Advertisement

Atrazine potentiation of arsenic trioxide-induced cytotoxicity and gene expression in human liver carcinoma cells (HepG2)

  • Paul B. Tchounwou
  • Barbara A. Wilson
  • Ali B. Ishaque
  • John Schneider
Part of the Developments in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry book series (DMCB, volume 34)

Abstract

Recent studies in our laboratory indicated that arsenic trioxide has the ability to cause significant cytotoxicity, and induction of a significant number of stress genes in human liver carcinoma cells, HepG2 [1]. However, similar investigations with atrazine did not show any significant effects of this chemical on HepG2cells, even at its maximum solubility of 100 tg/mL in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Further cytogenetic studies were therefore carried out to investigate the combined effects of arsenic trioxide and atrazine on cell viability and gene expression in immortalized human hepatocytes. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using the MTT-assay for cell viability, while the CAT-Tox (L) assay was performed to measure the induction of stress genes in thirteen different recombinant cell lines generated from human liver carcinoma cells (HepG2), by creating stable transfectants of different mammalian promoter — chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene fusions. Cytotoxicity experiments yielded LC50values of 11.9 ± 2.6.tg/mL for arsenic trioxide in de-ionized water, and 3.6 ± 0.4 µg/mL for arsenic trioxide in 100 µg/mL atrazine; indicating a 3 fold increase in arsenic toxicity associated with the atrazine exposure. Co-exposure of HepG2cells to atrazine also resulted in a significant increase in the potency of arsenic trioxide to upregulate a number of stress genes including those of the glutathione-S-transferase Ya subunit-GST Yametallothionein,IaHMTIIA, 70-kDa heat shock protein-HSP70c fos, 153-kDa growth arrest and DNA damage (GADD153), 45-kDa growth arrest and DNA damage (GADD45), and 78kDa glucose regulated protein-GRP78 promoters, as well as the xenobiotic response element-XRE, tumor suppressor protein response element-p53RE, cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element-CRE, and retinoic acid response element-RARE. No significant changes were observed with respect to the influence of atrazine on the modulation of cytochrome P450 1A1CYP IA1, and nuclear factor kappa (B site) response element-NFiBRE by arsenic trioxide. These results indicate that co-exposure to atrazine strongly potentiates arsenic trioxide-induced cytotoxicity and transcriptional activation of stress genes in transformed human hepatocytes. (Mol Cell Biochem 222: 49-59, 2001)

Key words

atrazine potentiation arsenic cytotoxicity gene expression HepG2cells 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tchounwou PB, Wilson BA, Schneider J, Ishaque A: Cytogenetic assessment of arsenic trioxide toxicity in the Mutatox, Ames ll, and CATTox assays. Metal Ions Biol Med 6: 89–91, 2000Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    NAS: Arsenic. National Academy of Science, Washington DC, 1977Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    U.S. EPA: An Exposure and Risk Assessment for Arsenic. EPA 440/485–005. EPA Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington DC, 1982Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mock WM, Wai CM: Mobilization of arsenic in contaminated waters. In: J.O. Nriagu (cd). Arsenic in the Environment, part 1: Cycling and Characterization. John Wiley&Sons, Inc., NY, 1994, pp 99–117Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baran DR, Abernathy CO: Human oral exposure to inorganic arsenic. In: W.R. Chappell, C.O. Abernathy, C.R. Cothern (eds). Arsenic Exposure and Health. Science and Technology Press, Northwood, UK, 1994, pp 119–128Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    IARC: Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks of Chemicals to Humans. Supplement F. Overall Evaluation of Carcinogenicity. International Agency for Research on Cancer. World Health Organization, Lyon, France, 1987, pp 29–57Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IRIS: Integrated Risk Information System. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1992Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tseng WP, Chu HM, How SW, Fong JM, Lin CS, Yeh S: Prevalence of skin cancer in an endemic area of chronic arsenicism in Taiwan. J Natl Cancer tnst 40: 453–463,1968Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen CI, Chuang YC, Lin TM, Wu HY: Malignant neoplasms among residents of a blackfoot disease endemic area in Taiwan: High-arsenic artesian well water and cancers. Cancer Res 45: 5895–5899,1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen CI, Chen CW, Wu MM, Kuo TL: Cancer potential in liver, lung, bladder and kidney due to ingested inorganic arsenic in drinking water. Brit J Cancer 66: 888–892, 1992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tchounwou PB, Wilson B, IshaqueA: Important considerations in the development of public health advisories for arsenic and arsenic-containing compounds in drinking water. Rev Environ Health 24: 211–229, 1999Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tchounwou PB: Health risk assessment and management of arsenic and other toxic and hazardous metals in drinking water. Metal Ions Biol Med 6: 21–23, 2000Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coupe RH, Thurman EM, Zimmerman LR: Relation of usage to the occurrence of cotton and rice herbicides in three streams of the Mississippi Delta. Environ Sci Technol 32: 3673–3680, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Squillace PI, Thurman, EM, Furlong ET: Ground water as a non point source for atrazine and deethyl atrazine in a river during base flow conditions. Water Resources Res 29: 1719–1729, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thurman EM, Goolsby DA, Meyer MT, Kolpin DW: Herbicides in surface waters of the midwestern United States: The effects of Spring flush. Environ Sci Technol 25: 1794–1796, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hallenbeck WH, Cummingham B: In: Pesticides and Human Health. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    U.S. EPA: Atrazine Health Advisory. Office of Drinking Water. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1988Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    U.S. EPA: Drinking Water and Health: Technical Fact Sheet on Atrazine. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1999 on line at:http://www.epa.gov/OGWDW/dwh/t-soc/atrazine.html
  19. 19.
    Rousselot P, Lahoume S, Marolleau JP, Larghero T, Noguera ML, Brouet JC, Fermand JP: Arsenic trioxide and melarsoprol induce apoptosis in plasma cell lines and in plasma cells from myeloma patients. Cancer Res 59: 1041–1048, 1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Todd MD, Lee MJ, Williams JL, Nalenzny JM, Gee P, Benjamin MB, Farr SB: The CAT Tox assay: A sensitive and specific measure of stress induced transcription in transformed human liver cells. Fund Appl Toxicol 28: 118–128,1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mosmann T: Rapid colorimctric assay for cellular growth and survival: Applications to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays.JImmunl Meth 65: 55–63,1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Solomon KR, Baker DB, Richards RP, Dixon KR, Maine SJ, LaPoint TW, Kendall RJ, Weisskopf CP, Giddings JM, Giesy JP, Hall LW, Williams WM: Ecological risk assessment of atrazine in north american surface waters. Environ Toxicol Chem 15: 31–76,1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schoolmeester WL, White DR: Arsenic poisoning. Southern Med J 73:198–208,1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gordby MS: Arsenic in human medicine. In: J.O. Nriagu (cd). Arsenic in the Environment, part II: Human Health and Ecosystem Effects. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1994, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saady JJ, Blanke RV, Pollis A: Estimation of the body burden of arsenic in a child fatally poisoned by arsenic weed killer. J Analyt Toxicol 13: 310–312, 1989Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    ATSDR: Toxicological Profile for Arsenic. TP-92109. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, 1993Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fan AM: Assessment of metals in drinking water with specific references to lead, copper, arsenic, and selenium. In: L.W. Chan, L. Magos, T. Suzuki (eds). Toxicology of Metals. Lewis Publishers-CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1996, pp 39–43Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nordstorm S, Beckman L, Nordenson I: Occupational and environmental risks in and around a smelter in northern Sweden. V. Spontaneous abortion among female employees and decreased birth weight in their offspring. Hereditas 90: 291–296, 1979eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nordstorm S, Beckman L, Nordenson I: Occupational and environmental risks in and around a smelter in northern Sweden: VI. Congenital malformations. Hereditas 90: 297–302, 1979bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aschengran A, Zierler S, Cohen A: Quality of community drinking water and the occurrence of spontaneous abortion. Arch Environ Health 44: 283–290, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fujii-Kuriyama Y, Imataka H, Sogawa K, Yasumoto KI, Kikuchi Y: Regulation of CYP 1 Al expression. Fasc Am Sac Exp Biol 6: 706–7101992 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Neuhold LA, Shirayoshi Y, Ozato K, Jones JE, Nebert DW: Regulation of mouse CYP1 Al gene expression by dioxin: Requirement of two cis-acting elements during induction. Mol Cell Biol 9: 2378–2386, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yao EF, Denison MS: DNA sequence determinants for binding of transformed Ah receptor to a dioxin-responsive enhancer. Biochem 31: 5060–5067,1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Desjardins JP, Beard SE, Mapoles JE, Gee P, Thompson JA: Transcriptional activity of quinone methides derived from the tumor promoter butylated hydroxytoluene in liepG2 cells. Cancer Lett 131 201–207, 1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Strange RC, Jones PW, Fryer AA: Giutathion-S-transferase: Genetics and role in toxicology. Toxicol Lett 112–363, 2000Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rushmore TH, Pickett CB: Xenobiotic responsive elements controlling inducible expression by planar aromatic compounds and phenolic antioxidants. Meth Enzymol 206: 409–420, 1991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rushmore TH, Pickett CB: Glutathion-S-transferases, structure, regulation and therapeutic implications. J Biol Chem 268: 11475–11478, 1993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Richards RI, Heguy A, Karin M: Structural and functional analysis of the human metallothionein-1 gene: Differential induction by metal ions and glucocorticoids. Cell 37: 263–272, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cherian MB Howell SB, Imura N, Klaassen CD, Koropatnick K, Lazo J, Waalkes MP: Contemporary issues in toxicology: Role of metallothioneins in carcinogenesis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 126: 15, 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huang SY, Chan CS, Tang JL, Tien HF, Kuo TL, Huang SF, Yoa YT, Chou WC, Chung CY, Wang CH, Shen MC, Chen YC. Acute and chronic poisoning associated with treatment of acute promyeloeytic leukemia. Br J Haematol 103: 1092–1095, 1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW: p53 function and dysfunction. Cell 70: 523–526, 1992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kasten MB, Onyekwere O, Sidransy D, Vogelstein B, Craig RW: Participation of p53 protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Cancer Res 51:6304–6311, 1991Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhan Q, Carrier F, Fornace Ai: Induction of cellular p53 activity by DNA-damaging agents and growth arrest. Mol Cell Biol 13: 442–4250, 1993Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Angel P, Karin M: The roleofjun. fosand the AP-1 complex in cell-proliferation and transformation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1072: 129–157, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sassone-Corsi P, Sission IC, Verma IM: Transcriptional autoregulation of the proto-oncogene fos. Nature 334: 314–319,1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Borrelli E, Montmayeur JP, Foulkes NS, Sassone-Corsi P: Signal transduction and gene control: The cAMP pathway. Crit Rev Oncol 3: 321–338, 1992Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hollander MC, FornaceAJ: Inductionof fosRNA by DNA-damaging agents. Cancer Res 29: 1687–1692,1989Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Barlett JD, Luethy JD, Carlson SG, Sollott Si, Holbrook NM: Calcium ionophore A23187 induces expression of the growth arrest and DNA damage inducible CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP)-related gene, gaddl53. J Bioi Chem 267: 20465–20470, 1992Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Luethy JD, Holbrook NJ: Activation of gadd 153 promoter by genotoxic agents: a rapid and specific response to DNA damage. Cancer Res 52: 5–10, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Baeuerle PA: The inducible transcription activator NFKI3: Regulation by distinct protein subunits. Biochim Biophys Acta 1072: 63–80, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nelsen B, Hellman L, Shen R: The NF-KB-binding site mediates phorbolester-inducible transcription in non-lymphoid cells. Mol Cell Biol 8: 3526–3531, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hartl FU, Martin J, Neupert W: Protein folding in the cell: The role of molecular chaperones hsp70 and hsp60. Annual Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 21: 293–322,1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Liu H, Lightfoot R, Stevens JL: Activation of heat shock factor by alkylating agent is triggered by glutathione depletion and oxidation of protein thiols. J Biol Chem 271: 4805–3812, 1996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ovelgonne JH, Souren JEM, Wiegant FAC, Van-Wijk R: Relationship between cadmium-induced expression of heat shock genes, inhibition of protein synthesis and cell death. Toxicol 99: 19–30, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wooden SK, Li LJ, Navarro D, Qadri I, Pereira L: Transactivation of the grp78 promoter by malfolded proteins, glycosylation block, and calcium ionophore is mediated through a proximal region containing a CCAAT motif which interacts with CTFINF-I. Mol Cell Biol 11: 5612--5623, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Allenby G, Bosque MT, Saunders M, Kramer S, Speck J: Retinoic acid receptors and retinoic X receptors: Interactions with endogenous retinoic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90: 30–34, 1993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kirchner SC, Faustman EM: Identifying mechanisms of developmental toxicity: Application of tools from molecular biology. In: A. Puga, K.B. Wallace (eds). Molecular Biology of the Toxic Response. Taylor&Francis, Philadelphia, PA, 1999, pp 411–437Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lammer EJ, Chen OT, Hoar RM, Agnish ND, Benke PJ, Braun JT, Curry CJ, Fernhaff PM, Grix AW, Lou IT: Retinoid acid and embryopathology. New Engl J Med 313: 837–841, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    U.S. EPA: Special Report on Ingested Inorganic Arsenic: Skin Cancer and Nutritional Essentiality. Risk Assessment Forum. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1987Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    WHO: Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1984Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    OSHA: Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Fed Reg 54: 2332–2335, 1989Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tchounwou PB, Abdelghani AA, Pramar YV, Beyer LR, Steward CM: Assessment of potential health risks associated with ingesting heavy metals in fish collected from a hazardous-waste contaminated wetland in Louisiana, USA. Rev Environ Health 11: 191–203,1996Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul B. Tchounwou
    • 1
  • Barbara A. Wilson
    • 1
  • Ali B. Ishaque
    • 1
  • John Schneider
    • 2
  1. 1.Molecular Toxicology Research Laboratory, NIH-Center for Environmental Health, School of Science and TechnologyJackson State UniversityJackson
  2. 2.Client Research LaboratoryXenometrix IncBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations