The Soteria Project: Twenty Five Years of Swimming Upriver

  • Loren R. Mosher
  • John R. Bola

Abstract

Four years after it opened in 1971 the Soteria Project first published outcome data indicating that lst and 2nd episode persons labeled as having schizophrenia could be successfully treated in a special milieu without the use of the neuroleptic drugs(Mosher et al 1975). In the intervening 25 years the project has continued to publish papers (40 in all) confirming and extending the initial results (see especially Mosher and Menn,1978; Matthews, et al 1979; and Mosher, et al 1995). These findings continue to challenge many firmly held beliefs about how best to intervene with persons labeled as having “schizophrenia”. This methodologically rigorous study is providing, once again, an opportunity to question today’s neuroleptic dominated treatment with new analyses of two year outcomes, which will be briefly presented here (Bola and Mosher, 1999, 2000). Needless to say this study’s results have been not welcomed with open arms in the American mental health community. The study’s results challenge the basic tenets of the mental health community with regard to “schizophrenia”: the need for hospitalization, the necessity of mental health professionals as the primary caregivers and, most importantly, the universal use of the anti-psychotic drugs. So, it is not at all surprising that the study has been treated as if it were never conducted. In fact, the neglect of this study and its findings in the literature and in the treatment of psychotic persons is itself striking. Hence the title: 25 years of swimming upriver against the prevailing biological Zeitgeist, into the current of the ways in which dominant paradigms prevent contrary opinions from being heard or given credence (Kuhn, 1970).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alanen, Y.O., Rosenbaum, B., Ugelstad, E., Armelius, B., Lehtinen, K.&Sjostrom,. R (1994). Early treatment of schizophrenic patients: Scandinavian psychotherapeutic approaches. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bola,J.& Mosher, L.R. (1999). Predicting drug free response in acute psychosis from the Soteria pro- ject. Paper presented at the XI World Congress of Psychiatry, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  3. Bola, J.& Mosher, L.R. (2000). Treatment of Acute Psychosis without Neuroleptics: Two-year outco- mes from the Soteria Project. Paper Presented at the 10th Biennial Winter Workshop on Schizophrenia, Davos, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  4. Ciompi, L., Duwalder, H.P., Maier, C., Aebi, E., Trutsch, K., Kupper, Z. & Rutishauser. (1992). The pilot project “Soteria Berne”: Clinical experiences and results. British Journal of Psychiatry, 161 (suppl. 18), 145–153.Google Scholar
  5. Frank, J.D. (1973). Persuasion and healing: A comparitive study of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Garden City N.Y.: Anchor.Google Scholar
  7. Hirschfeld, R.M., Matthews, S.M., Mosher, L.R. & Menn, A.Z. (1977). Being with madness: Personality characteristics of three treatment staffs. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 28, 267–273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuhn, T. S. (1970) (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Laing, R.D. (1967). The politics of experience. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  10. Matthews, S.M., Roper, M.T., Mosher, L.R. & Menn, A.Z. (1979). A non-neuroleptic treatment for schizophrenia: Analysis of the two-year post-discharge risk of relapse. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 5, 322– 333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mosher, L.R. (1999). Soteria and other alternatives to acute hospitalization: A personal and professio- nal review. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 187, 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mosher, L.R. & Burti, L. (1994). Community mental health: A practical guide. N.Y.: Norton.Google Scholar
  13. Mosher, L.R., Menn, A.Z., & Matthews, S. (1975). Soteria: Evalution of a home based treatment for schizophrenia. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45, 455–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mosher, L.R. & Menn, A.Z. (1978). Community residential treatment for schizophrenia: Two-year fol- low-up. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 29, 715–723.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mosher, L.R., Menn, A.Z., Vallone, R. & Fort, D. (1994). Dabeisein-Das Manual zur Praxis in der Soteria. Bonn: Psychiatrie-Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Mosher, L.R., Reifman, A. & Menn A, (1973). Characteristics of non-professionals serving as primary therapists for acute schizophrenics. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 24:391–396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mosher, L.R., Vallone, R. & Menn, A.Z. (1992). The Soteria Project: Final progress report; R01MH35928, R12MH20123 and R12MH25570. Submitted to the NIMH. (Available from the author).Google Scholar
  18. Mosher, L.R., Vallone, R. & Menn, A.Z.(1995). The treatment of acute psychosis without neuroleptics: Six-week psychopathology outcome data from the Soteria project. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 41, 157–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sullivan, H.S. (1962). Schizophrenia as a human process. N.Y.: Norton.Google Scholar
  20. Wilson, H.S. (1978). Conjoint becoming: Study of Soteria II. In: Current perspectives in psychiatric nursing, vol. II. (pp. 135–148). St. Louis: C.V Mosby.Google Scholar
  21. Wilson, H.S. (1983). Usual hospital treatment in the USA’s Community Mental Health System. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 20, 176–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Loren R. Mosher
    • 1
    • 2
  • John R. Bola
    • 3
  1. 1.Director, Soteria Associates San DiegoCAUSA
  2. 2.Clinical Professor of Psychiatry School of Medicine University of California at San DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Assistant Professor School of Social Work University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations