Advertisement

Necessity, Challenges, and Promises of Peer-To-Peer Architecture of Information Systems

  • Jaroslav Král
  • Michal Žemlička

Abstract

Information systems of large enterprises and/or organizations must be a confederation, i.e. it must have the structure of a peer-to-peer network of large autonomous components. We show the reasons why such a structure is necessary and what advantages it has not only in the case of large information systems. Challenges and software engineering problems (e.g. metrics for CMM) are discussed. The consequences for the education of both software experts and the “common” users of information technologies are mentioned.

Keywords

Multiagent System Resource Description Framework Message Format Autonomous Component Global Information System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aho, A.V., Ullman, J.D., 1972, The Theory of Parsing, Translation, and Compiling, Vol. 1. Parsing, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. ISBN 0-13-914556.Google Scholar
  2. Fisher, K., Oliveria, E., Štěpánková, O., 2000, Multiagent Systems: Which Research for which Applications. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  3. Howlett, D., 1996, Lawson adds web and workflow. PCUser, 16 Oct. 199 6.Google Scholar
  4. Král, J., 1999, Architecture of open information systems. In: Evolution and Challenges in Systems Developments, Županič, J., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Wrycza, S. (eds.) Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 131–138. ISBN 0-306-46053-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Král, J., Töpfer, P., 2000, Education of software experts for a changing world. In: Proceedings of 2nd Global Congress on Engineering Education, Pudlowski, Z., J. (ed.) Wismar, Germany.Google Scholar
  6. Král, J., Žemlička, M., 2001, Education of Software Experts and the Second Literacy. To appear at the workshop of the PSI 2001 conference, Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
  7. MFF working proposal of bachelor education in computer science, MFF, Charles University, Prague, February 2001, unpublished.Google Scholar
  8. Pokorný, J., 2000, XML: A Challenge for Databases? Presented at ISD 2000. To appear.Google Scholar
  9. RDF, 1999, Resource Description Framework. A Proposal of the W3C consorcium. http://www.rdf.com/.Google Scholar
  10. Sochor, J., 2001, The Study 3+2. (in Czech: Studium 3+2), Draft position statement on the restructuring of the curricula at the Faculty of Informatics of Masaryk University of Brno. FI MU, unpublished.Google Scholar
  11. UML, 1999, Home page containing links to the proposed standard of UML, http://uml.systemhouse.mci.com/artifacts.Google Scholar
  12. Weiss, G., 1999, Multiagent Systems. A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  13. Winograd, T., Flores, F. C., 1986, Understanding Computers and Cognition - a New Foundation for Design. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NY.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaroslav Král
  • Michal Žemlička
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and PhysicsCharles University, PraguePraha 1Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations