Abstract
Life history theory postulates tradeoffs of current versus future reproduction; in both developed and developing nations today, women face evolutionarily novel versions of these tradeoffs. Here we use a nonlinear dynamic model to explore: [1] the general issues of tradeoffs of education, work, and current fertility; [2] some specific examples (e.g., what increase in fertility will compensate for particular delays of age at first birth under given conditions). Finally, we model a largely unrecognized issue. Demographic transitions of the past have been characterized by decreases in fertility accompanied by (sometimes quite large) increases in per capita investment in offspring. The Rio Conference and its followup highlighted the conflicts between low-fertility, high-consumption, versus highfertility, lower consumption strategies — yet we have few ways to make testable predictions about future conflicts. We explore outcomes when impending resource constraints differentially affect short-generation-time-strategists, versus delayed-reproduction-resource-acquirers. The conditions favoring delayed fertility with resource accumulation are highly constrained; under almost all conditions reproduction in the early 20s leads to the greatest lineage success for women in the models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, K. G. (2000). The life histories of American stepfathers in evolutionary perspective. Human Nature 11: 307–333.
Anderson, K. G., & B. Low. (2002). Nonmarital first births and women’s life histories. In J. Rodgers & H. P. Kohler (eds.), The Biodemography of Human Reproduction and Fertility. Boston: Kluwer.
Barkow, J. H. (1977). Conformity to ethos and reproductive success in two Hausa communities: An empirical evaluation. Ethos 5: 409–425.
Becker, G. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Becker, G. & H. G. Lewis. (1974). Interaction between quantity and quality of children. In T. W. Schultz (ed.), Economics of the Family: Marriage Children and Human Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 81–90.
Becker, G., & R. J. Barro. (1988). Reformulating the economic theory of fertility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 103: 1–25.
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1998). Demographic transition: Are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation? TREE 13(7):266–270.
Caswell, H. (2001). Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation. 2und ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Chagnon, N. A. (1979). Is reproductive success equal in egalitarian societies? In N.A. Chagnon & W. Irons (eds.) Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective Boston: Duxbury.
Chagnon, N. A. (1982). Sociodemographic attributes of nepotism in tribal populations: Man the rule-breaker. In Kings’ College Sociobiology Group (eds.). Current Problems in Sociobiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chagnon, N. A. (1988). Life histories blood revenge and warfare in a tribal population. Science 239: 985–992.
Chiras, D. (1992). Lessons From Nature: Learning to Live Sustainably on the Earth. Island Press.
Chu, C. Y. Cyrus. (1998). Population Dynamics: A New Economic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, J. (1995). How Many People Can the Earth Support? New York: Norton.
Corcoran, M. & J. P. Kunz. (1997). Do unmarried births among African-American teens lead to adult poverty? Social Service Review (June): 274–87.
Costanza, R., B. Low, E. Ostrom, & J. Wilson (eds.). (2001). Institutions, Ecosystems, and Sustainability. CRC Press.
Cronk, L. (1991). Wealth status and reproductive success among the Mukogodo of Kenya. American Anthropologist. 93(2): 345–360.
Cronk, L, W. Irons, & N. Chagnon. (eds.) (2000). Adaptation and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Daily, G., & P. Ehrlich. (1992). Population, sustainability, and the earth’s carrying capacity. BioScience 42: 761–771.
Daily, G., & P. Ehrlich. (1996). Socioeconomic equity, sustainability, and Earth’s carrying capacity. Ecological Applications 6: 991–1001.
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2 vols. London: John Murray.
Easterlin, R. (1978). “The economics and sociology of fertility: A synthesis,” in C. Tilly (ed.), Historical Studies of Changing Fertility. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Easterlin, R., & E. Crimmins. (1985). The Fertility Revolution: A Supply-Demand Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ehelich, P., & J. Holdren. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science 171: 1212–1217.
Fadiman, J. A. (1982) An Oral History of Tribal Warfare: The Meru of Mt. Kenya. Athens OH: Ohio Univ. Press.
Fisher, R. A. (1958). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover.
Flinn, M. V. (1986) Correlates of reproductive success in a Caribbean village. Human Ecology 14: 225–243.
Geronimus, A. T. (1996a). Black/white differences in the relationship of maternal age to birthweight: A population-based test of the Weathering Hypothesis. Social Science and Medicine 42(4): 589–597.
Geronimus, A. T. (1996b). What teen mothers know. Human Nature 7(4): 323–352.
Geronimus, A. T. (1997). Teenage childbearing and personal responsibility. Political Science Quarterly 112(3): 405–430.
Geronimus, A. T., J. Bound, T. A. Waidmann, C. G. Colen, & D. Steffick. (2001). Inequality in life expectancy, functional status, and active life expectancy across selected Black and While populations in the United States. Demography 38(2): 227–251.
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour I, II. J. Them. Biol. 7: 1–52.
Hill K, & H. Kaplan. (1988). Tradeoffs in male and female reproductive strategies among the Ache. In Betzig L. M. Borgerhoff Mulder & P.W. Turke (eds.) Human Reproductive Behaviour: A Darwinian Perspective pp. 277–289 Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Hill, J. (1984). Prestige and reproductive success in man. Ethology and Sociobiology 5:77–95.
Hill, K. (1993). Life history theory and evolutionary anthropology. Evolutionary Anthropology 2: 78–88.
Hill, K., & M. Hurtado. (1996). Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Hughes A.. L. (1988). Evolution and Human Kinship. Oxford University Press Oxford.
Hurtado, M., K. Hill, H. Kaplan, & I. Hurtado. (1992). Tradeoffs between food acquisition and child care among Hiwi and Ache women. Human Nature 3: 185–216.
Irons W. (1979). Cultural and biological success. In N.A. Chagnon & W. Irons (eds.) Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective North Scituate MA: Duxbury Press.
Kaplan H., & K. Hill. (1985). Hunting ability and reproductive success among male Ache foragers: Preliminary results. Current Anthropology 26: 131–133.
Kaplan, H. (1996). A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 39: 91–135.
Kaplan, H. (1997). The evolution of the human life course. Pp. 175–210 in K. W. Wachter & C. E. Finch (eds.). Between Zeus and the Salmon: The Biodemography of Longevity. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Kaplan, H. S., J. Lancaster, S. E. Johnson, & J. A. Bock. (1995b). Does observed fertility maximize fitness among New Mexican men? Human Nature 6(4): 325–360.
Kaplan, H., & J. B. Lancaster. (2000). The evolutionary economics and psychology of the demographic transition to low fertility,” in L. Cronk, N. Chagnon, & W. Irons (eds.), Adaptation and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kaplan, H., J. B. Lancaster, & K. G. Anderson. (1998). Human parental investment and fertility: The life histories of men in Albuquerque. In Men in Families: When Do They Get Involved? What Difference Does It Make?, A. Booth & N. Crouter, eds., pp. 55–111. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kaplan, H., J. B. Lancaster, J. A. Bock, & S. E. Johnson. (1995a). Fertility and fitness among Albuquerque men: A competitive labour market theory, in R. I. M. Dunbar (ed.), Human Reproductive Decisions. London: St. Martin’s Press, in association with the Galton Institute, pp. 96–136.
Kasarda, J. D., J. Billy, & K. West. (1986). Status Enhancement and Fertility: Reproductive Responses to Social Mobility and Educational Opportunity. New York: Academic Press.
Knodel J., N. Havanon, & W. Sittitrai. (1990). Family size and the education of children in the context of rapid fertility decline. Population and Development Review 16(1): 31–62.
Krebs, J., & N. Davies. (1997). Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Press.
Lancaster, J. B. (1997). The evolutionary history of human parental investment in relation to population growth and social stratification. In Feminism and Evolutionary Biology, P. A. Gowaty, ed., pp. 466–489. New York: Chapman and Hall.
Lee, R. D. (1990). Comment: The second tragedy of the commons. Population and Development Review 16 (suppl.): 315–322.
Lessels, C. M. (1991). The evolution of life history strategies. Chapter 2 in J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (eds.). Behavioural Ecology. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
Low, B. (1993). Ecological demography: A synthetic focus in evolutionary anthropology. Evolutionary Anthropology 1993: 106–112.
Low, B. (1998). The evolution of human life histories. pp. 131–161 in C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (eds.). Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Low, B. (2000a). Why Sex Matters: A Darwinian Look at Human Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Low, B. (2000b). Sex, wealth, and fertility: Old rules, new environments. In L. Cronk, N. Chagnon, & W. Irons (eds.), Adaptation and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. Hawthorne, NY.: Aldine de Gruyter.
Low, B., A. L. Clarke, & K. Lockridge. (1992). Toward an ecological demography. Population and Development Review 18(1): 1–31.
Low, B., E. Ostrom, C. P. Simon, & J. Wilson. (2002). Redundancy and diversity: Do they influence optimal management? In Fikret Berkes, Carl Folke, & Johan Colding, (eds.) Navigating Nature’s Dynamics: Responding to Change in Social-Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, in press.
Low, B., C. P. Simon, & K. G. Anderson. (2002). An evolutionary ecological perspective on demographic transitions: Modeling multiple currencies. Am. J Human Biology 14(2): 149–167.
Luker, K. (1996). Dubious Conceptions: The Politics of Teenage Pregnancy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
MacArthur, R., & E. O. Wilson. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mace, R. (2000). An adaptive model of human reproductive rate where wealth is inherited: Why people have small families. In L. Cronk, N. Chagnon, & W. Irons (eds.), 2000. Adaptation and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. Hawthorne, NY.: Aldine de Gruyter.
Macunovich, D. J. (1998). Fertility and the Easterlin hypothesis: An assessment of the literature. J. Pop. Econ. 11:53–111.
Miller, G. Tyler. (2001). Living in the Environment: Principles, Connections, and Solutions. Brooks/Cole Inc.
Perusse, D. (1994). Mate choice in modern societies: Testing evolutionary hypotheses with behavioral data. Human Nature 5(3): 255–278.
Powell, B. & L.C. Steelman. (1989). The liability of having brothers: Paying for college and the sex composition of the family. Sociology of Education 62: 134–147.
Rank, M. A. (1989). Fertility among women on welfare: Incidence and determinants. Amer. Sociological Review 54: 296–304.
Roff, D. (1992). The Evolution of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis. New York: Chapman Hall.
Sellers, P. (1998). The 50 most powerful women in American business. Fortune, October 12, 1998: 76–86.
Smith, C. C. (1974). The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Amer. Naturalist 108: 499–506.
Steams, S. (1992). The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tasiran, A. C. (1995). Fertility Dynamics: Spacing and Timing of Births in Sweden and the United States. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Tilly, C. (1978). The historical study of vital processes, in C. Tilly (ed.). Historical Studies of Changing Fertility. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–55.
Turke P. W., & L. L. Betzig (1985) Those who can do: Wealth status and reproductive success on Ifaluk. Ethology and Sociobiology 6: 79–87.
UNEP. (2000). US Census Bureau 2000. Current Population Survey March 2000.
Vining, D. R. (1986). Social versus reproductive success: The central theoretical problem of human sociobiology. Behav. Brain Sciences 9: 167–187.
Wilber, H. M., D. W. Tinkle, & J. P. Collins. (1974). Environmental certainty, trophic level, and resource availability in life history evolution. Amer. Naturalist 108: 805–817.
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Williams, G. C. (1992). Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willis, R.J. (1973). A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. J. Political Economy 81: S14–S69.
Wilson, M., & M. Daly. (1997). Life expectancy, economic inequality, homicide, and reproductive timing in Chicago neighborhoods. British J. Medicine 314:1271–1274.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Low, B.S., Simon, C.S., Anderson, K.G. (2003). The Biodemography of Modern Women: Tradeoffs When Resources Become Limiting. In: Rodgers, J.L., Kohler, HP. (eds) The Biodemography of Human Reproduction and Fertility. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1137-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1137-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5410-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1137-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive