Bayesian Quantum Measurement of a Single-Cooper-Pair Qubit

  • Alexander Korotkov
Conference paper


An interesting and important question is what happens to a single-Cooper-pair qubit during the measurement of its state, for example, by a single-electron transistor. If the measurement is sufficiently fast (to neglect other evolutions) and complete (so that the result is unambiguous), then the answer to this question is given by the standard collapse postulate of “orthodox” quantum mechanics [1]. However, this case is hardly realizable in practice. The reason is realistically weak coupling between the qubit and the detector and also finite noise of the detector (that requires some time before the signal-to-noise ratio becomes sufficiently large). In this case the measurement should be considered as a continuous process rather than instantaneous event and the simple collapse postulate cannot be applied. So, what happens to qubit state during such realistic measurement process? This question can be answered using recently developed Bayesian formalism [2] which essentially describes how the collapse process develops in time.


Qubit State Bayesian Formalism Quantum Point Contact Quantum Feedback Quantum Feedback Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1955).MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. N. Korotkov,Phys. Rev. B60, 5737 (1999); Phys. Rev. B 63, 115403 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)149, 374 (1983); W. H. Zurek, Phys. Today 44 (10), 36 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Shnirman and G. Sehön,Phys. Rev. B57, 15400 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. B. Davies,Quantum theory of Open Systems(Academic, London, 1976MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6. D. V. Averin, cond-mat/0010052; A. M. van den Brink, quant-ph/0009163.Google Scholar
  7. 7. A. N. Korotkov, cond-mat/0008003.Google Scholar
  8. 8. R. Ruskov and A. N. Korotkov, in preparation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Korotkov
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations