Advertisement

Presumptive Planning

From Urban Design to Community Creation in One Move?
  • Jean Hillier
Part of the The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology book series (SSSC)

Abstract

In this chapter, I explore the issue of whether planners can “create community,” as one of the current catchphrases in Western Australia (WA) suggests. In doing so, I subject to reasoned critique several of the main themes evident in Western Australian: community-development processes; their physical, neighborhood-based location, a presumption that social relations follow urban form, their inclusivity or aspect of ‘togetherness,’ and the diversity of their inhabitants. As Talen (2000, p. 172) pointedly writes: “the problem, for planners, is that the notion of community is easily misinterpreted and misapplied, and planners have not exhibited any particular sign that their use of the term is well thought out.”

Keywords

Social Capital Community Psychology Western Australia Urban Form Urban Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Hindi, K. F., & Staddon, C. (1997). The hidden histories and geographies of neotraditional town planning: The case of Seaside, Florida. Environment & Planning D, Society and Space, 15, 349–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman I. (1975). The environment & social behaviour: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  3. Audirac, I., Shermyen, A., & Smith, M. (1990). Ideal urban form and visions of the good life. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56, 470–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audirac, I. (1992). Is the development debate of the 1990s to resonate as a fanfare for community? Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, 514–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Audirac, I., & Shermyen, A. (1994). An evaluation of neotraditional design’s social prescription: Postmodern placebo or remedy for suburban malaise? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baum, A., & Valins, S. (1979). Architectural mediation of residential density and control: Crowding and the regulation of social contact. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 12, (pp. 131–175). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bauman Z. 1995 Life in fragments., Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Bauman, Z. (1998). The poor — and the rest of us. Arena Journal, no. 12, 43–66.Google Scholar
  9. Bauman, Z. (2000). What it means ‘to be excluded’: Living to stay apart — or together? In Askonas, P., and Stewart, A. (Eds), Social inclusion, (pp. 73–88). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Bauman, Z. (2001). Community. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bentley, I., Alcock A., Murrain P., McGlynn S., & Smith G. 1985 Responsive environments. Oxford, UK: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  12. Bourke, S. (1998). George Eliot: Community ends. Australasian Victorian Studies Journal, 4.Google Scholar
  13. Byrne, J. (2000). Green around the gills: Environmental justice and the inner city. Baltimore, MD: Institute for Policy Studies, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  14. Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis. New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Calthorpe, P., & Fulton, W. (2001). The regional city: Planning for the end of sprawl. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  16. Chavis, D., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chavis, D., & Newbrough, J. (1986). The meaning of ‘community’ in community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Congress for the New Urbanism. (1998) Charter of the New Urbanism. Website [http://www.cnu.org].Google Scholar
  19. Cox, E. (1995). A truly civil society. Sydney, Australia: ABC Books.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, M. (1992). City of quartz. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  21. Davis, M. (1998). Ecology of fear. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  22. Day, S. (1999). Creation of community through urban design. Unpublished Planning Report, Department of Urban & Regional Planning, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  23. Dean, J., & Hastings, A. (2000). Challenging images: Housing estates, stigma and regeneration. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  24. Doolittle, R., & MacDonald, D. (1978). Communication and a sense of community in a metropolitan neighborhood: A factor analytic examination. Communication Quarterly, 26, 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duany, A., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (1992). The second coming of the American small town. Wilson Quarterly, 16, 19–50.Google Scholar
  26. Duany, A., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (1994). The neighborhood, the district and the corridor. In Katz, P. (Ed.), The New Urbanism: toward an architecture of community (pp. xvii–xx). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  27. East Perth Redevelopment Authority. (1992). East Perth. Perth, Western Australia: EPRA.Google Scholar
  28. East Perth Redevelopment Authority. (1999). The Easterly, December.Google Scholar
  29. Ebbesen, E., Kjos, F., & Sullivan, W. (1976) Spatial ecology: Its effects on the choice of friends and enemies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 505–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ellenbrook Joint Venture. (1994). Ellenbrook Community Bulletin, Autumn.Google Scholar
  31. Ellenbrook Management Propriety Ltd. (2001). Morgan Fields Covenants and Building Conditions. Perth, Western Australia: EMPL.Google Scholar
  32. Ellenbrook Management Propriety Ltd. (2001). Ellenbrook Community, Autumn. Perth, Western Australia: EMPL.Google Scholar
  33. Evans, B. (1994). Planning sustainability and the chimera of community. Town & Country Planning, 63(4), 108.Google Scholar
  34. Feldman, R. (1990). Settlement-identity: Psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society. Environment & Behaviour, 2, 183–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Feldman, R. (1996). Constancy and change in attachments to types of settlements. Environment & Behaviour, 28, 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Festinger, L., Schacter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressure informal group. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  37. Fishman, R. (1982). Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,.Google Scholar
  38. Frug, G. (1997). New urbanism or new suburbanism? Harvard Design Magazine, Winter/Spring, 56.Google Scholar
  39. Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Hastings, A., McArthur, A., & McGregor, A. (1996). Less than equal? Community organisations and estate regeneration partnerships. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hay, I. (1995). The strange case of Dr Jekyll in Hyde Park. Fear, media and the conduct of an emancipatory geography. Australian Geographical Studies, 33, 251–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Healey, P. (2000). Connected cities. Town & Country Planning, February: 55–57.Google Scholar
  43. Hillier, J., & McManus, P. (1994). Pull up the drawbridge: Fortress mentality in the suburbs. In Gibson, K., & Watson, S. (Eds), Metropolis now (pp. 91–101). Sydney, Australia: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hillier, J., & van Looij, T. (1997) Who speaks for the poor? International Planning Studies, 2(1), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hillier, J., Tonts M., Jones R., Fisher C., & Hugman, R. (2001) Strengthening communities: The contribution of housing policy and planning. Work in Progress Paper, AHURI, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  46. Hugman, R., & Sotiri, M. (2000). Housing, social capital & stronger communities AHURI Positioning Paper, Curtin University, Perth.Google Scholar
  47. Katz, P. (ed). (1994). The New Urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Kunstler, J. (1996). Home from nowhere. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  49. Kuo, F., Sullivan, W., Coley, R., & Brunson, L. (1998). Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighbourhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 823–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lewis, M. (1999). Suburban backlash. Melbourne, Australia: Bloomings Books.Google Scholar
  51. Lieven, A. (1999). Tale of two cities. American Prospect, August/September, 30–34.Google Scholar
  52. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Lynch, K. (1981). A theory of good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. MacCallum, D. (1999) Sense of place in a modern town centre: Community perceptions in Karratha. Report for Postgraduate Diploma in Urban & Regional Planning, Department of Urban & Regional Planning, Curtin University, Perth, (unpubd)Google Scholar
  55. MacCannell, D. (1992). Empty meeting grounds. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McMillan, D., & Chavis, D. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McMillan, D. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meppem, T. (1999). Strategic policy development for public sector organisations: A communicative framework for sustainable regional development planning Unpublished PhD thesis, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
  59. Merry, S. (1987). Crowding, conflict, and neighborhood regulation. In Altman, I., and Wandersman, A. (Eds), Neighborhood and community environments, (pp. 35–68). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  60. Morgan, G. (1994). Acts of enclosure: Crime and defensible space in contemporary cities. In Gibson, K., and Watson, S. (Eds), Metropolis now, (pp. 78–90). Sydney, Australia: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  61. Morris, E. (1996). Community in theory and practice: A framework for intellectual renewal. Journal of Planning Literature, 11, 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  63. Nicholson, G. (1992). The rebirth of community planning. In Thornley, A. (Ed.), The crisis of London. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Parry, L., & Strommen, S. (2001). New living report: An assessment of impacts on tenants and the community in the urban renewal of Lockridge and Langford, Western Australia. Unpublished report, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  65. Parsons, T. (1966). The principal structures of community. In Warren, R. (ed.), Perspectives on the American community. New York: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  66. Proshansky, H., Fabian, A., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Putnam, D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Putnam, D. (1994). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Putnam, D. (1996). The strange disappearance of civic America. American Prospect, Winter, 34–48.Google Scholar
  70. Putnam, D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  71. Reynolds, H., & Solomon, P. (1998). The property development process: Western Australia. Perth, Western Australia: Victor Press.Google Scholar
  72. Rivlin, L. (1987). The neighborhood, personal identity, and group affiliations. In Altman, I., and Wandersman, A. (Eds.), Neighborhood and community environment, (pp. 1–34). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  73. Ross, C., & Jang, S. J. (2000). Neighborhood disorder, fear and mistrust: The buffering role of social ties with neighbours. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 401–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Scully, V. (1994). The architecture of community. In Katz, P. (Ed.), The New Urbanism: Toward an architecture of community, (pp. 221–230). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  75. Suttles, G. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  76. Talen, E. (2000). The problem with community in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 15, 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Taylor, M. (1995). Unleashing the potential: Bringing residents to the centre of estate regeneration. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  78. Thorns, D. (1976). The quest for community. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  79. Tönnies, F. (1955). Community & society. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  80. Urban Land Institute. (1968). The community builders handbook. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.Google Scholar
  81. Western Australian Planning Commission. (1995). State planning strategy, discussion paper, The community. Perth, Western Australia: WAPC.Google Scholar
  82. Western Australian Planning Commission. (1997a). Liveable neighbourhoods: Community design code, summary booklet. Perth, Western Australia: WAPC.Google Scholar
  83. Western Australian Planning Commission. (1997b). Liveable neighbourhoods: Community design code. Perth, Western Australia: WAPC.Google Scholar
  84. Western Australian Planning Commission. (2000). Liveable neighbourhoods, (2 nd Edition). Perth, Western Australia: WAPC.Google Scholar
  85. Wiesenfeld, E. (1996). The concept of ‘we’: A community social psychology myth? Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Windass, G. (2000). Planning for community: Can we create community? Unpublished Honours thesis, Department of Urban & Regional Planning, Curtin University, Perth.Google Scholar
  87. Winter, I. (Ed). (2000). Social Capital. Melbourne, Australia: Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  88. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Young, I. M. (1999). Residential segregation and differentiated citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 3, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Hillier
    • 1
  1. 1.Curtin UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations