Nanotribology pp 165-175 | Cite as

Materials and Reliability Issues in MEMS and Microsystems

  • Aris Christou

Abstract

The recent evolution in microelectronics of combining electrical and mechanical functions has brought about an exciting new field — microelectromechanical system (MEMS) [1, 2]. Miniature structures developed by new fabrication techniques on semiconductor wafers make possible new devices that have the potential to revolutionize instrumentation and control systems. At the University of Wisconsin (Madison), an air driven microelectromechanical generator has been developed by Henry Guckel. Using parts that are a fraction of the thickness of human hair, a generator was designed giving an output of five volts and weighing less than five grams. In separate developments, a team at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor) has built atomic-force microscopes that enable insights into surface science and produce miniature probes for use in advanced prostheses. At the Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center at the University of California, researchers have built a microgripper capable of handling micron-sized structures. The heart of the gripper is a novel microstructure that consists of interdigitated fingers, or cantilevers, which are activated electrostatically to move the gripper arms. Such a device has potential applications in biomedicine and micro-telerobotics. In the sections that follow, the research issues related to materials and microsystems are discussed. The research problems that must be solved are presented as well as recommendations for research support by industry and federal agencies.

Keywords

Titanium Nickel Catheter Dioxide Transportation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    O’Connor, L., “MEMS: microelectromechanical systems,” Mechanical Engineering, February 1992,40–47.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wise, K.D., “Integrated microelectromechanical systems: a perspective on MEMS in the 90s,” IEEE MEMS Workshop, 1991, 33–38.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Middelhoek, A.S. and Audet, S.A., Silicon Sensors, Academic Press, 1989, pp. 118–122.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roylance, L.M. and Augell, J.B., “A batch fabricated silicon accelerometer,” IEEE Trans. Electron Dev., ED-26(12), December 1979, 1911–1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shajii, J., Ng, K.Y. and Schmidt, M.A., “A microfabricated floating-element shear stress sensor using wafer-bonding technology,” J. Microele(-ti-omechanical System, 1 (2), June 1992,89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, C.J., Pisano, A.P. and Muller, R.S., “Silicon-processed overhanging microgripper,” J. Microelectromechanical System, 1(1), March 1992, 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arimatsu, K., Hashimoto, I., Oishi, S., Tanaka, S., Sato, T. and Gejyo, T., “Development of large scale ion beam milling machines,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Phys. Research, B37/38, June 1989, 833–837.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suzuki, K. and Tanigawa, H., “Single crystal silicon rotational micromotors,” IEEE MEMS Workshop, January 1991, 15–20.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hannening, M. et al., “Modeling of three dimensional microstructures by the LIGA Process,” IEEE MEMS Workshop, 1992, 202–207. and Sorensen, Inc., Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aris Christou
    • 1
  1. 1.Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations