Gender Differences in Intellectual and Moral Development?

The Evidence that Refutes the Claim
  • Mary M. Brabeck
  • Erika L. Shore
Part of the The Springer Series in Adult Development and Aging book series (SSAD)


When Samuel Johnson was asked, “Who is smarter, men or women?” he is reported to have answered, “Which man? Which woman?” (As quoted in Nicholson, 1984, p. 77). With this seemingly simple response, Johnson moved out of the traditionally dichotomous paradigm that has guided much of psychology’s exploration of gender differences. For decades, philosophers, historians, and social science researchers have focused on the differences between men and women, often entering their investigations with the implicit assumption that differences exist, and then attempting to explain these differences with anecdotal and/or empirical “evidence.” Psychological theory and research on intellectual and moral development have been no exception.


Gender Difference Moral Judgment Moral Reasoning Moral Development Genital Herpes 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arlin, P. K. (1975). Cognitive development in adulthood: A fifth stage? Developmental Psychology, 11, 602–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armon, C, & Dawson, T. L. (1997). Developmental trajectories in moral reasoning across the life span. Journal of Moral Education, 26(4), 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Basseches, M. (1980). Dialectical schemata: A framework for the empirical study of the development of dialectical thinking. Human Development, 23, 400–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1990). Gender differences in epistemological development. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 555–561.Google Scholar
  6. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1995). The integration of relational and impersonal knowing in young adults’ epistemological development. Journal of College Student Development, 36(3), 205–216.Google Scholar
  8. Baxter Magolda, M. B., & Porterfield, W. D. (1985). A new approach to assess intellectual development on the Perry scheme. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26, 343–351.Google Scholar
  9. Bebeau, M., & Brabeck, M. M. (1989). Ethical sensitivity and moral reasoning among men and women in the professions. In M. Brabeck (Ed.), Who cares? Theory, research and educational implications of the ethic of care (pp. 144–163). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  10. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brabeck, M. (1983). Moral judgment. Developmental Review, 3, 274–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brabeck, M. (1984). Longitudinal studies of intellectual development during adulthood: Theoretical and research models. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17(3), 12–27.Google Scholar
  14. Brabeck, M. (1989). Who cares? Theory, research and educational implications of the ethic of care. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  15. Brabeck, M. (1993). Recommendations for re-examining women’s ways of knowing. New Ideas in Psychology, 11(2), 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brabeck, M., & Larned, A. G. (1997). What we do not know about women’s ways of knowing. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), Women, men and gender: Ongoing debates (pp. 261–269). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, L., Gilligan, C., & Tappan, M. (1995). Listening to different voices. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development: An introduction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  18. Broughton, J. (1978). Development of concepts of self, mind, reality and knowledge. New Directions for Child Development, 1, 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clopton, N. A., & Sorell, G. T. (1993). Gender differences in moral reasoning: Stable or situational? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., & Lieberman, M. (1983). A longitudinal study of moral judgment. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 40(1–2), Serial No. 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Conley, T. D., Jadack, R. A., & Hyde, J. S. (1997). Moral dilemmas, moral reasoning and genital herpes. The Journal of Sex Research, 34(3), 256–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crawford, M. (1997). Agreeing to differ: Feminist epistemologies and women’sways of knowing. In M. M. Gergen & S. N. Davis (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender (pp. 267–284). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Daniels, J., D’Andrea, M., & Heck, R. (1995). Moral development and Hawaiian youths: Does gender make a difference. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Day, J. M., & Tappan, M. B. (1995). Identify, voice, and the psycho/dialogical perspectives from moral psychology. American Psychologist, 50(1), 47–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Debold, E., Tolman, D., & Brown, L. M. (1996). Embodying knowledge, knowing desire: Authority and split subjectivities in girls’ epistemological development. In N. R. Goldberger, J. M. Tarule, B. M. Clinchy, & M. F. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge difference and power: Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing (pp. 85–124). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Durham, R. L., Hays, J., & Martinez, R. (1994). Socio-cognitive development among Chicano and Anglo American college students. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 178–182.Google Scholar
  27. Erikson, E. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freud, S. (1925, 1961). Some psychological consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition, Vol. 19. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  30. Garmon, L. C, Basinger, K. S., Gregg, V. R., & Gibbs, J. (1996). Gender differences in stage and expression of moral judgment. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 42(3), 418–437.Google Scholar
  31. Gibbs, J. C, Basinger, K. S., & Fuller, D. (1992). Moral maturity: Measuring the development of sociomoral reflection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481–517.Google Scholar
  33. Gilligan, C. (1979). Woman’s place in man’s life cycle. Harvard Educational Review, 49(4), 431–446.Google Scholar
  34. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Gilligan, C, & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 223–237.Google Scholar
  36. Gilligan, C, & Wiggins, G. (1987). The origins of morality in early childhood relations. In J. Kagan and S. Lamb (Eds.), Emergence of morality in young children (pp. 277–306). Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Goldberger, N. R., Tarule, J. M., Clinchy, B. M., & Belenky, M. F. (1996). Knowledge difference and power: Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Helms, J. E. (1994). How multiculturalism obscures racial factors in the therapy process. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 162–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hurd, T., & Brabeck, M. (1997). Presentation of women and Gilligan’s ethic of care in college textbooks, 1970–1990: An examination of bias. Teaching of Psychology, 24(3), 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jadack, R. A., Hyde, J. S., Moore, C. F., & Keller, M. L. (1995). Moral reasoning about sexually transmitted diseases. Child Development, 66, 167–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. (2000). Gender difference in moral orientation: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703–726.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnston, D. K. (1988). Adolescents’ solutions to dilemmas in fables: Two moral orientations—two problem-solving strategies. In C. Gilligan, J. V. Ward, & J. M. Taylor (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain (pp. 49–72). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Kitchener, K. S., & King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handhook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  46. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  47. Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development. The Psychology of Moral Development, Vol. 2. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  48. Kohlberg, L., & Kramer, R. (1969). Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development. Human Development, 12, 93–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krebs, D. L., Vermeulen, S. C, Denton, K. L., & Carpendale, J. I. (1994). Gender and perspective differences in moral judgement and moral orientation. Journal of Moral Education, 23(1), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Labouvie-Vief, G. (1982). Dynamic development and mature autonomy. A theoretical prologue. Human Development, 25, 161–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liddell, D. L. (1990). The measure of moral orientation. (Available from author, University of Iowa, Division of Counseling, Rehabilitation and Student Development, Iowa City, IA 52242).Google Scholar
  52. Liddell, D. L. (1998). Comparison of semi-structured interviews with a quantitative measure of moral orientation. Journal of College Student Development, 39(2), 169–178.Google Scholar
  53. Luttrell, W. (1989). Working-class women’s ways of knowing: Effects of gender, race and class. Sociology of Education, 62, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lyons, N. (1983). Two perspectives: On self, relationship and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 125–145.Google Scholar
  55. Lyons, N. (1988). Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality. In C. Gilligan, J. Ward, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain (pp. 21–48). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Meyers, D. T. (1996). Emotion and heterodox moral perception: An essay in moral psychology. In D. T. Meyers (Ed.), Feminists rethink the self. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  58. Morawski, J. G. (1985). The measurement of masculinity and feminity: Engendering categorical realities. Journal of Personality, 53(2), 196–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moshman, D., & Timmons, M. (1982). The construction of logical necessity. Human Development, 25, 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nicholson, J. (1984). Men and women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Noddings, S. N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  62. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  63. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  65. Riegel, K. F. (1979). Foundations of dialectical psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  66. Rogers, A., Brown, L., & Tappan, M. (1994). Interpreting loss in ego development in girls: Regression or resistance? In A. Lieblich & R. Josselson (Eds.), Exploring identity and gender: The narrative study of lives, Vol. 2 (pp. 1–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Ruddick, S. (1989). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  68. Sinnott, J. (1981). The theory of relativity: A metatheory for development? Human Development, 25, 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Skoe, E. E., & Diessner, R. (1994). Ethic of care, justice, identity and gender: An extension and replication. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 40(2), 272–289.Google Scholar
  70. Skoe, E. E., & Marcia, J. E. (1991). A care-based measure of morality and its relation to ego identity. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37, 289–304.Google Scholar
  71. Skoe, E. E., Pratt, M. W., Matthews, M., & Curror, S. E. (1996). The ethic of care: Stability over time, gender differences, and correlates in mid- to late adulthood. Psychology of Aging, 11(2), 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Snarey, J. (1998). Ego development and the ethical voices of justice and care: An Eriksonian interpretation. In P. M. Westenberg, A. Blasi, & L. D. Cohn (Eds.), Personality development: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical investigations of Loevinger’s conception of ego development. (pp. 163–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  73. Sochting, I., Skoe, E. E., & Marcia, J. E. (1994). Care-oriented moral reasoning and prosocial behavior: A question of gender or sex role orientation. Sex Roles, 31(3/4), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Strapp, J. (1974). The personal attributes questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 42 (No. 617).Google Scholar
  75. Spencer, H. (1875). The psychology of the sexes. Popular Science Monthly, 4, 30–38.Google Scholar
  76. Sutton, R. E., Cafarelli, A., Lund, R., Schurdell, D., & Bichsei, S. (1996). A developmental constructivist approach to pre-service teachers’ ways of knowing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 413–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thoma, S. (1986). Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues. Developmental Review, 62, 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Unger, R. (1989). Representations: Social construction of gender. Amityville, NY: Baywood.Google Scholar
  79. Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review. Child Development, 55, 677–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Walker, L. J. (1986). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A rejoinder to Baumrind. Child Development, 57, 522–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Walker, L. J. (1989). A longitudinal study of moral reasoning. Child Development, 60,157–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Walker, L. J. (1991). Sex differences in moral reasoning. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  83. Walker, L. J., deVries, B., & Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas. Child Development, 58, 842–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Walker, L. J., Pitts, R. C, Hennig, K. H., & Matsuba, M. K. (1995). Reasoning about morality and real-life moral problems. In M. Killen & D. Hart (Eds.), Morality in everyday life: Developmental perspectives (pp. 371–405). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Wark, G. P., & Krebs, D. L. (1996). Gender and dilemma differences in real-life moral judgment. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Widick, C, & Simpson, D. (1978). Development concepts in college instruction. In C. A. Parker (Ed.), Encouraging development in college students (pp. 27–59). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  87. White, J. (1994). Individual characteristics and social knowledge in ethical reasoning. Psychological Reports, 75, 627–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wood, P. (1985). A statistical examination of necessary but not sufficient antecedants of problem solving behavior (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2055.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary M. Brabeck
    • 1
  • Erika L. Shore
    • 1
  1. 1.Lynch School of EducationBoston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations