Abstract
This chapter reviews the development, revision, and use of the Russian-language version of the NEO-PI-R. Particular attention is given to items and facets that have proved least adaptable to the Russian context. Potential explanations for these difficulties are identified in Russian culture and in the current atmosphere of social, economic and political flux. Data on factor structure, cross-language equivalence, cross-observer validity, and one-year stability are reported.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Birman, D. (1997). The adjustment of Russian students at Pikesville High School, Pikesville, MD. Refugee Mental Health Program, Center for Mental Health Services, Substance and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD.
Brushlinskiy, A.B. (Ed.). (1997). Психологическая наука в России XX века: Проблемы теории и истории [Psychological science in Russia of the twentieth century: Problems of theory and history]. Moscow: Psychological Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Burlachuk, L. F., & Morozov, S. A. (1989). Словарь-справочник no психодиагностике [Reference dictionary in psychodiagnostics]. Kiev: Naukova Dumka.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R., Martin, T. A., Oryol, V. E., Senin, I. G., Rukavishnikov, A. A., Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Gondo, Y., Takayama, M., Allik, J., Kallasmaa, T., & Realo, A. (2000). Personality development from adolescence through adulthood: Further cross-cultural comparisons of age differences. In V. J. Molfese & D. Molfese (Eds.), Temperament and personality development across the lifespan (pp. 235–252). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Digman, J.M. & Shmelyov, A. (1996). The structure of temperament and personality in Russian children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 341–351
Draguns, J. G., Krilova, A. V., Oryol, V. E., Rukavishnikov, A. A., & Martin, T. A. (2000). Personality characteristics of the Nentsy in the Russian arctic: A comparison with ethnic Russians by means of NEO-PI-R and POI. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 126–140.
Gindis, B. (1992). Soviet psychology on the path of perestroika. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 114–118.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Konstabel, K. (1999). A bilingual retest study of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: A comparison of Estonian and Russian versions. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Tartu, Estonia.
Kozulin, A. (1994). Psychology in utopia: Toward a social history of Soviet psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lynn, R., & Martin, T. (1995). National differences for thirty-seven nations in Extraversion, Neuroticism, Psychoticism, and economic, demographic, and other correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 403–406.
Martin, T. A., Draguns, J. G., Oryol, V. E., Senin, I. G., Rukavishnikov, A. A., & Klotz, M. L. (1997, August). Development of a Russian-language NEO-PI-R. Poster session presented at the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.
McCrae, R. R. (1993). Agreement of personality profiles across observers. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 13–28.
McCrae, R. R. (2000). Trait psychology and the revival of personality and culture studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 10–31.
Melnikov V., & Yampolskiy, L. (1985). Введение в экспериментальную психологию личности [Introduction to experimental psychology of personality]. Moscow: Prosveschenie.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.
Paunonen, S. V., Keinonen, M., Trzebinski, J., Forsterling, F., Grishenko-Roze, N., Kouznetsova, L., Chan, D. W. (1996). The structure of personality in six cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 339–353.
Petrovskiy, A. V. (1967). История советской психологии [History of Soviet psychology]. Moscow: Prosveschenie.
Simakhodskaya, Z. (2000, August). Russian revised NEO-PI-R: Concordant validity and relationship to acculturation. Poster session presented at the 108th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martin, T.A., Costa, P.T., Oryol, V.E., Rukavishnikov, A.A., Senin, I.G. (2002). Applications of the Russian NEO-PI-R. In: McCrae, R.R., Allik, J. (eds) The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures. International and Cultural Psychology Series. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47355-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0763-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive