Some Remarks on the Theory of Relativity and the Naïve Realism
Chapter
Abstract
The physics of the first part of the twentieth century has changed our image of the universe in a very profound way. Probably those changes have been more dramatic than those created by the birth of modern science during the seventeenth century. In fact during the seventeenth century the Aristotelic philosophy was rejected as the basic framework in which it was possible to organize known facts. The new ideas of this century have changed our image of the universe in an even more drastic way: not only has the Newtonian paradigm been rejected but also so have the basic categories of our knowledge:

space is not Euclidean

time does not flow with the same speed in any part of the universe: the notion of contemporareity makes no sense and hence any distinction between past and future is meaningless

space and time are mixed together

there is an absolute constant (ħ) which fixes a priori the limits of our knowledge

the material world does not have any reality per se, but instead reality exists as consequence of the operation of measurement performed by an observer (at least at atomic level).

measurements determine not only the present and the future, but also the past (Delayed Choice Experiments).
Keywords
Solitary Wave Euclidean Geometry Absolute Time Absolute Space Poincare Group
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
 [1]A. ABBONDANDOLO, V.BENCI,Solitary waves and Bohmian mechanics, to appear on Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
 [2]J. BELL,Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1987).MATHGoogle Scholar
 [3]V. BENCI,Quantum phenomena in a classical model, Foundations of Physics, Foundation of Physics, 29,1–29(1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [4]V. BENCI, D. FORTUNATO,Solitons and Particles, to appear on Proc. “International Conference on Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applica tions” Tata Inst, of Fundamental research, Bangalore, India (August 1996).Google Scholar
 [5]V. BENCI, D. FORTUNATO,Solitons and relativistic dynamics, in. Calculus of Variations and Partial differential equations,.G.Buttazzo, A.Marino and M.K.V. Murty editors, Springer (1999), 285–326.Google Scholar
 [6]V. BENCI, D. FORTUNATO,A new variational principle for the fundamental equations of classical physics, Foundations of Physics, 28 (1998), 333–352MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [7]V. BENCI, D. FORTUNATO,On the existence of the impossible pilot wave, in Calculus of variationd and differential equations, Ioffe, Reich and Shafrir ed., Chapman & Hall/CRC, (1998), 1–20.Google Scholar
 [8]V. BENCI, D. FORTUNATO,On the equality between gravitational and in ertial mass, to appear onGeometry and Physics, P.Freguglia, G Turehetti ed..Google Scholar
 [9]V. BENCI, D. FORTUNATO, A. MASIELLO, L. PISANI,Solitons and electro magnetic field, Math. Zeit.,232, (1999), 73–102.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [10]V. BENCI, D. FORTUNATO, L. PISANI,Soliton like solution of a Lorentz in variant equation in dimension 3, Reviews in Mathematical Physics,3(1998), 315–344.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [11]V. BENCI, D. FORTUNATO, L. PISANI,Remarks on topological solitons, Topological methods in nonlinear Analysis,7(1996), 349–367.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 [12]V. BENCI, F. GIANNONI, P. PICCIONE,A variational problem for manifold valued functionals, Adv. In Diff. Eq., 5, (2000), 369–400.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 [13]H. BERESTYCKI, P.L. LIONS, Nonlinear Scalar Field Equations, I  Exis tence of a Ground State, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.,82(4) (1983), 313–345.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 [14]D. BÖHM, B. HILEY,The Undivided Universe, Routledge, London (1994).Google Scholar
 [15]L. DE BROGLIE, Un tentative d’interprétation causale et non linéaire de la Mécanique ondulatoire: la théorie de la double solution, GauthierVillars, Paris, 1958.Google Scholar
 L. De Broglie English traslation: Nonlinear wave mechanics, a causal Inter pretation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1960.Google Scholar
 [16]C.H. DERRICK,Comments on Nonlinear Wave Equations as Model for Elementary Particles, Jour. Math. Phys. 5 (1964), 1252–1254.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [17]I.M. GELFAND, S.V. FOMIN,Calculus of Variations, PrenticeHall, Engle wood Cliffs, N.J. 1963.Google Scholar
 [18]P. R. HOLLAND,The Quantm Theory of motion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993, (last reprint 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [19]LANDAU L.,LIFCHITZ E.,Théorie du Champ, Editions Mir, Moscow, 1966.MATHGoogle Scholar
 [20]O’ NEILL,Semiriemannian Geometry with application to Relativity, Aca demic Press Inc., New YorkLondon, 1983.Google Scholar
 [21]PENROSE R.,Review of “The Quanum World” by J.C. Polkinghorne,The Times Higher Education Supplement, March 23, 1984.Google Scholar
 [22]POPPER K. R.,Unended quest, an intellectual biography, FontanaCollins, Glasgow, 1976, p.129.Google Scholar
 [23]F. SELLERI, Found. Phys. 26, (1996), p. 641MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [24]F. SELLEEI, On a Phisical and Mathematical Discontinuity in Relatvity Theory, in Open questions in Relativistic Physics, F. Selleri ed., Apeiron, Montreal, (1998), 69–80.Google Scholar
 [25]F. SELLERI,La fisica del Novecento. Per un bilancio critico, Progedit snc, Bari(1999).Google Scholar
 [26]J. SHATAH, Stable Standing waves of Nonlinear KleinGordon Equations, Comm. Math. Phys., 91, (1983, 313–327.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002