Abstract
Previous studies have confirmed the presence of an attentional bias in phobic subjects’ reaction to threatening stimuli compared to neutral ones (3,11,12). This bias has been demonstrated in most diagnosis belonging to anxiety disorders: social phobia (10), panic disorder (15), generalised anxiety disorder (12), post traumatic stress disorders (6),spider phobia (11). Subliminal exposure of words or pictures perceived as visual flashes can produce interference in the treatment of information revealing activated automatic mechanisms in pre-attentional processes (3,9,16). Recent models have proposed the presence of a route that operates independently of awareness giving an automatic attentional priority to threat. In this context, Mathews and Mackintosh (1998) studied the presence of an active cerebral mechanism «threat evaluation system» that automatically evaluated the threat at «an early, non verbal stage of perception» The model is thus consistent with evidence suggesting anxiety-related interference effects from threatening words or pictures presented out of awareness. These authors assumed that the activation of representations associated with potential danger is increased by input from a threat evaluation system which is similar to ÖHMAN (1994) significance evaluator,for the latter, pictures of feared objects like spiders or snakes, even if they are masked, caused greater skin conductance reponses in phobic than in non phobic subjects (16).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agathon M. and Brouri R. (1983). Analyse factorielle d’une échelle de peurs, la FSSIII sur une population psychiatrique. Revue de psycholo. appl., 33, 15, 915–918.
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (4th,ed.) Washington DC.
Azaïs F .(1995). Approche cognitive et expérimentale des troubles anxieux. L’Encéphale; XXI: 597– 607.
Beck A. and Emery G. with Greenberg R. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias, a cognitive perspec- tive, Library of congress, U.S.A.
Bornstein R. and Pittman T. (1992). Perception without awareness; cognitive, clinical and social per- spectives; The Guilford Press, New York.
Bryant R A, Harvey A G (1995). Processing threatening information in post traumatic stress disorder, Journal of abnormal Psychology, Aug, 104: 3, 573–41.
Downing C.& Pinker S. (1992). The spatial structure of visual attention in Lecas J.C: L’attention visuelle, de la conscience aux neurosciences, Pierre Mardaga, Liège.
Foa E., Franklin M., Perry K., Herbert J. (1996). «Cognitive Biases in Generalized Social Phobia»; Journal of abnormal psychology, vol. 105, no. 3, 433–439.
Heimberg R. et al. (1995). Social phobia: diagnosis, assessment and treatement, The Guilford Press, U.S.A.
Hope D. A., Rapee R. M., Hemberg R. G. &s Dombeck M. J. (1990). Representations of the self in social phobia: vulnerability to social threat. Cognitive therapy and research; 14, 177–189.
Lavy E., Vandenttout M., Arntz A. (1993). Attentional bias and spider phobia: conceptual and clinical issues, Behav Res Ther.; Jan, 31:1, 17–24.
Macleod C., Mathews A. Tata P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of abnormal psychology; 95–15–20.
Macleod C. and Mc Laughlin K. (1995). Implicit and explicit memory bias in anxiety: a conceptual replication; Behavior Research Therapy, Jan, 33: 1, 1–14.
Mathews A. and Mackintosh B. (1998). A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety, in cogni- tive therapy and research, vol. 22, no 6, 1998 pp ; 539–560.
McNally R. J., Rienmann B. C., Kim E. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in panic disorder. Behavior research and therapy, 28: 5, 407–12.
Öhman A. and Soares J. (1994). Unconscious Anxiety: Phobic Responses to Masked Stimuli. Journal of abnormal psychology, vol. 103, n. 2, 231–240.
Watts F. N., Coyle K. (1993). Phobics show poor recall of anxiety words. Br. J. Med. Psychol., Dec.,66 (pt 4): 373–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mansour, C., Rabbath, G., Saïkali, M. (2002). Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Phobics’ Attentional Bias after Subliminal Presentation of Threatening Stimuli. In: Scrimali, T., Grimaldi, L. (eds) Cognitive Psychotherapy Toward a New Millennium. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0567-9_55
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0567-9_55
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5135-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0567-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive