Abstract
Computational methods in support of decision making have grown greatly in power during recent decades owing in large measure to Moore’s Law. Nothing like this law operates in the realm of mathematical models, which has led to an increasingly lopsided “mind share” in favor of computation at the expense of mathematics among decision support system developers. The increased emphasis on computational methods is a mixed blessing, for these seldom excel at revealing why the solutions they yield are what they are. Yet in many situations, decision makers and policy makers need to understand the why behind these solutions in order to convince themselves and others of the need for action or to deepen their own understanding of the system under study. This chapter advocates conceptually simple models, arguments, and spreadsheets as adjuncts to complex computational models to help explain important aggregate properties of detailed computational solutions. This can improve the transparency, and hence the value, of such solutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bos, C., Spatial Dispersion of Economic Activity, Rotterdam University Press, 1965.
Cobham, A., “Priority Assignment in Waiting Line Problems,” Operations Research, 2:1 (February, 1954), pp. 70–76.
Geoffrion, A., “The Purpose of Mathematical Programming is Insight, Not Numbers,” Interfaces, 7:1 (November, 1976), pp. 81–92.
Geoffrion, A., “Making Better Use of Optimization Capability in Distribution System Planning,” AIIE Transactions, 11:2 (June, 1979), pp. 96–108.
Geoffrion, A. and R. Powers, “Twenty Years of Strategic Distribution System Design: An Evolutionary Perspective,” Interfaces, 25:5 (September-October, 1995), pp. 105–127.
Ignall, E., P. Kolesar and W. Walker, “Using Simulation to Develop and Validate Analytical Models,” Operations Research, 26:2 (March-April, 1978), pp. 237–253.
Penzias, A., “The Next Fifty Years: Some Likely Impacts of Solid-State Technology,” Bell Labs Technical Journal, 2:4 (Autumn, 1997), pp. 155–168.
Rutten, W., P. van Laarhoven, and B. Vos, “An Extension of the GOMA Model for Determining the Optimal Number of Depots,” HE Transactions, 33 (2001), pp. 1031–1036.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geoffrion, A. (2003). Restoring Transparency to Computational Solutions. In: Decision Modelling and Information Systems. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 26. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0505-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0505-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5110-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0505-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive