Advertisement

Ultrastructural Studies on the Development of the Gregarine Enterocystis Racovitzai in the Gut of Baetis Rhodani (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae)

  • Elda Gaino
  • Manuela Rebora

Abstract

Different developmental phases have been observed in the gregarine Enterocystis racovitzai living in Baetis rhodani (Insecta: Ephemeroptera): the young gregarine in the midgut cell epithelium; the syzygy in the midgut lumen and the cyst in the terminal portion of the midgut. Gregarines in mature syzygy exhibit characters useful for their identification. Even though the growing phases are difficult to identify, we have tentatively assigned to this species the observed single gamonts and individuals in pairs. Among the ultrastructural features, epicyte modifications and the presence of gametes in formation are described. A synopsis on the occurrence of various species of Enterocystis gregarines associated with Ephemeroptera is also reported.

Keywords

Midgut Cell Septate Junction Midgut Cell Epithelium Midgut Lumen Specific Attribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arvy, L. and W. L. Peters. 1973. Phorésies, biocoenoses et thanatocoenoses chez les Ephéméroptères, pp. 254–312. In: W. Peters and J. Peters (eds.). Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Ephemeroptera. E.J. Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
  2. Bobyleva, N. N. 1963. Recherches histochimiques sur les differénts stades du cycle vital de la grégarine Enterocystis ensis, vivant dans les larves des Ephéméroptères du genre Cloeon. Inst. Citol. Sbor. Rab. U.R.S.S. 3: 35–43.Google Scholar
  3. Codreanu, M. 1940. Sur quatre grégarines nouvelles du genre Enterocystis, parasites des éphémères torrenticoles. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. (Notes et Revue) 81:113–122Google Scholar
  4. Codreanu, R. and D. Codreanu-Balcescu. 1979. Remarques critiques sur le parasites et leur effects chez les éphéméroptères, pp. 227–243. In: K. Pasternak and R. Sowa (eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ephemeroptera. Polska Akademia Nauk., Krakow.Google Scholar
  5. Dallai, R. and M. Vegni Talluri. 1983. Freeze-fracture study of the Gregarine trophozoite: I. The top of the epicyte folds. Boll. Zool. 50: 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dallai, R. and M. Vegni Talluri. 1988. Evidence for septate junctions in the syzygy of the protozoon Gregarina polymorpha (Protozoa, Apicomplexa). J. Cell Sci. 89: 217–224.Google Scholar
  7. Desportes, I. 1963. Quelques grégarines parasites d’Tnsects aquatiques de France. Ann. Parasit. Hum. Comp. 38:341–377.Google Scholar
  8. Desportes, I. 1964. Sur la presence d’ Enterocystis ensis Zwetkow (Eugregarina, Enterocystidae) chez un Ephéméroptère des Pyrénées-Orientales. Vie et Milieu, Suppl. 17: 103–106.Google Scholar
  9. Desportes, I. 1966. Révision des grégarines de la famille des Enterocystidae (Eugregarinidae) parasites des larvesd’Ephéméroptères. Protistologica 2: 141–144.Google Scholar
  10. Desportes, I. 1974. Ultrastructure et evolution nucléaire des trophozoites d’une grégarine d’Ephéméroptère: Enterocystis fungoides M. Codreanu. J. Protozool. 21: 83–94.Google Scholar
  11. Frantzius, A. von, 1848. Einige nachträgliche Bemerkungen über Gregarinen. Arch. Naturg. 14:188–197.Google Scholar
  12. Gaino, E. and M. Rebora, 1998. Contribution to the study of Enterocystis racovitzai, a gregarine parasite of Baetis rhodani (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). Acta Protozool., 37: 125–131.Google Scholar
  13. Gcus, A. 1969. Sporentierchen, Sporozoa, die Gregarinida der land-und süsswasserbewohnenden Arthropoden Mitteleuropas, pp. 1–608. In: F. Dahl, M. Dahl and F. Peus (eds.). Die Tierwelt Deutschlands. VEB Gustav Fiscer, Jena, 57.Google Scholar
  14. Ghazali, M., M. Philippe, A. Deguercy, P. Gounon, J. M. Gallo and J. Schrével. 1989. Actin and spectrin-like (M =260–240.000) proteins in Gregarines. Biol. Cell. 67: 173–184.Google Scholar
  15. Ghazali, M. and J. Schrével, 1993. Myosin-like protein (Mr 175,000) in Gregarina blaberae. J. Euk. Microbiol. 40: 345–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karnovsky, M. S. 1965. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 27: 137A–138A.Google Scholar
  17. King, C. A., K. Lee, L. Cooper and T. M. Preston. 1982. Studies on gregarine gliding. J. Protozool., 29: 637–638Google Scholar
  18. MacKenzie, C. and M. H. Walker, 1983. Substrate contact, mucus and Eugregarine gliding. J. Protozool. 30: 3–8Google Scholar
  19. Peters, W. L. and L. Arvy. 1979. Phoresis, biocoenosis et thanatocoenosis in the Ephemeroptera, pp. 245– 263. In: K. Pasternak and R. Sowa (eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ephemeroptera. Polska Akad. Nauk., Krakow.Google Scholar
  20. Rühl, H. 1976. Uber die Bedeutung spezifischer Ultrastrukturen einiger Gamonten verschiedener Gregarinenfamilien der Ordnung Eugregarinida (Doflein, 1901) als systematische Merkmale. Arch. Protistenkd. 118:353–363.Google Scholar
  21. Schneider, A. 1882. Contribution a l’etude des grégarines. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. 10: 423–450.Google Scholar
  22. Shtein, G. A. 1960. Gregarines des arthropodes aquatiques dans les lacs de Karélie. Zool. Zh. 39: 1535– 1544.Google Scholar
  23. Vegni Talluri, M. and R. Dallai. 1983. Freeze-fracture study of the gregarine trophozoite: II. Evidence of “rosette” organization on cytomembranes in relation with micropore structure. Boll. Zool. 50: 245–255.Google Scholar
  24. Vegni Talluri, M. and R. Dallai. 1985. Freeze-fracture study of the gregarine trophozoite: III. Cytoplasmatic differentations in Lepismatophila thermobiae. Boll. Zool. 52: 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Walker M. H., C. MacKenzie, S. P. Bainbridge and C. Orme. 1979. Study of the structure and gliding movement of Gregarine garnhami. J. Protozool. 24: 566–574.Google Scholar
  26. Zwetkow, W. N. 1926. Eine neue Gregarinengattung, Enterocystis ensis, aus den Larven einer Eintagsfliege. Arch. Russ. Protist. Moskau 5: 45–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elda Gaino
    • 1
  • Manuela Rebora
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Biologia Animale ed EcologiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations