Advertisement

Vickers’ Concept of Relationship-Maintaining and the Nature of Regulation

  • Daune West

Abstract

In their text, Client-led Design, Stowell and West (1994) suggested that Vickers’ concept of relationship-maintaining might provide a basis of a concept of organisation that was more appropriate to interpretive IS work than the ‘traditional’ goal-seeking view of organisation. Whilst they may have gone one step further than Walsham (1993) in trying to make explicit the model of organisation their work implied, they failed to develop the model beyond a description of the nature of appreciation and its application in IS work. More recently, Checkland and Holwell (1998) have set down what they refer to as the “conventional wisdom model of ‘an organisation’ in much of the IS literature” (p82), which is based upon the pursuit of organisational goals, and compare this with what they propose as “a richer model of the concept of ‘an organisation’ than the ‘conventional wisdom’ [model]” (ibid., p83). Their ‘conventional wisdom’ model is based upon the premise that organizations are taken to exist as entities in the ‘real world’; that is, they are treated as “a conscious, person-like entity capable of unitary purposeful action” (ibid., p82). In this model, organizational members are considered to understand and share the organization’s aims and objectives, and consequently, work within the organization to attain these objectives. Objective attainment is commonly expressed through the concepts and language of ‘goal-seeking’. Checkland and Holwell state that “Philosophically, this is a positivistic model, sociologically, a functionalist one” (ibid., p82).

Keywords

Conventional Wisdom Organizational Member Single Goal Rich Model Causal Loop Diagram 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Checkland, P.B. and Casar, A. (1986). “Vickers’ concept of an appreciative system: a systemic account,”Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 13:3–17.Google Scholar
  2. Checkland, P.B. and Holwell, S. (1998).Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  3. Stowell, F.A. and West, D. (1994).Client-led Design: A Systemic Approach to Information Systems Definition, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.Google Scholar
  4. Vickers, G. (1965).The Art of Judgement: A Study of Policy Making, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  5. Vickers, G. (1970).Freedom in a Rocking Boat: Changing Values in an Unstable Society, Penguin Books Ltd, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  6. Walsham, G. (1993).Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daune West
    • 1
  1. 1.Computing and Information SystemsUniversity of PaisleyUK

Personalised recommendations