Pervasive Computing

  • Debashis Saha
  • Amitava Mukherjee
  • Somprakash Bandyopadhyay


Pervasive Computing (PervComp) means different things to different people. For some, pervasive computing is about mobile data access and the mechanisms needed to support a community of nomadic users. For others, the emphasis is on “smart” or “active” spaces, context awareness, and the way people use devices to interact with the environment. And still, others maintain a device-centric view, focusing on how best to deploy new functions on a device, exploiting its interface modalities for a specific task. But, truly speaking, PervComp encompasses all of these areas; it is“a new way of thinking about computers in the world, one that takes into account the natural human environment and allows the computers themselves to vanish into the background”as aptly visioned by Mark Weiser of Xerox PARC in his seminal paper [1], [3] published more than a decade ago (1991). That he was much ahead of his time is now widely acclaimed because the current PervComp vision is very much in line with his realization:“The most profound technologies are those that disappear. They weave themselves into the fabric of everyday life until they are indistinguishable from it.”So much so that, after a decade, M. Satyanarayan of CMU begins his classical paper [2] on PervComp in 2001 with a quotation of the above two legendary lines of Weiser’s article.


Mobile Computing Networking Infrastructure Pervasive Computing Smart Space Intelligent Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Weiser M., “The Computer for the 21st Century”, Scientific American, September, 1991, (reprinted in IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 19–25, Jan-Mar 2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Satyanarayanan M., “Pervasive Computing: Vision and Challenges”, IEEE Personal Communication, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp.10–17, Aug 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Special inaugural issue onReaching for Weiser’s Vision, IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. l,No. 1, Jan-Mar 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stanford V.,”Using Pervasive Computing to Deliver Elder Care”, IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 10–13, Jan-Mar 2002.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beigl M., Gellersen H. W., and Schmidt A.,”Mediacups: Experience with Design and use of Computer Augmented Everyday Objects”, Computer Networks, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp.401–409, Mar 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Banavar G., et. al. “Challenges: An Application Model for Pervasive Computing”, Proc. Of the Sixth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom 2000).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Want R. and Hopper A., “Active Badges and Personal Interactive Computing Objects”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. Vol 38. No.l, Feb. 1992, pp.10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ward A., et al, “A New Location Technique for the Active Office”, IEEE Personal Communications, Vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 1997, pp. 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Addlesee, M.D. et al, “ORL Active Floor”, IEEE Personal Communications, Vol.4, No.5, October 1997, pp. 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marmasse N., and Schmandt C, “comMotion: a context-aware communication system”,
  11. 11.
    Bahl P. and Padmanabhan V. N., “RADAR: An In-Building RF based User Location and Tracking System”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2000, Tel-Aviv, Israel, March 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arnold D., et. al., “Discourse with Disposable Computers: How and why you will talk to your tomatoes”, Proceedings of the Embedded Systems Workshop Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, March 29–31, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stephenson N., Snow Crash, Bantam Press,1992.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schilit B., Adams N., Gold R., Tso M., and Want R., “The PARCTAB Mobile Computing System”, Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems,pages 34–39, October 1993.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sousa, J.P., and Garlan, D., “Aura: an Architectural Framework for User Mobility in Ubiquitous Computing Environments” Proceedings of the 3rd Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture 2002, Montreal, August 25–31, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flinn, J., and Satyanarayanan, “M. Energy-aware Adaptation for Mobile Applications”, Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems and Principles. Kiawah Island, SC, December, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Dertouzos M., “The Oxygen Project”, Scientific American, 281(2):52–63, August 1999.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brown E. S., “Project Oxygen’s New Wind”, Technology Review, December 2001. http://www.technologyreview.eom/articles/4152.asp
  21. 21.
    Esler M., Hightower J., Anderson T., and Bordello G., “Next Century Challenges: Data-Centric Networking for Invisible Computing- The Portolano Project at the University of Washington”, Proceedings of the Fifth ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Networking and Computing, pages 256–262, August 1999.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shafer S., et al, “The New EasyLiving Project at Microsoft Research”, Proceedings of the 1998 DARPA/NIST Smart Spaces Workshop, July 1998, pp.127–130.Google Scholar
  23. 23.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debashis Saha
    • 1
  • Amitava Mukherjee
    • 2
  • Somprakash Bandyopadhyay
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Management Calcutta (IIM-C)India
  2. 2.PwC ConsultingCalcuttaIndia

Personalised recommendations