Abstract
California’s electricity crisis has ignited a national debate over electricity deregulation and national energy policy. Thousands of words have been written on the role of transmission limitations, load growth, generation ownership, abnormal weather, poor market design, insufficient supply, and shortage of gas, and all of these factors are important. But one of the most important lessons emerging from this calamity clearly is a long-overdue realization that policymakers can no longer ignore the need to make electricity demand responsive to price. Without this critical ingredient, electricity markets will never function properly, electricity costs will be billions of dollars more than necessary, and a new generation of energy-saving technologies will sit on the shelf. Moreover, price-responsive demand can provide relief from the worst electricity price spikes at least as quickly as new plants can be built, with lower costs and environmental impacts.1
Associate and Chairman, respectively, The Brattle Group, Cambridge, Massachusetts (www.brattle.com) [email — Romkaew_Broehm@brattle.com]. The opinions expressed herein are the authors’ and not necessarily those of The brattle Group or its clients, which include utilitis, ganerating companies, electricity retailers, and independent system operators worldwide. The authors thank Greg Basheda, Severin Borenstein, Darrell Chodorow, Joel Gilbert, Eric Hirst, Art Rosenfeld, Gary Swofford, Joe Wharton, and jim Wolf. All errors and omissions are the authors.’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Borenstein, Severin. 2001. “The Trouble with Electricity Markets (and some solutions),” Program on Workable Energy Regulation (POWER), University of California Energy Institute, January 2001, pp. 2–3.
Branscomb, Lewis M. 1993. Empowering Technology, Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press
Braithwait, Steve and Ahmad Faruqui. 2001. “The Choice Not to Buy: Energy Savings and Policy Alternatives for Demand Response.” Public Utilities Fortnightly 239 (No. 6, March): 48–60.
Brown, Marilyn A., and C. Robert Wilson. 1992. “Promoting the commercialization of energy innovations: An evaluation of the energy-related inventions program.” Policy Studies Journal 20–1: 87–101.
Cohen, Linda R., Roger G. Noll, Jeffrey S. Banks, Susan A. Edelman, and William M. Pegram. 1991. The Technology Pork Barrel, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
Caves, M., K. Eakin and A. Faruqui. 2000. “Mitigating Price Spikes in Wholesale Markets through Market-Based Pricing in Retail Markets.” The Electricity Journal, April.
Dahl, Carol. 1993. A Survey of Energy Demand Elasticities in Support of the Development of the NEMS. U.S. Department of Energy, October 19, 1993.
Geller, Howard, and Scott McGaraghan 1998. “Successful government-industry partnership: The U.S. Department of Energy’s role in advancing energy-efficient technologies,’ Energy Policy 26–3: 166–177.
Hirst, Eric and Brendan Kirby. 2000. Retail-Load Participation in Competitive Wholesale Electricity Markets, Edison Electric Institute and Federal Energy Regulatory Policy, December.
Kocagil, Ahmet E. 1997. “Portfolio choice of government incentives: The case of commercialization of a new coal-based technology.” Energy Policy. 25–10: 887–896.
Neij, Lena. 1997. “Use of experience curves to analyze the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology.” Energy Policy 12–13: 1099–1107.
ESource, From RTP to Dynamic Buying Communication, Analysis, and Control Tools for Managing Risk, EIC-7, October 1999.
Newall, Richard G., Adam B. Jaffe and Robert N. Stavins. 1998. “The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, October: 941–975.
Powell, Jeanne W., Development, Commercialization, and Diffusion of Enabling Technologies, Progress Report for Projects Funded 1993–1995, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 6098, December 1997.
Schmalensee, Richard. 1980. “Appropriate government policy toward commercialization of new energy supply technologies,” The Energy Journal 1 (No. 2, April): 1–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Broehm, R., Fox-Penner, P. (2002). Price-Responsive Electric Demand. In: Faruqui, A., Eakin, B.K. (eds) Electricity Pricing in Transition. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 42. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0833-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0833-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5261-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0833-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive