Advertisement

Introduction to Knowledge Profiling

  • M. Yolles

Abstract

Viable system theory is a cybernetic approach that is concerned with autonomous, active, purposeful, and adaptive social organisation that can operate in complex situations and survive. Since complex situations entail variety differentiation, in surviving a viable system responds to changing situations by generating sufficient variety through self-organisation to deal with the situational variety it encounters (called requisite variety). A viable organisation is able to support adaptability and change while maintaining stability in its behaviour. In particular an organisation is viable if it can maintain stable states of behaviour as it adapts to perturbations from its environment.

Keywords

Knowledge Management Cognitive Domain Knowledge Creation Behavioural Domain Knowledge Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belbin, M. (1996). The Coming Shape of Organization, Butterworth-Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  2. Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and Practice, Heinamann, London.Google Scholar
  3. Iles, P. and Yolles, M. (2001). “HRM and Knowledge Management: responding to the challenge”, Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 9(l):3-33.Google Scholar
  4. lles, P.A. and Yolles, M. (2000). “Across the Great Divide: HRD, technology translation and knowledge migration in bridging the knowledge gap between SMEs and Universities”, Human Resource Development International, 4(1) 1-35, ISSN 13678868Google Scholar
  5. lles, P.A., Yolles, M. and Altman, Y., 2000, HRM and Knowledge Management: responding to the challenge. Journal of Research and Practice in HRM (Special Issue on Knowledge Management - invited paper) 8(2)1-31Google Scholar
  6. Kolb, D.A., (1974). Organisational Psychology: An Experiential Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  7. Marshall, S.P. (1995). Schemes in Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marshall, S.P., Wilson, D., M., Knust, S.K., Smith, M.E., Garcia, R.J., 2000, Shared Decision-Making Knowledge in Tactical Situations, Sept. C4ISR Coop. Res. Prog. Conf. available at:http//www.dodccrp.org/Proceedings/DOCS/wcd00000/wcd000e5.htmGoogle Scholar
  9. Sorokin, P.A., 1937, Social and Cultural Dynamics. Amer. Book. Co. N.Y.Google Scholar
  10. Schutz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1974). The Structures of the Lifeworld, Heinemann, London. http://sites.netscape.net/mcyrhul/intelligent_organisations.htmlGoogle Scholar
  11. Yolles, M.I. (1999). Management Systems: A Viable Approach, Financial Times Pitman, London.Google Scholar
  12. Yolles, M.I. (2000a). “The Theory of Viable Joint Ventures”, Cybernetics andSys, 3l(4):37l-396.Google Scholar
  13. Yolles, M.I. (2000b). “The Viable Theory of Knowledge Management”, Research Memorandum of the Janus Centre for Res. in Mgt Sys and Cybernetics, 3(1), Info. Management Centre, Liverpool Business School.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Yolles
    • 1
  1. 1.Liverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations