Abstract
The approach of Multi-Perspective Enterprise Modelling is now more commonly accepted and used in practice as a way to manage organisational knowledge than ever before. However, the concept of applying multiple modelling languages to describe the same domain may still sound frightening to many. In addition to the cost, time and complexity involved, problems such as knowledge sharing between multiple models and achieving and maintaining integrity between them are also important. We argue that Multi-Perspective Enterprise Modelling is helpful and in some situations necessary. This paper gives examples of how formal methods, such as logical languages, can provide assistance in making such an approach more appealing and transparent. We suggest that the MPM approach is valuable in representing, understanding and analysing a complex domain, such organisational knowledge, but that much automated support is needed.1
This paper reports a part of work carried out under AOEM project. The AOEM project is sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency darpa under the contract number N66001-99-D-8608. The u.s. Government and the University of Edinburgh are authorised to reproduce and distribute reprints for their purposes not with standing any copyright annotation hereon. The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing official policies or endorsements, either express or implied, of darpa, the u.s. government or the University of Edinburgh.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AKT (2000). Advanced knowledge technologies project, interdisciplinary research collaboration, uk. http://www.aktors.org.
AOEM (1999). Air operation enterprise modelling project, darpa program. http://www.darpa.mil/.
Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., and Jacobson, I. (1999). The Unified Modelling Language User Guide. Object Technology. Addison-Wesley.
Chen-Burger, Y.-H. (2001a). Formal Support for an Informal Business Modelling Method. Phd thesis, Artificial Intelligence, The University of Edinburgh.
Chen-Burger, Y.-H. (2001b). A knowledge based multi-perspective framework for enterprise modelling. Technical report at AI, University of Edinburgh.
Elmasri, R. and Navathe, S. B. (2000). Fundamentals of Database Systems. Addison-Wesley, 3rd edition.
Frank, U. (2000). Multi-perspective enterprise models as a conceptual foundation for knowledge management. Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu.
IBM (1992). Business System Development Method, Introducing BSDM. IBM, London, UK, 2nd edition.
IDEF0 (1993). Integration Definition for Function Modelling (IDEF0). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Mayer, R., Menzel, C., Painter, M., Witte, P., Blinn, T., and Perakath, B. (1995). IDEF3 Process Description Capture Method Report. Knowledge Based Systems Inc. (KBSI). http://www.idef.com.
Ould, M. A. (1995). Business Processes: Modelling and Analysis for Re-engineering and Improvement. John Wiley and Sons.
Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B., and Breuker, J. (1997). KADS: A Principled Approach to Knowledge-Based System Development. Academic Press.
Visser, P. R. S., Dean M. Jones, T. B.-C., and Shave, M. (1998). Assessing heterogeneity by classifying ontology mismatches. Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proceedings of FOIS, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., pages 148–162.
Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, IBM Publication., 26(3). Relevant web site: http://www.zifa.com/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen-Burger, YH. (2002). Sharing and Checking Organisation Knowledge. In: Dieng-Kuntz, R., Matta, N. (eds) Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0947-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0947-9_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5318-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0947-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive