Skip to main content

A Disaggregated Perspective on Post-War Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture: Isn’t That Spatial?

  • Chapter
Agricultural Productivity

Part of the book series: Studies in Productivity and Efficiency ((SIPE,volume 2))

Abstract

Annual data from 1949 through 1991 for 48 states are used to account for changes in the composition of input and output aggregates over space and time, and thereby to obtain new evidence on changes in inputs, outputs, and productivity in U.S. agriculture. The measures change significantly when we use state-specific rather than national prices and when we allow for changes in the composition of the aggregates, especially of labor and capital inputs. The national picture is not representative of spatial sub-aggregates. For instance, state-specific annual average productivity growth rates for 1949–1991 ranged from 0.79 percent (Nevada) to 3.23 percent (Georgia) compared with a national aggregate rate of 1.90 percent per annum. We compare our estimates and those reported by Ball et al. (1999). The national estimates were similar but some substantial differences were found in state-level productivity growth, accounted for by differences in the underlying patterns of measured output and especially input quantities.

An earliear version of this paper was presented at the NC-208 Conference on “Agricultural Productivity: Data, Methods, and Measures,” Waugh Auditorium, USDA-ERS, Washington D.C., March 9–10, 2000. The authors gratefully acknowledge the considerable help they received from Barbara Craig in the construction of the data that underpin this paper. Helpful comments were provided by Bruce Beattie, Paul Cashin, Jim Chalfant, Bruce Gardner, Alan Olmstead, and participants at workshops at UC Berkeley and UC Davis, as well as the NC-208 conference. Financial assistance for this work was provided by the Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, the Farm Foundation, and the University of California Pacific-Rim Research Program. Senior authorship is not assigned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acquaye, A. K. A. 2000. “Parametric and Nonparametric Measures of State-Level Productivity Growth and Technical Change in U.S. Agriculture: 1949–1991.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahearn, M., J. Yee, V. E. Ball, and R. Nehring. 1998. “Agricultural Productivity in the

    Google Scholar 

  • United States.” Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 740, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, J. M., G W. Norton, and P. G. Pardey. 1995. Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Agricultural Economics Association (AAEA). 1980. Measurement of U.S. Agricultural Productivity: A Review of Current Statistics and Proposals for Change. ESCS Technical Bulletin No. 1614. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, V. E. 1985. “Output, Input, and Productivity Measurement in U.S. Agriculture.” American Journal of Economics, 67(3):475–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, V. E. 1994. “Measuring Agricultural Productivity in U.S. Agriculture.” Proceedings of the NC-208 symposium at Orlando, Florida, March 1993. In Evaluating Research and Productivity in an Era of Resource Scarcity, ed. W. B. Sundquist. Staff paper P94-2, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball V. E., F. M. Gollop, A. Kelly-Hawke, and G. P. Swinand. 1999. “Patterns of State Productivity Growth in the U.S. Farm Sector: Linking State and Aggregate Models.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(1): 164–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball V. E., and R. Nehring. 1998. “Patterns of State Productivity Growth in the U.S. Farm Sector.” Economic Research Service staff paper No. 9804, Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball V. E., J. C. Bureau, R. Nehring, and A. Somwaru. 1997. “Agricultural Productivity Revisited.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(4): 1045–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, G. T., and M. R. Cooper. 1948. “Relation of Agricultural Production to Inputs.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 30:117–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capalbo, S. M., and J. M. Antle. 1988. Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Explanation. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capalbo, S. M., and T. T. Vo. 1988. “A Review of the Evidence on Agricultural Productivity and Aggregate Technology.” Chapter 3 in Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Explanation, ed. S. M. Capalbo and J. M. Antle. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and W. E. Diewert. 1982. “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity.” Econometrica, 50(6):1393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, B. J., and P. G. Pardey. 1990a. “Multidimensional Output Indices.” Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Staff Paper P90-63. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, B. J., and P. G Pardey. 1990b. “Patterns of Agricultural Development in the United States.” Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Staff Paper P90-72. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, B. J., and P. G. Pardey. 1996a. “Inputs, Outputs, and Productivity Developments in U.S. Agriculture.” Contributed paper presented at the Global Agricultural Science Policy for the Twenty-First Century Conference, Melbourne, Australia, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, B. J., and P. G Pardey. 1996b. “Productivity Measurement in the Presence of Quality Change.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(5): 1349–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. 1976. “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers.” Journal of Econometrics, 4(2): 115–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. 1992. “Fisher Ideal Output, Input, and Productivity Indexes Revisited.” The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(3):211–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, R. E., D. Landau, and D. Ballou. 1987. “Agricultural Productivity Measures for U.S. States 1950–82.” In Evaluating Agricultural Research and Productivity, ed. W. B. Sundquist. University of Minnesota, Miscellaneous Publication 52–1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1960. “Measuring Inputs in Agriculture: A Critical Survey.” Journal of Farm Economics, 42:1411–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1961. “An Appraisal of Long-Term Capital Estimates: Comment.” Output,

    Google Scholar 

  • Input and Productivity Measurement. A Report of the National Bureau of Economic Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1963. “The Sources of Measured Productivity Growth: Agriculture, 1940–1960.” Journal of Political Economy, 71:331–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1994. “Productivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint” American Economic Review, 84(1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y., and V. W. Ruttan. 1971. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W. E., and R. E. Evenson. 1992. “Contributions of Public and Private Science and Technology to U.S. Agricultural Productivity.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(3):752–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W. E., and R. E. Evenson. 1993. Science for Agriculture: A Long-Term Perspective. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W., and F. M. Gollop. 1992. “Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture: A Postwar Perspective.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(3):745–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W., F. Gollop, and B. Fraumeni. 1987. Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W., and Z. Griliches. 1967. “The Explanation of Productivity Change.” Review of Economic Studies, 34:249–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, J. W. 1961. Productivity Trends in the United States. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, R. A., and G. T. Barton. 1961. Productivity of Agriculture. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 1238, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardey, P. G., B. J. Craig, and K. W. Deininger. 1994. “A New Look at State-Level Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture.” Proceedings of the NC-208 symposium at Orlando, Florida, March 1993. In Evaluating Research and Productivity in an Era of Resource Scarcity, ed. W. B. Sundquist. Staff paper P94-2, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumway, C. R. 1988. “The Statistical Base for Agricultural Productivity Research: A Review and Critique.” Chapter 4 in Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Explanation, ed. S. M. Capalbo and J. M. Antle. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. 1974. “Accounting for the Growth of Output.” American Economic Review, 64(1): 123–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Acquaye, A.K.A., Alston, J.M., Pardey, P.G. (2002). A Disaggregated Perspective on Post-War Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture: Isn’t That Spatial?. In: Ball, V.E., Norton, G.W. (eds) Agricultural Productivity. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0851-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0851-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5270-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0851-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics