Advertisement

Epistemic Mediators and Model-Based Discovery in Science

  • Lorenzo Magnani

Abstract

What I call theoretical abduction (sentential and model-based) certainly illustrates much of what is important in abductive reasoning, especially the objective of selecting and creating a set of hypotheses that are able to dispense good (preferred) explanations of data, but fails to account for many cases of explanations occurring in science or in everyday reasoning when the exploitation of the environment is crucial. The concept of manipulative abduction is devoted to capture the role of action and of external representations in many interesting situations: action provides otherwise unavailable information that enables the agent to solve problems by starting and performing a suitable abductive process of generation or selection of hypotheses. I will present some aspects of this kind of reasoning derived from the “cognitive” history of the discovery of the non-Euclidean geometries. Geometrical diagrams are considered external representations which play both a mirror role (to externalize rough mental models), and an unveiling role (as gateways to imaginary entities). I describe them as epistemic mediators able to perform various abductive tasks (discovery of new properties or new propositions/hypotheses, provision of suitable sequences of models as able to convincingly verifying theorems, etc.).

Keywords

Belief Revision External Representation Spatial Transformation Spherical Triangle Abductive Reasoning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boi, L., 1991,Le probléme mathématique de l’espace. Une quéite de l’intelligible, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  2. Boutilier, C. and Becher, V., 1995, Abduction as belief revision, Artificial intelligence, 77:43–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Call, J., 2000, Representing space and objects in monkeys and apes,Cognitive Science 24(3):397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Giere, R., 2002, Models as parts of distributed cognitive systems, in this volume, pp. 227–241.Google Scholar
  5. Glasgow, J.I. and Papadias, D., 1992, Computational imagery, Cognitive Science 16:355–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoffmann, M., 1999, Problems with Peirce’s concept of abduction,Foundations of Science 4(3): 271–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoffmann, M., forthcoming, How to get it. Diagrammatic reasoning as a tool of knowledge development and its pragmatic dimension, in: Special Issue Abductive Reasoning in Science, Foundations of Science, L. Magnani and N.J. Nersessian, eds.Google Scholar
  8. Hutchins, E., 1995, Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Kant, L, 1929, Critique of Pure Reason (1781–1787), translation by N. Kemp Smith, Mac-Millan, New York, reprint 1998.Google Scholar
  10. Lobachevsky, N.J., 18291830, 18351838, Zwei geometrische Abhandlungen, aus dem Russischen bersetzt, mit Anmerkungen und mit einer Biographie des Verfassers von Friedrich Engel, B.G. Teubner, Leipzig. Originally published as O nachalakh geometrii, Kasanki Vestnik, Feb.-March, 1829: 178187; April, 1829: 228241; Nov.-Dec., 1829: 227243; March-April, 1830: 251283; July-Aug., 1830: 571636, and Novye nachala geometrii, Uchonia sapiski Kasanskava Universiteta 3, 1835: 348; 2, 1836: 398; 3, 1836: 350; 1, 1837: 397; 1, 1838: 3124; 3, 1838: 365.Google Scholar
  11. Lobachevsky, N.J., 1891, Geometrical Researches on the Theory of Paralleles [1840], translated by G.B. Halsted, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  12. Lobachevsky, N.J., 1897, The introduction to Lobachevsky’s New Elements of Geometry [1835], translation from the Russian, with a preface by G.B. Halsted, Transactions of Texas Academy 2:117. Originally published in: N.J. Lobachevsky, Novye nachala geometrii, Uchonia sapiski Kasanskava Universiteta 3, 1835: 3–48.Google Scholar
  13. Lobachevsky, N.J., 1929, Pangeometry or a Summary of Geometry Founded upon a General and Rigorous Theory of Parallels, in: A Source Book in Mathematics, D.E. Smith, ed., McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 360–374.Google Scholar
  14. Magnani, L., 1992, Abductive reasoning: philosophical and educational perspectives in medicine, in: Advanced Models of Cognition for Medical Training and Practice, D. A. Evans and V.L. Patel, eds., Springer, Berlin, pp. 21–41.Google Scholar
  15. Magnani, L., 1999a, Creative abduction and hypothesis withdrawal in science, in: Methodo logical Aspects of Discovery and Creativity, J. Meheus and T. Nickles, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  16. Magnani, L., 1999b, Model-based creative abduction, in: L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian, and P. Thagard, eds., pp. 219–238.Google Scholar
  17. Magnani, L., 2000, Action-based abduction in science, in: Workshop Scientific Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy of Science, ECAI 2000 Workshop Notes, A. Aliseda and D. Pearce, eds., Berlin, pp. 46–51.Google Scholar
  18. Magnani, L., 2001a, Abduction, Reason, and Science. Processes of Discovery and Explanation, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Magnani, L., 2001b, Philosophy and Geometry. Theoretical and Historical Issues, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  20. Magnani, L., N.J. Nersessian, and Thagard, P., eds., 1999, Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Magnani, L. and Dossena, R., 2002, Perceiving the infinite and the infinitesimal world: unveiling and optical diagrams and the construction of mathematical concepts, submitted to CogSei2002.Google Scholar
  22. Nersessian, N.J., 1995a, Opening the black box: cognitive science and history of science. Technical Report GIT-COGSCI 94/23, July. Cognitive Science Report Series, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA. Partially published in: Osiris 10:194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nersessian, N.J., 1995b, Should physicists preach what they practice? Constructive modeling in doing and learning physics, Science and Education 4:203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nersessian, N.J., 1998, Kuhn and the cognitive revolution, Configurations 6:87–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nersessian, N.J., 1999, Model-based reasoning in conceptual change, in: L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian, and P. Thagard, eds., pp. 522.Google Scholar
  26. Newell, A., 1990, Unified Theories of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  27. Norman, D.A., 1993, Things that Make Us Smart. Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Peirce, C.S., 19311958(CP), Collected Papers, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne and P Weiss (vols. I-VI), eds., and A.W. Burks (vols. VII-VIII), ed.. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Piaget, J., 1974, Adaptation and Intelligence, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  30. Ramoni, M., Stefanelli, M., Magnani, L., and Barosi, G., 1992, An epistemological framework for medical knowledge-based systems,IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 22(6):1361–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenfeld, B.A., 1988, A History of Non-Euclidean Geometry. Evolution of the Concept of a Geometric Space (1976), Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tall, D., forthcoming, Conceptual and formal infinities, Educational Studies in Mathematics.Google Scholar
  33. Thagard, P., 1992, Conceptual Revolutions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  34. Torretti, R., 1978, Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré, Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trafton, J.G., Trickett, S.B., and Mintz, F.E., forthcoming,, Connecting internal and external representations: spatial transformations of scientific visualizations, in: Special Iissue Model_Based Reasoning: Visual, Analogical, Simulative, Foundations of Science, L. Magnani and N.J. Nersessian, eds.Google Scholar
  36. Zhang, J., 1997, The nature of external representations in problem solving, Cognitive Science 21(2):179–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang, J. and Norman, D.A., 1994, Representations in distributed cognitive tasks, Cognitive Science 18:87–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Magnani
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Computational Philosophy LaboratoryUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
  2. 2.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations