Skip to main content

The Impact of Intergenerationally-Transmitted Fertility and Nuptiality on Population Dynamics in Contemporary Populations

  • Chapter

Abstract

There are intergenerational continuities in contemporary fertility, mortality and partnership behaviors due to genetic and environmental factors. If persistent, these would be expected over time to lead to a proportionate increase in those with a higher than average propensity to reproduce, and consequently to lead to higher population growth (or lower decline) than would otherwise be the case. We use three scenarios of fertility transmission to investigate the differences in long run population dynamics under models of intergenerationally correlated fertility and partnership behaviors:

  1. (1)

    fertility is not heritable;

  2. (2)

    daughters’ fertility is partly correlated with mother’s fertility;

  3. (3)

    daughters have the same fertility propensity (fecundability) as their mothers.

Keywords

  • contemporary population dynamics
  • Fisher’s fundamental theorem
  • intergenerational fertility transmission
  • microsimulation
  • long term population trends

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1137-3_11
  • Chapter length: 20 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4615-1137-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrett, J.C. (1971). A Monte Carlo simulation of reproduction. In W. Brass (Ed.), Biological aspects of demography. Symposia of the Society for the Study of Human Biology Vol. 10 (pp. 11–30). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J., & Potter, R.G. (1983). Fertility, biology, and behavior: An analysis ofthe proximate determinants. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce M. S. (1990) The Red Queen visits sage grouse leks. American Zoologist, 30, 263–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Bodmer, W. F. (1971). The genet ics ofhuman populations. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. (1980). Evolution in Age-Structured Populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2001). Recent demographic development in Europe (2001). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, M.P., Martin, N.G., Staham, D.J., Sltske, S. W., Dinwiddie, S.H., Bucholz, K.K., Madden, P.A., & Heath, A.C. (1997). Genetic and environmental contributions to variance in age at first sexual intercourse. Psychological Science, 8, 211–216.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A.W.F. (1994). The fundamental theorem of natural selection. Biological Reviews, 69, 443–74.

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory ofnatural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, C. (2000). The limits to low fertility: a biosocial approach. Population and Development Review, 26, 209–234.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, S. A. (1998). Foundations ofsocial evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gam, S. M. (1980). Continuities and change in maturational timing. In O. G. J. Brim, & J. Kagan (Eds.) Constancy and Change in Human Development (pp 113–162). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press..

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini, C. (1924). Premieres recherces sur la fecondabilite de la femme. Proceedings of Mathematical Congress, Toronto, 889–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammel, E.A., Mason, C., & Wachter, K.W. (1990). SOCSIM II, a sociodemographic microsimulation program, rev. 1.0, operating manual: Graduate Group in Demography Working Paper No. 29. Berkeley, Calif: University of California, Institute of International Studies, Program in Population Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, L. (1961). Some data on natural fertility. Eugenics Quarterly, 8, 81–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. (1985). Applied Mathematical Demography. (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk K.M., Blomberg, S.P., Duffy, D.L., Heath, A.C., Owens, I.P.F, & Martin, N.G. (2001). Natural selection and quantitative genetics of life-history traits in Western women: a twin study. Evolution, 55, 423–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, H-P., Rodgers, J. L., & Christensen, K. (1999). Is fertility behavior in our genes? Findings from a Danish twin study. Population and Development Review, 25, 253–288.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, C. M., & Wilson, C. (1985). Is there a connection between a woman’s fecundity and that of her mother? Journal of Biosocial Science, 17, 437–443.

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leridon, H. (1977). Human Fertility: The Basic Components (translated by J. F. Helzner). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. (1982). ‘For their own reasons’: Individual marriage decisions and family life. Journal of Family History, 17, 255–264.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lummaa, V., Haukioja, E., Lemmetyinen, R., & Pikkola, M. (1998). Natural selection on human twinning. Nature, 394, 533–534.

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McGue, M., & Lykken, D. T. (1992). Genetic influence on risk of divorce. Psychological Science, 3, 368–373.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S.A., & Bumpass, L. (1988). Intergenerational consequences of family disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 130–52.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. (1999). Is the relationship between fertility of parents and children really weak? Social Biology, 46, 122–145.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. (2001) Family and kinship networks in the context of aging societies. Paper prepared for the Conference on Population Ageing in the Industrialized Countries: Challenges and Responses organised by the Committee on Population Age Structures and Public Policy of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP) and the Nihon University Population Research Institute (NUPRI), Tokyo, Japan, 19–21 March 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M., & Wang, D. (2001). Family-level continuities in childbearing in low-fertility societies. European Journal of Population, 17, 75–96.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M., & Knudsen, L. B. (2002) The Relationship ofFull and Half Sibs, Birth Order and Gender with Fertility in Contemporary Denmark. Mimeo London: The London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M., & Knudsen, L. B. (2002). The intergenerational transmission of fertility in contemporary Denmark: the effects of number of siblings (full and half), birth order, and whether male or female. Population Studies, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K., Lee, A., & Bramley-Moore, L. (1899). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VI — genetic (reproductive) selection: inheritance of fertility in man, and of fecundity in thoroughbred racehorses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A192, 257–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski A., & Moller, A. (1995) A resolution of the lek paradox. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) B, 260, 21–29.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, H., & Mueller, C.W. (1976). The intergenerational transmission of marital instability: comparisons by race and sex. Journal of Family issues, 32, 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, G.R. (1972). Fisher’s ‘fundamental theorem’ made clear. Annals of Human Genetics, 365, 485–90.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J.L., & Doughty, D. (2000). Genetic and environmental influences on fertility expectations and outcomes using NLSY kinship data. In J. L. Rodgers, D. C. Rowe, & W. B. Miller (Eds.) Genetic influences on Human Fertility and Sexuality (pp. 85–105). Boston: Kluwer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J. L., Hughes, K., Kohler, H.-P., Christensen, K., Doughty, D., Rowe, D.C., & Miller, W.B. (2001). Genetic influence helps explain variation in human fertility outcomes: evidence from recent behavioural and molecular genetic studies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 184–88.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J L., Kohler, H-P., Kyvik, K., & Christensen, K. (2001). Genes affect human fertility via fertility motivations: Findings from a contemporary Danish twin study. Demography, 38, 29–42.

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. (1980). The influence of first generation fertility and economic status on second generation fertility. Population and Environment, 3, 51–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ulizzi L., Astolfi, P., & Zonta, L.A. (1998). Natural selection in industrialized countries: a study of three generations of Italian newborns. Annals of Human Genetics, 62, 47–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wachter K.W. (n.d.). Socsim Technical Documentation, available at http://www.demog.berkeley.edu/

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. A., & Williams, B. J. (1974). A re-examination of the heritability of fertility in the British peerage. Social Biology, 21, 225–231.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood J.W., & Weinstein, M. (1988). A model of age-specific fecundability. Population Studies, 42, 85–113.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murphy, M., Wang, D. (2003). The Impact of Intergenerationally-Transmitted Fertility and Nuptiality on Population Dynamics in Contemporary Populations. In: Rodgers, J.L., Kohler, HP. (eds) The Biodemography of Human Reproduction and Fertility. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1137-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1137-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5410-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1137-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive