Significance of Cultural and Motivation Variables on Students’ Attitudes Towards Group Work

  • Simone Volet
Part of the Plenum Series on Human Exceptionality book series (SSHE)

Abstract

While the issues of group formation and group dynamics are well documented in the school context (Johnson et al., 1981; Slavin, 1983), what motivates, or alternately inhibits university students from different cultural backgrounds to engage in group work is largely unknown. In the university context, different types of group work can be identified, for example, informal study groups where students spontaneously study together of their own volition, or formal group work where students are required by their teacher to complete an assignment with a group of peers. The research reported in this paper concentrates on the latter category, the mandatory group assignments.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrich, D. (1988). A general form of Rasch’s extended logistic model for partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 1, 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Lyne, A. (1991). ASCORE: Manual of procedures for the analysis of item response data according to unidimensional Rasch models. Perth, Western Australia: Edith Cowan University.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, J.W., Poortinga, Y. P., Pandey, J., Seagull, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  4. Betancourt, H., & López, S. R. (1993). The study of culture, ethnicity and race in American psychology. American Psychologist, 48, 629–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biggs, J. B. (1992). Why and how do Hong Kong students learn? Using the learning and study process questionnaires. Education Papers 14, Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  6. Biggs, J. B. (1996). Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp.45–68). Hong Kong: CERC and Australia: ACER.Google Scholar
  7. Boekaerts, M. (1994). Action control: How relevant is it for classroom learning? In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp.427–435). Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  8. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy-makers, educators, teachers and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bosworth, K. (1994). Developing collaborative skills in college students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 59, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Candy, P. C., & Crebert, R. G. (1990). Teaching now for learning later: The transfer of learning skills from the academy to the workplace. Paper presented at the 8th Australasian Learning and Language Conference, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  11. Cheng, K. M. (1995). Excellence in education: Is it culture-free? Keynote Address presented at the 9th Annual Conference of the Educational Research Association of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
  12. Cook, L. (1991). Co-operative learning: A successful college teaching strategy. Innovative Higher Education, 16, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dansereau, D. F. (1988). Co-operative learning strategies. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and Study Strategies (pp. 103–120). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  14. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1995). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds), Learning in humans and machines (pp. 189–211). London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  15. Fennel, H. A. (1992). Students’ perceptions of co-operative learning strategies in post-secondary classrooms. Research Report (143). Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  16. Gerlach, J. M. (1994). Is this collaboration? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 59, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson, J. J. (1979/1986). The theory of affordances. In J. J. Gibson. (Ed.), The ecological approach to visual perception (pp. 127–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (Original work published in 1979).Google Scholar
  18. Hamilton, S. J. (1994). Freedom transformed: Toward a developmental model for the construction of collaborative learning environments. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 59, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.Google Scholar
  20. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverley Hills, Calif: SAGE.Google Scholar
  21. Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of lntercultural Relations, 10, 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hughes, H. W., & Townley, A. J. (1994). Co-operative learning in graduate education: A study of its effectiveness in administrator training in two California Universities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, Indian Wells, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Jackson, B. (1994). Co-operative learning: A case study of a university course in Systems Analysis. Educational & Training Technology International, 31, 166–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R. T., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kagitcibasi, C. (1996). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Mahwah N.J.: Eribaum.Google Scholar
  26. Klein, J. D., & Pridemore, D. R. (1992). Effects of co-operative learning and need for affiliation on performance, time on task, and satisfaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, C. K. E., Lim T. K., & Ng, M. (1997). Affective outcomes of co-operative learning in social studies. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 17, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emption and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCarthy, D. (1995). Loneliness, homesickness and psychological adjustment of sojourning students in Perth, W. Australia. Unpublished Master of Applied Psychology thesis, Murdoch University.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, J. E., Trimbur, J., & Wilkes, J. M. (1994). Group dynamics: Understanding group success and failure in collaborative learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 59, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ney, J. W. (1991). Collaborative learning in university grammar courses. Innovative Higher Education, 15, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning and the School of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  34. Rau, W., & Heyl, B. S. (1990). Humanizing the college classroom: Collaborative learning and social organization among students. Teaching Sociology, 18, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Redding, G & Wong, G. Y. (1987). The psychology of Chinese organizational behavior. In M. H. Bond, The psychology of the Chinese people. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Salili, F. (1996). Accepting personal responsibility for learning. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. (pp.85–106). Hong Kong: CERC and Australia: ACER.Google Scholar
  37. Salili, F. (1997). The link between cultural values, meaning of achievement and achievement motivation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education in the Chinese context, Nanjing, China.Google Scholar
  38. Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does co-operative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, B., & MacGregor, J. (1992). What is collaborative learning? In A. Goodsell & all (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education. University Park, Pa.: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching and Learning Assessment.Google Scholar
  40. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  41. Tang, K. C. C. (1996). Collaborative learning: The latent dimension in Chinese students’ learning. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 183–204). Hong Kong: CERC and Australia: ACER.Google Scholar
  42. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Triandis, H. C. (1995a). Motivation and achievement in collectivist and individualist cultures. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Culture, motivation and achievement (Vol. 9, pp.1–30). Greenwich: JAI.Google Scholar
  44. Triandis, H. C. (1995b). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.Google Scholar
  45. Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C. H., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Urdan, T. C., & Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65, 213–243.Google Scholar
  47. Van der Werde, M. (1996). Internationalizing the curriculum in higher education. In Internationalization of higher education (pp.35–90). OECD Documents. France: OECD.Google Scholar
  48. Volet, S. E. (1997a). Cognitive and affective variables in academic learning: The significance of direction and effort in students’ goals. Learning and Instruction, 7, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Volet, S. E. (1997b). Internationalization and Higher Education: Challenges and opportunities for research on learning and instruction. Keynote Address presented at the 8th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Athens.Google Scholar
  50. Volet, S. E. (1998). A manual for the use of the Students’ Appraisals of Group Assignments (SAGA). Murdoch, WA: School of Education, Murdoch University.Google Scholar
  51. Volet, S. E., & Ang, G. (1996). A cross-cultural study of university students’ perceptions of group work. Paper presented at the Educational Research Association, Singapore/Australian Association for Research in Education Joint Conference, Singapore.Google Scholar
  52. Volet, S. E., & Ang, G. (1998). Culturally mixed groups on international campuses: An opportunity for intercultural learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 17, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Volet, S. E., & Kee, J. P. P. (1993). Studying in Singapore — Studying in Australia: A student perspective. Teaching Excellence Committee, Occasional Paper No 1. Murdoch University.Google Scholar
  54. Volet, S. E., & Renshaw, P. D. (1996). Chinese students at an Australian university: Adaptability and continuity. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences, (pp.205–220). Hong Kong: CERC and Australia: ACER.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Volet
    • 1
  1. 1.Murdoch UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations