Skip to main content

Sharing and Checking Organisation Knowledge

  • Chapter
Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories
  • 143 Accesses

Abstract

The approach of Multi-Perspective Enterprise Modelling is now more commonly accepted and used in practice as a way to manage organisational knowledge than ever before. However, the concept of applying multiple modelling languages to describe the same domain may still sound frightening to many. In addition to the cost, time and complexity involved, problems such as knowledge sharing between multiple models and achieving and maintaining integrity between them are also important. We argue that Multi-Perspective Enterprise Modelling is helpful and in some situations necessary. This paper gives examples of how formal methods, such as logical languages, can provide assistance in making such an approach more appealing and transparent. We suggest that the MPM approach is valuable in representing, understanding and analysing a complex domain, such organisational knowledge, but that much automated support is needed.1

This paper reports a part of work carried out under AOEM project. The AOEM project is sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency darpa under the contract number N66001-99-D-8608. The u.s. Government and the University of Edinburgh are authorised to reproduce and distribute reprints for their purposes not with standing any copyright annotation hereon. The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing official policies or endorsements, either express or implied, of darpa, the u.s. government or the University of Edinburgh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AKT (2000). Advanced knowledge technologies project, interdisciplinary research collaboration, uk. http://www.aktors.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • AOEM (1999). Air operation enterprise modelling project, darpa program. http://www.darpa.mil/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., and Jacobson, I. (1999). The Unified Modelling Language User Guide. Object Technology. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen-Burger, Y.-H. (2001a). Formal Support for an Informal Business Modelling Method. Phd thesis, Artificial Intelligence, The University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen-Burger, Y.-H. (2001b). A knowledge based multi-perspective framework for enterprise modelling. Technical report at AI, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmasri, R. and Navathe, S. B. (2000). Fundamentals of Database Systems. Addison-Wesley, 3rd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, U. (2000). Multi-perspective enterprise models as a conceptual foundation for knowledge management. Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM (1992). Business System Development Method, Introducing BSDM. IBM, London, UK, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDEF0 (1993). Integration Definition for Function Modelling (IDEF0). National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., Menzel, C., Painter, M., Witte, P., Blinn, T., and Perakath, B. (1995). IDEF3 Process Description Capture Method Report. Knowledge Based Systems Inc. (KBSI). http://www.idef.com.

  • Ould, M. A. (1995). Business Processes: Modelling and Analysis for Re-engineering and Improvement. John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B., and Breuker, J. (1997). KADS: A Principled Approach to Knowledge-Based System Development. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, P. R. S., Dean M. Jones, T. B.-C., and Shave, M. (1998). Assessing heterogeneity by classifying ontology mismatches. Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proceedings of FOIS, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., pages 148–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, IBM Publication., 26(3). Relevant web site: http://www.zifa.com/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen-Burger, YH. (2002). Sharing and Checking Organisation Knowledge. In: Dieng-Kuntz, R., Matta, N. (eds) Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0947-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0947-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5318-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0947-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics