Juvenile Court and Its Systems of Juvenile Justice

  • Simon I. Singer
Part of the The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice book series (PSIC)

Abstract

The history of juvenile justice reforms in the United States and many other parts of the Western world is an uneven one (Sutton, 1988). Reforms that brought about juvenile justice are a consequence of modern-day efforts to deal with the most stubborn and defiant juveniles. Although troubled juveniles and juvenile crime have always existed, what has changed is the manner in which officials are able to deal with misbehaving juveniles. The intractable problem of what to do with the delinquent has produced solutions that go beyond the child, the family, or the community. Modern-day responses draw on ever more complex institutional responses that stretch considerably beyond the political and organizational limits of a traditional juvenile court and its system of justice.

Keywords

Bark Trench Univer Metaphor Reformer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benard, T. J. (1992). The cycle of juvenile justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bishop, D. M., & Frazier, C. E. (1991). Transfer of juveniles to criminal court: A case study and analysis of prosecutorial waiver. Notre Dale Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 5, 281–302.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Colomy, P., & Kretzmann, M. (1995). Projects and institution building: Judge Ben B. Lindsey and the juvenile court movement. Social Problems, 42, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cressey, D., & McDermott, R. A. (1973). Diversion from the juvenile justice system. Ann Arbor: National Assessment of Juvenile Corrections, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  6. Emerson, R. (1981). On last resorts, American Journal of Sociology, 87, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fagan, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1990). Determinants of judicial waiver decisions for violent juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 314–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feld, B. C. (1984). Criminalizing juvenile justice: Rules of procedure for the juvenile court. Minnesota Law Review, 69, 141–276.Google Scholar
  9. Feld, B. C. (1987). Criminal law: The juvenile court meets the principle of the offense: Legislative change in juvenile waiver statutes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78, 471–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feld, B. C. (1990). Bad law makes hard cases: Reflections on teen-aged axe-murderers, judicial activism, and legislative default. Law and Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 8, 1–101.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  12. Garland, D. (1985). Punishment and welfare: A history of penal strategies. VT: Gower.Google Scholar
  13. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Glassman, R. B. (1973). Persistence and loose coupling in living systems. Behavioral Science, 18, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagan, J., & Leon, J. (1977). Rediscovering delinquency: Social history, political ideology and the sociology of law. American Sociological Review, 42, 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamparian, D., Estep, L. K., Muntean, S. M., Priestino, R. R., Swisher, R. G., Wallace, P. L., & White, J. L. (1982). Major issues in juvenile justice information and training youth in adult courts: Between two worlds. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, B. (1984). Law and disorder: Criminal justice in America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs, M. D. (1990). Screwing the system and making it work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541, 555 (1966).Google Scholar
  20. Krisberg, B., and Austin, J. (1993). Reinventing juvenile justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Levine, M., & Levine, A. (1992). Helping children: A social history. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lindsey, B. B. (1925). Colorado’s contribution to the juvenile court. In J. Addams (Ed.), The child, the clinic, the court (pp. 274–290). New York: Johnson Reprint Corp. (Reprinted 1970).Google Scholar
  23. Mack, J. (1909). The juvenile court. The Harvard Law Review, 23, 105–126.Google Scholar
  24. Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Mennel, R. B. (1973). Thorns and thistles: Juvenile delinquents in the United States, 1825–1940. Hanover: The University of New Hampshire Press.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, J. W, & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, J. G. (1979). The revolution in juvenile justice: From rhetoric to rhetoric. In L. T. Empey (Ed.), Future of childhood and juvenile justice (pp. 66–111). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  28. Mohr, L. B. (1976). Organizations, decisions, and courts. Law and Society Review, 10, 621–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morris, A., & Giller, H. (1987). Understanding juvenile justice. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  30. Osbun, L. A., & Rode, P. A. (1984). Prosecuting juveniles as adults: The quest for “objective” decisions. Criminology, 22, 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Piatt, A. M. (1977). The child savers: The invention of delinquency, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rothman, D. J. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in progressive America. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  33. Singer, S. I. (1996). Recriminalizing delinquency: Violent juvenile crime and juvenile justice reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sutton, J. R. (1988). Stubborn children: Controlling delinquency in the United States, 1640–1981. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon I. Singer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologySUNY at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations