Enzymes of Thymidylate Biosynthesis in Trichinella Pseudospiralis Muscle Larvae and Caenorhabditis Elegans Dauer Larvae

  • Magdalena Dabrowska
  • Zbigniew Zielinski
  • Barbara Golos
  • Mariusz Wranicz
  • Wojciech Rode


All species in the genus Trichinella, between them T. spiralis and T. pseudospiralis, have been successful in colonizing striated skeletal muscle tissue and remain infective in this niche for months to years. Trichinella spiralis causes trichinellosis, a serious disease in man and other mammals. Mating of adult worms (developing from infective larvae, deriving from digested infected meat) occurs in a non membrane-bound portion of columnar epithelium of the host’s small intestine. The fertilized females enter the intestinal wall and release to the bloodstream the newborn larvae. Each of these penetrates host’s skeletal muscle cell and lives in its modified portion, the nurse cell, surrounded by a collagen capsule around which a circulatory rete develops. The nurse cell development, initiated by T. spiralis infection, is associated with a variety of changes, including cell cycle re-entry and induction of DNA synthesis, followed by the apparent G2/M arrest of the infected cell in the cell cycle. Similar changes appear to be caused by T. pseudospiralis infection, albeit the nurse cell complexes are not encapsulated by collagenous fibers and the larvae may move between muscle cells (1).


Thymidine Kinase Thymidine Phosphorylase Nurse Cell Dihydrofolate Reductase Muscle Larva 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Despommier D. D. How does Trichinella spiralis make itself at home? Parasitology Today 4:318–323, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pestalozzi B. C., McGinn C. J., Kinsella T. J., Drake J. C., Glennon M. C., Allegra C. J., Johnston P.G. Increased thymidylate synthase protein levels are principally associated with proliferation but not cell cycle phase in asynchronous human cancer cells. British J Cancer 71: 1151–1157, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hokari S., Hasegawa M., Sakagishi Y., Kikuchi G. Deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase activity and its correlation with multiplication of erythroid cells in rat spleen. Biochem Int 14: 851–857, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dabrowska M., Zielinski Z., Wranicz M., Michalski R., Pawelczak K., Rode W. Trichinella spiralis thymidylate synthase: developmental pattern, isolation, molecular properties and inhibition by substrate and cofactor analogues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 228: 440–445, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsukamoto I., Taniguchi Y., Miyoshi M., Kojo S. Purification and characterization of thymidine kinase from regenerating rat liver. Biochim Biophys Acta 1079: 348–352, 1991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    So N. N. C., Wong P. C. L., Ko R. C. Precursors of pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis for gravid Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea). Int J Parasitol 22: 427–433, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mathews C. K., Scrimgeour K. G., Huennekens F. M. Dihydrofolate Reductase. Methods Enzymol 6: 364–368, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Golos B., Rode W. An isotopic assay of dUTPase activity based on coupling with thymidylate synthase. Acta Biochim Pol 46: 837–840, 1999.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rode W., Szymanowska H. Developmental pattern of thymidylate synthetase activity in silkworm: Bombyx mori L. Insect Biochem 6: 333–337, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carpenter N. J. Thymidylate synthetase in mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 75: 113–122, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yasumasu I. Saitoh M., Fujimoto N., Kusunoki S. Changes in activities of thymidylate synthetase and dihydrofolate reductase in sea urchin eggs after fertilization. Develop Growth Differ 21: 237–243, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sagata N. Meiotic mataphase arrest in animal oocytes: its mechanisms and biological significance. Trends Cell Biol 6: 22–28, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bürglin T. R., Lobos E., Blaxer M. L. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for parasitic nematodes. Int J Parasitol 28: 395–411, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hong Y., Roy R., Ambros V. Developmental regulation of a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor controls postembryonic cell cycle progression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 125, 3585–3597, 1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rode W., Scanlon K.J., Moroson B.A., Bertino J.R. Regulation of thymidylate synthetase in mouse leukemia cells (L1210). J Biol Chem 255: 1305–1311, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chu E., Allegra C. J. The role of thymidylate synthase as an RNA binding protein. BioEssays 18: 191–198, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parsels L. A., Chu E. The role of translational control of the cell cycle. Cancer J Sci Am 4: 287–295, 1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magdalena Dabrowska
    • 1
  • Zbigniew Zielinski
    • 1
  • Barbara Golos
    • 1
  • Mariusz Wranicz
    • 2
  • Wojciech Rode
    • 1
  1. 1.Nencki Institute of Experimental BiologyPolish Academy of SciencesWarszawaPoland
  2. 2.Stefa_ski Institute of ParasitologyPolish Academy of SciencesWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations