Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 496))

Abstract

The material properties of our bones are crucial factors in their risk to fracture. With osteoporosis, bone strength is reduced due to a loss of bone mass and a diminution of structural integrity. Bone mass can be assessed easily and precisely. For this reason prediction of bone fracture risk is nowadays merely based on bone mineral density measurements. Bone mineral density alone, however, does not suffice to predict bone fracture risk for individual patients.1-3Improved risk prediction should include bone structure as well.4-8

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. J. Melton, S. H. Kan, M. A. Frye, H. W. Wahner, W. M. O’Fallon, and B. L. Riggs, Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in womenAmerican J. Epidemiology129,1000–1012 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Rüegsegger, Bone density measurements, in:Osteoporosis: a guide to diagnosis and treatmentedited by S. Broil, S. Dambacher, and B. Karger, pp. 103–116 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. I. Ahmed, G. M. Blake, J. M. Rymer, and I. Fogelman, Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: do to accepted normal ranges lead to overdiagnosis?Ost. Int.7, 432–438 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. M. Partin, Implication of architecture for the pathogenesis and prevention of vertebral fractureBone13, 41–47 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. D. Snyder, S. Piazza, W. T. Edwards, W. C. Hayes, Role of trabecular morphology in the etiology of age-related vertebral fracturesCalcif. Tissue Int.53-S1, 14–22 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Cooper, The epidemiology of fragility fractures: Is there a role for bone quality?Calcif. Tissue Int.53-S1, 23–26 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. C. Johnston, C. W. Slemenda, Pathogenesis of osteoporosisBone17,19–22 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Ulrich, B. van Rietbergen, A. Laib, and P. Rüegsegger, The ability of 3-D structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular boneBone25(1), 55–60 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. J. Hollister, J. M. Brennan, and N. Kikuchi, A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stressJ. Biomech.27(4), 433–444 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. B. van Rietbergen, A. Odgaard, J. Kabel, and R. Huiskes, Direct mechanics assessment of elastic symmetries and properties of trabecular bone architectureJ. Biomech.29(12), 1653–1657 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. A. J. Ladd, J. H. Kinney, D. L. Haupt, and S. A. Goldstein, Finite-element modeling of trabecular bone: comparison with mechanical testing and determination of tissue modulusJ. Orthop. Res.16, 622–628 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. L. A. Feldcamp, S. A. Goldstein, A. M. Partin, G. Jesion and M. Kleerekoper, The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomographyJ. Bone Miner. Res.4, 311 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Rüegsegger, B. Koller, and R. Müller, A microtomographic system for the non-destructive evaluation of bone architectureCalcif. Tissue Int.58, 24–29 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. U. Bonse, F. Busch, O. Gunnewig, F. Beckmann, R. Pahl, G. Delling, M. Hahn, and W. Graeff, 3D computed X-ray tomography of human cancellous bone at 8 microns spatial and I 0(-4) energy resolutionBone Miner.25, 25–38 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Odgaard, K. Andersen, F. Melsen, and H. J. G. Gundersen, A direct method for fast three-dimensional serial reconstruction, J. Microscopy, 159, 335–342 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. D. Beck, B. L. Canfield, S. M. Haddock, T. J. Chen, M. Kothary, and T. M. Keaveny, Three dimensional imaging of trabecular bone using the computer numerically controlled milling TechniqueBone21(3), 281–287 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Laib, T. Hildebrand, H. J. Häuselmann, and P. Rüegsegger, Ridge Number Density: A new Parameter for in vivo Bone Structure AnalysisBone21, 541–546 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Majumdar, D. Newitt, A. Mathur, D. Osman, A. Gies, E. Chiu, J. Lotz, J. Kinney, and H. Genant, Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanicsOsteoporos. Int.6, 376–385 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. F. W. Wehrli, S. N. Hwang, J. Ma, H. K. Song, J. C. Ford, and J. G. Haddad, Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processingRadiology206(2), 347–357 (1998).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Müller, T. Hildebrand and P. Rüegsegger, Non-invasive bone biopsy: a new method to analyse and display the three-dimensional structure of trabecular bonePhys. Med. Biol.39, 145–164 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Ulrich, B. van Rietbergen, A. Laib, and P. Rüegsegger, Bone density and microstructure - New methods to determine bone quality and fracture risk, in:Computer methods in biomechanics & biomedical engineering-2edited by J. Middleton, M. L. Jones and G. N. Pande, pp. 221–229 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Pistoia, B. van Rietbergen, A. Laib and P. Rüegsegger, High-Resolution 3D-pQCT Images can be an adequate basis for in-vivo MEE analysis of bone, accepted byJournal of Biomech. Eng.(2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Ulrich, B. van Rietbergen, A. Laib and P. Rüegsegger, 1999, Load transfer analysis of the distal radius from in vivo high-resolution CT-imaging, J. Biomech., 32(8), 821–828 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. van Rietbergen, H. Weinans, R. Huiskes, and A. Odgaard, A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element modelsJ. Biomech.28(1), 69–81 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. B. van Rietbergen, W. Pistoia, D. Ulrich, R. Huiskes and P. Rüegsegger, 2000, Prediction of trabecular bone failure parameters using a tissue failure criterion and µFE analysisComp. Simul. & Model. In Medicine1–2, 98–101 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Kohlbrenner, S. Hämmerle, A. Laib, B. Koller, and P. Rüegsegger, Fast 3D multiple fan-beam CT SystemProceedings SPIE44–54 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pistoia, W., van Rietbergen, B., Eckstein, F., Lill, C., Lochmüller, E.M., Rüegsegger, P. (2001). Prediction of Distal Radius Failure with µFE Models Based on 3D-PQCT Scans. In: Majumdar, S., Bay, B.K. (eds) Noninvasive Assessment of Trabecular Bone Architecture and the Competence of Bone. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 496. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0651-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0651-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5177-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0651-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics