diamond, Eds. 1988. Automated Biomonitoring of Living Sensors as Environmental Monitors. Ellis Howard Publishing, Chichester.Google Scholar
  6. Huggett, R.J., R.A. Kimerle, P.M. Mehrle, Jr., and H.L. Bergman, Eds. 1992. Biomarkers: Biochemical, Physiological, and Histological Markers of Anthropogenic Stress. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  7. Jeffrey, D.W., and B. Madden, Eds. 1991. Bioindicators and Environmental Management. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  8. Kramer, K.J.M., Ed. 1994. Biomonitoring in Coastal Waters and Estuaries. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  9. Mathewson, P.R., and J.W. Finley, Eds. 1992. Biosensor Design and Application. American Chemical Society, Washington.Google Scholar
  10. Waters, M.D., S.S. Sandhu, J.C. Huisingh, L. Claxton, and S. Nesnow, Eds. 1980. Short-Term Bioassays in the Analysis of Environmental Complex Mixtures II. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank M. Butterworth
    • 1
  • Rafael Villalobos-Pietrini
    • 2
  • María E. Gonsebatt
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for River Research InternationalRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Citogenética y Mutagénesis Ambientales, Centro de Ciencias de la Atmósfera Circuito ExteriorUNAM, Ciudad UniversitariaMéxico, D.F.Mexico
  3. 3.Biomedical Research InstituteUNAM, Ciudad UniversitariaMéxico, D.F.Mexico

Personalised recommendations