Abstract
The classical physicist‘s view, with its roots in the 17th century physics that matured under Isaac Newton, has influenced biology and psychology, an influence that began in the 19th century and still continues, although somewhat abated. The most devastating consequence of this metaphysical view (called material realism) of biological and psychological beings, which includes us, is that all our subjective experiences, indeed, our minds and consciousness, are regarded as meaningless epiphenomena of matter—only matter is real. This means that the dance of the elementary particles of matter is the real thing; mind and consciousness are merely ornamental, having no causal efficacy. “A physicist is [merely] an atom‘s way of knowing about atoms,” says the classical physicist. (The biologist puts this epiphenomenalism slightly differently; “A human being is a gene‘s way of knowing about genes.”)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Grinberg, J., et al. “Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox in the Human Brain: The Transferred Potential.‘Physics Essays, vol. 7, pp. 422-428. 1994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goswami, A. (2001). Can We Determine the Metaphysics Underlying Reality?. In: The Physicists’ View of Nature. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0527-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0527-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46509-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0527-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive