Advertisement

Tracking the Source of Quispisisa Type Obsidian from Huancavelica to Ayacucho

  • Richard L. Burger
  • Michael D. Glascock

Abstract

As in many parts of the world, the prehistoric peoples of the Central Andes sought out volcanic glass as a preferred material for lithic artifacts. Their taste for fine chipping material led obsidian to be exchanged over a vast area of the highlands and adjacent coast for over ten thousand years. Despite its rarity, artifacts made of obsidian have been recovered in many of the oldest known sites in both the coast and highlands of Peru (Burger and Asaro 1978; MacNeish et al. 1981; Sandweiss et al. 1998). In what is now central and northern Peru, a single chemical type of obsidian known as Quispisisa was the main type of obsidian utilized throughout the prehistoric sequence (Burger and Asaro 1977). The geologic source of Quispisisa type obsidian was located near Hatunrangra in 1999. This discovery was the culmination of a search which led from the San Genaro region of Huancavelica to the Huanca Sancos region of Ayacucho. This paper offers an account of the history of this find as well as offering a preliminary description of the source area and a discussion of the implications of its location.

Keywords

Source Area Lava Flow Volcanic Glass Archaeological Research Source Sample 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asociación LAGESA-C.F.G.S., 1996, Geología de los Cuadrángulos de Huancapi, Chincheros, Querobamba, y Chaviña.BoletínNo. 70. Instituto Geológico, Minero y Metalúrgico, Lima.Google Scholar
  2. Braswell, Geoffrey E. and Michael D. Glascock, 1998, Interpreting intra- source variation in the com- position of obsidian: the geoarchaeology of San Martin Jilotepeque, Guatemala.Latin American Antiquity9 (4): 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burger, Richard L. and Frank Asaro, 1977, Trace element analysis of obsidian artifacts from the Andes: new perspectives on pre-Hispanic economic interaction in Peru and Bolivia.Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report6343: 1–88. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  4. Burger, Richard L. and Frank Asaro, 1978, Obsidian distribution and provenience in the central high- lands and coast of Peru.Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility36: 61–83. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  5. Burger, Richard L. and Frank Asaro, 1979, Análisis de rasgos signifícativos en la obsidiana de los Andes centrales.Revista del Museo Nacional43: 281–326. Lima.Google Scholar
  6. Burger, Richard L., Frank Asaro and Helen Michel, 1984, The source of the obsidian artifacts at Chavín de Huantar.The Early Occupation of Chavín de Huantar, Peruby Richard L. Burger. Appendix E, pp. 263–270. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  7. Burger, Richard L., Frank Asaro, Guido Salas and Fred Stross, 1998b, The Chivay obsidian source and the geological origin of Titicaca Basin Type obsidian artifacts.Andean Past5: 203–223.Google Scholar
  8. Burger, Richard L., Frank Asaro, Paul Trawick and Fred Stross, 1998a, The Alca obsidian source: the origin of raw material for Cuzco Type obsidian artifacts.Andean Past5: 185–202.Google Scholar
  9. Burger, Richard L. and Michael D. Glascock, 2000, The Puzolana obsidian source: locating the geo- logic source of Ayacucho Type obsidian.Andean Past6: 289–308.Google Scholar
  10. Burger, Richard L., Katharina J. Schreiber, Michael D. Glascock, and José Ccencho, 1998c, The Jampatilla obsidian source: identifying the geological source of Pampas Type obsidian artifacts from southern Peru.Andean Past5: 225–239.Google Scholar
  11. Castillo, José M., Javier Barreda A. and Churchill Vela V., 1993, Geología de los Cuadrángulos de Laramate y Santa Ana.BoletínNo. 45. Instituto Geológico, Minero y Metalúrgico, Lima.Google Scholar
  12. Darras, Veronique, 1999,Tecnologías Prehispánicas de la Obsidiana: Los centros de producción de la región de Zináparo-Prieto, Michoacan.Centre Francais d’ Etudes Mexicaines et Centraméricaines, Mexico.Google Scholar
  13. Flores Ochoa, Jorge, 1968, Los pastores de Paratía: una introducción a su estudio.Instituto Indigenista Serie Antropología Social,vol. 10. Mexico D.F.Google Scholar
  14. Glascock, M.D, H. Neff, K.S. Stryker and T.N. Johnson, 1994, Sourcing archaeological obsidian by an abbreviated-NAA procedure.Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry180: 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez Carré, Enrique, 1992,El Señorío de los Chankas.Editorial INDEA, Universidad de Huamanga, Ayacucho.Google Scholar
  16. González Holguin, Diego, 1989,Vocabulario de la Lengua General de Todo el Piru Llamada Lengua Qquichua.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima. [originally 1608]Google Scholar
  17. Jennings, Justin and Michael D. Glascock, n.d., Description and history of exploitation of the Alca obsidian source, Peru.Latin American Antiquity,in press.Google Scholar
  18. Lumbreras, Luis G., 1974,Las Fundaciones de Huamanga: Hacia una Prehistoria de Ayacucho.Editorial “Nueva Educación” para El Club Huamanga, Lima.Google Scholar
  19. MacNeish, Richard S., Angel Garcia Cook, Luis G. Lumbreras, Robert K. Vierra and Antoinette Nelken-Terner, 1981,Prehistory of the Ayacucho Basin, Peru.Volume II, Excavations and Chronology. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  20. MacNeish, Richard S., Robert Vierra, Antionette Nelken-Terner, R. Lurie and Angel Garcia Cook (eds.), 1983,Prehistory of the Ayacucho Basin, Peru. Volume IV, The Preceramic Way of Life.University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  21. Meddens, Frank, 1985,The Chicha/Soras Vallet during the Middle Horizon; Provincial Aspects of Huari.Ph.D. Dissertation. University of London.Google Scholar
  22. Mendivil, S. 1965, Geología de los Cuadrángulos de Maure and Antajave.Com. Carta Geológico Nacional. BoletínNo. 10, Lima.Google Scholar
  23. Petersen, Georg, 1970,Minería y metalúrgia en el antiguo Perú. Arqueológicas12. Museo de Antropología y Arqueología, Lima.Google Scholar
  24. Ravines, Rogger, 1969/1970, El sitio arqueológico de Chuncuimarca, Huancavelica.Revista del Museo Nacional36: 234–257, LimaGoogle Scholar
  25. Ravines, Rogger, 1971, Grupos de tradición cazadora en las tierras altas de Huancavelica, Perú.Revista del Museo Naciónal37: 17–27, Lima.Google Scholar
  26. Ravines, Rogger, 1972, Secuencia y cambios en los artefactos líticos del sur del Perú.Revista del Museo Nacional38: 133–184, Lima.Google Scholar
  27. Salazar, Humberto y César Landa, 1993, Geología de los Cuadrángulos de Mala, Lunahuaná, Tupe, Canayca, Chincha, Tantara y Castrovirreyna.BoletínNo. 44. Instituto Geológico, Minero y Metalúrgico, Lima.Google Scholar
  28. Sancho de La Hoz, Pedro, 1968, Relación para su Majestad. inBiblioteca Peruana,Tomo I, pp. 275–343. Editores Técnicos Asociados, SA, Lima.Google Scholar
  29. Sandweiss, Daniel H. et al., 1998, Quebrada Jaguay: Early South American maritime adaptations.Science291: 1830–1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schreiber, Katharina J., 1992, Wari Imperialism in Middle Horizon Peru. Anthropological Papers, Number 87. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  31. Valdez, Lidio and Cirilo Vivanco, 1994, Arqueología de la Cuenca del Qaracha, Ayacucho, Perú.Latin American Antiquity5 (2): 144–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Valdez, Lidio, Cirilo Vivanco, and Caimiro Chávez, 1990, Asentamientos Chanka en la Cuenca del Pampa Qauracha (Ayacucho).Gaceta Arqueológica Andina17: 17–26.Google Scholar
  33. Vaughn, Kevin J. and Michael D. Glascock, n.d.. Exchange of Quispisisa obsidian in Nasca: new evidence from Marcaya. Andean Past 7, in press.Google Scholar
  34. Vivanco, Cirilio, 1998, El poblamiento prehispánico en la Cuenca del Pampas y Qaracha, Sarhua (Ayacucho)Conchopata-Revista de Arqueología1: 163–190, Ayacucho.Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, J. 1962, Geología de los Cuadrángulos de Pachia y Palca.Serv. de Geol. Y Min. BoletínNo. 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Burger
  • Michael D. Glascock

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations