Balancing and Compensating Equilibrium Deficits in Beings Provided with Cognitive Processing Capabilities

  • Gianfranco Minati
  • Alberto Ricciuti


This paper refers to Cognitive Science (Benjafield, 1992) and Systems Theory (Minati, 1998b). The general topic is the ability for a system to use in different ways resources, totally or partially, non or no more available as expected by the system (for instance the ability to move, which is to walk for people having good availability of natural resources presumed to be used for that purpose and to use different resources in total or partial substitution of the unavailable ones. Related systemic topics in other domains as control and signal theory, cybernetic devices, computer science, dynamics, etc., where the subjects of balancing and compensating (introduced below) are of great interest, are not subjects of this contribution even if some common meaning and analogies may be identified. The focus in on the information processing capabilities of the system to manage processes of balancing and compensating. Focus is on living systems supposed, at certain levels of complexity, provided with cognitive system, acting with cognitive models, cognitive resources and cognitive architectures. Systems provided with simulated Cognitive Systems may also be of great interest such as in robotics when some physical damages occur and they may be dealt with by processes of balancing and compensating.


Multiple Sclerosis Cognitive Processing Cognitive System Cognitive Model Cognitive Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, R. B., 1990, User model: theory, methods, and practice. International Journal of man-machine Studies 32: 511 -543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J., 1985, Cognitive Psychology and its Implication. 2nd Edition, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  3. Benjafleld, J. G., 1992, Cognition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkeley, G., 1975, Philosophical Works on Vision. Dent, London.Google Scholar
  5. Harrington, M. E., Daniel, R. W., and Kyberd, P. J., 1995, Gesture Recognition of Arm Movements using Accelerometers. The European Context for Assistive Technology (I. Placencia, Porrero, and R. Puig de la Bellacasa, eds.), IOS Press, pp. 432–435.Google Scholar
  6. Harrington, M. E., Daniel, R. W., and Kyberd, P. J., 1994, A measurement system for the recognition of arm gestures using accelerometers. Journal of Engineering Medicine 209 (H2): 129–34.Google Scholar
  7. Locke, J., 1964, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Fontana, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  8. Millar, S., 1994, Understanding and representing space: theory and evidence from studies with blind and sighted children. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Minati, G., 1998b, Sistemica, Apogeo, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
  10. Minati, G., 2001a, Esseri Collettivi, Apogeo, Milan, Italy (Collective Beings, in progress).Google Scholar
  11. Minati, G., 2001b, Experimenting with the DYnamic uSAge of Models (DYSAM) approach: the cases of corporate communication and education. In: Proceedings of the Forty Fifth Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS), July 8-13, Asilomar, California, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Minati, G., 2001c, The Dynamic Usage of Models (DYSAM). In: Proceedings of The Second Italian Conference on Systems Science. Nov. 9-10, 2001, Castel Ivano, Italy, published by Kluwer Academic, 2002, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Minati, G., Pessa, E., and Penna M. P., 1998a, Thermodynamical and logical Openness. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15 (3).Google Scholar
  14. Pessa, E., Penna, M. P., and Minati, G., 2000, Collective Phenomena in Living Systems and in Social organization. Chaos & Complexity Letters, Italy.Google Scholar
  15. Ungar, S., 2000, Cognitive Mapping without Visual Experience. In Cognitive Mapping (R. Kitchin and S. Freundschuh, eds.) Routledge, an imprint of Tasylor & Francis Books.Google Scholar
  16. Verplaetse, C., 1996, Inertial proprioceptive devices: Self-motion-sensing toys and tools. IBM, Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gianfranco Minati
    • 1
  • Alberto Ricciuti
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.AIRS - Associazione Italiana per le Ricerca sui SistemiItaly
  2. 2.Attivecomeprima - Onlus (Breast cancer Association)MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations