Advertisement

Cultures as Supraorganismal Wholes

  • Michael T. Ghiselin
Part of the Perspectives in Ethology book series (PEIE, volume 13)

Abstract

What do we mean by culture? This question has much in common with some that have been asked in the philosophy of taxonomy. The idea that species are not kinds of organisms, but rather wholes composed of organisms, suggests that cultural units may likewise be wholes made up of parts. If so, they are individuals rather than classes in an ontological sense. There are some very strong analogies between biological species and certain cultural units, especially languages. But there are also important differences, and identifying the wholes and their parts can be difficult. This contribution explores some of the possibilities, especially the relation of compatibility among the parts.

Keywords

Biological Species Mass Noun Species Problem Cultural Unit Tangible Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. X (1985).Culture and the evolutionary process.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cafagna, A. C. (1960). A formal analysis of definitions of “culture.” In G. E. Dole & R. L. Carneiro (Eds.),Essays in the science of culture in honor of Leslie A. White(pp. 111–132). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
  3. D’Andrade, R. (1995).The development of cognitive anthropology.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dupré, J. (1993).The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Durham, W. H. (1990). Advances in evolutionary culture theory.Annual Review of Anthropology, 19,187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Durham, W. H. (1991).Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Firth, J. R. (1957). Ethnographic analysis and language with reference to Malinowski’s views. In R. Firth (Ed.),Man and culture: An evaluation of the work of Bronislaw Malinowski(pp. 93–118). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Ghiselin, M. T. (1974a). A radical solution to the species problem.Systematic Zoology, 23, 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghiselin, M. T. (1974b).The economy of nature and the evolution of sex.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ghiselin, M. T. (1997).Metaphysics and the origin of species. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  11. Heyes, C. M., & Plotkin, H. C. (1989). Replicators and interactors in cultural evolution. In M. Ruse (Ed.),What the philosophy of biology is: Essays dedicated to David Hull(pp. 139–172). Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  12. Hull, D. L. (1988a). Interactors versus vehicles. In H. C. Plotkin (Ed.),The role of behavior in evolution(pp. 19–50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hull, D. L. (1988b).Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Keesing, R. M. (1974). Theories of culture.Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kluckhohn, C., & Kelly, W. H. (1945). The concept of culture. In R. Linton (Ed.),The science of man in the world crisis(pp. 78–106). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952).Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University: Volume 47, No. 1. Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions.Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  17. Landa, J. T. (1994).Trust, ethnicity, and identity.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lumsden, C. J., & Wilson, E. O. (1981).Genes, mind, and culture: The coevolutionary process.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Marks, J., & Staski, E. (1988). Individuals and the evolution of biological and cultural systems.Human Evolution, 3,147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Hara, R. J. (1996). Trees of history in systematics and philology.Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, 22, 81–88.Google Scholar
  21. Plotkin, H. C., & Odling-Smee, F. J. (1981). A multiple-level model of evolution and its implications for sociobiology.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,4,225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosenberg, A. (1994).Instrumental biology or the disunity of science.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Schleicher, A. (1869).Darwinism tested by the science of language(Transl. Alex. V. W. Bikkers.). London: John Camden Hotten.Google Scholar
  24. Staddon, J. E. R. (1981). On a possible relation between cultural transmission and genetical evolution. In P. P. G. Bateson and P. H. Klopfer (Eds.),Advantages of diversity(Vol. 4, pp. 135–145). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  25. Stamos, D. N. (1998). Buffon, Darwin, and the non-individuality of species-a reply to Jean Gayon.Biology and Philosophy, 13, 443–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tylor, E. B. (1871).Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom(2 Vols.). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  27. Weiss, G. (1973). A scientific concept of culture.American Anthropologist, 75, 376–413.Google Scholar
  28. White, L. A. (1959). The concept of culture.American Anthropologist, 61, 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. White, L. A. (1975).The concept of cultural systems: A key to understanding tribes and nations.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael T. Ghiselin
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for the History and Philosophy of ScienceCalifornia Academy of SciencesSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations