The Human Face pp 131-147 | Cite as

Context-Analysis of Facial-Affective Behavior in Clinical Populations

  • Jörg Merten

Abstract

Several studies investigating the functions of facial-affective behavior in dyadic interactions demonstrate the importance of facial-affective behavior for the expression of emotional feelings and for relationship-regulation in social interactions (Krause, Steimer-Krause, Merten, & Ullrich, 1998). In the realm of mental disorders and psychotherapeutic processes attention to facial-affective behaviour is a good starting point for the understanding of psychopathological processes taking place in social interactions between patients and their interacting partners (Merten, Ullrich, Anstadt, Krause, & Buchheim, 1996). Most clinical disorders are based on maladaptive relationship-patterns (Krause & Merten, 1999). Many authors have investigated this perspective of mental disorder using different theoretical concepts. Luborsky (1977), for example, derives patients' core conflictual relationship themes from narrations about relationship-episodes. Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB; Benjamin, 1974, 1993) is used to formulate cyclic maladaptive patterns (CMP, Johnson, Popp, Schacht, Mellon, & Strupp, 1989). Horowitz (1997) uses role-relationship-model-configurations to describe different forms of social behavior of patients. These authors use mostly narration about behavior and relationship-episodes to extract maladaptive relationship-patterns. Beside the narration of relationship-episodes the actualization and interactive implementation of relationship-patterns in social interactions is not yet well understood.

Keywords

Schizophrenia Mellon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anstadt, T., Merten, J., Ullrich, B., & Krause, R. (1997). Affective dyadic behavior, core conflictual relationship themes and treatment outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 7, 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, R. J., & Katsikitis, M. (2002). Foreign faces: A voyage to the land of EEPICA. In M. Katsikitis (Ed), The human face. Measurement and meaning (pp. 1–28). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media New York.Google Scholar
  3. Benecke, C. (2000). Mimischer affektausdruck und sprachinhalt im psychotherapeutischen Prozeß. Dissertation an der philosophischen Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes, Germany.Google Scholar
  4. Benecke, C., Krause, R. & Merten, J. (in press). On the constitution of the intersubjective field. European Journal of Psychotherapy.Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, L. S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 392–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin, L. S. (1993). Interpersonal diagnostics and treatment of personality disorders. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Buck, R. (1993). Interpersonal expectations. Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell’s mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 268–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frank, M. Getting to know your patient: how facial expression can help reveal true emotion. In M. Katsikitis (Ed), The human face: Measurement and meaning (pp. 255–283). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Fridlund, A. J. (1991). The sociality of solitary smiles: Effects of an implicit audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frisch, I. (1997). Einefrage des geschlechts? Mimischer ausdruck und affekterleben in gesprächen. Saarländische Schriftenreihe zur Frauenforschung. St.Ingbert: Röhrig.Google Scholar
  12. Haack-Dees, B. (2000). Affektives verhalten in eltern-kind-dyaden mit einem schizophrenen jugendlichen. Affective behavior in parent-child-dyads with a schizophrenic adolescent. Dissertation at the University of Saarland.Google Scholar
  13. Hahlweg, K., Dürr, H., & Müller, U. (1995), Familienbetreung schizophrener patienten. Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  14. Horowitz (1997). Formulation as a basis for planning psychotherapy treatment. Washington DC, London: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  15. Izard, C.E. (1994). Innate and universal facial expression: Evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 288–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, M. E., Popp, C., Schacht, T. E., Mellon, J. & Strupp, H. H. (1989) Converging evidence for identification of recurrent relationship themes: Comparison of two methods. Psychiatry, 52, 275–288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kappas, A. (1997). The fascination with faces. Are they windows to our soul. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kappas, A. (2002). What facial activity can and cannot tell us about emotions. In M. Katsikitis (Ed.), The human face: Measurement and meaning (pp. 215–234). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media New York.Google Scholar
  19. Krause, R. & Merten, J. (1999) Affects, regulation of relationship, transference and countertransference. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 8,. 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krause, R., Steimer-Krause, E., Merten, J., Ullrich, B., (1996). Dyadic interaction regulation, emotion and psychopathology. In: W.F. Flack & J. Laird (Eds.), Emotions and psychopathology: Theory and research, (pp. 70–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Luborsky, L. (1977). Measuring a pervasive structure in psychotherapy: The core conflictual relationship theme method. In N. Freedman & N. Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structure (pp. 367–395). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  22. Magnusson, M.S. (1996). Hidden real-time patterns in intra- and inter-individual behavior: Description and detection. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Merten, J. (1996). Affekte und die regulation nonverbalen, interaktiven verhaltens. Strukturelle aspekte mimisch-affektiven verhaltens und die integration von affekten in regu-lationsmodelle. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  24. Merten, J. (1997). Facial-affective behavior, mutual gaze and emotional experience in dyadic interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21,179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merten, J. (2001). Beziehungsregulation in psychotherapien. Maladaptive beziehungsmuster und der therapeutische Prozeß. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  26. Merten, J. & Krause, R. (in press). What makes good therapists fail ? In P. Philippot, E..J. Coats, & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior in clinical settings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Merten, J., Ullrich, B., Anstadt, T., Krause, R. & Buchheim, P. (1996). Emotional experiencing and facial expression in the psychotherapeutic-process and its relation to treatment outcome. A pilot-study. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 198–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Patterson, M., L. (1991). A functional approach to nonverbal exchange. In R. Feldman & B. Rime (Eds), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 458–495). New York:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rosenthal, R. & Rubin, D. B. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Russell, J.A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression ? A review of the cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg Merten
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität des Saarlandes Im StadtwaldSaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations