Skip to main content

Multiple Group Comparison with Panel Data

  • Chapter
Evidence-Based Health Care Management
  • 190 Accesses

Abstract

After building the general structural equation model, the stability of the model will be tested over time. This chapter introduces panel analysis of repeated measures, or longitudinal data. A panel design is a longitudinal study of the same individuals over time. This design is very useful for comparing a number of treatment and control groups, regardless of whether individuals have been assigned randomly to the groups or not. Causal relationships among the study variables may be more appropriately detected in a panel design than in a cross-sectional design. Working with the same observations (i.e. organizations), the effects of many exogenous variables in the analysis can be statistically controlled. Thus, the structural relationships between the endogenous and the exogenous variables become more clearly delineated in a longitudinal study. The LISREL model can be used to analyze panel data with equality constraints applied (Table 29).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boles, M., Wan, T.T.H. (1992). Longitudinal analysis of patient satisfaction among Medicare beneficiaries in different HMOs and fee-for-service care. Health Services Management Research 5: 198–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, K.H. (1997). The barriers and benefits of nursing information systems. Computers in Nursing 15 (4): 191–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. (eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K.F., Farmer, M.M., Wybraniec, J.A. (1997). Health trajectories: long-term dynamics among black and white adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 38:38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L.A. (1987). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeneich, D., Long, C, Miller, S. (1992). Patient satisfaction update: Research applied to practice. Applied Nursing Research 8: 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangas, S., Kee, C.C., McKee-Waddle, R. (1999). Organizational factors, nurses’ job satisfaction, and patient satisfaction with nursing care. The Journal of Nursing Administration 29 (1): 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, J.M. (1998). Nurse staffing and patient outcomes. Nursing Outlook 46(5): 199–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C.W., Niederberger, J. (1990). Patient satisfaction surveys: An opportunity for total quality improvement. Hospital & Health Services Administration 35: 409–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, S. et al. (1993). The patient satisfaction process: Moving toward a comprehensive model. Medical Care Review 50(2): 219–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J.L. (2000). The influence of patient sociodemographic characteristics on patient satisfaction. Military Medicine 165 (1): 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, T.T.H. (1985). Well-Being for the Elderly: Primary Preventive Strategies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J.E., Davies, A.R., Stewart, A.L. (1978). The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction. Health & Medical Care Services Review 1 (1): 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wan, T.T.H. (2002). Multiple Group Comparison with Panel Data. In: Evidence-Based Health Care Management. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0795-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0795-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5243-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0795-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics