Skip to main content

Interruptible Physical Transmission Contract for the Deregulated Electric Power Industry

  • Chapter
Critical Infrastructures State of the Art in Research and Application

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 65))

  • 116 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a novel transmission congestion management protocol applicable for both pure-bilateral and hybrid electricity market structures. The mechanism is based on an Interruptible Physical Transmission Contract, which guarantees physical access to the transmission network users and provides financial incentives for the bilateral contract holders to forfeit the physical access to the transmission network. The contract specifies a financial reimbursement payable to the insured if the system operator dispatch results into a curtailment of a bilateral contract involving an injection into and withdrawal of power at a specified set of nodes. The insurer is compensated in the form of an insurance premium for providing the service. The contract is structured such that the reimbursement payable to the insured party equals the actual loss incurred so that the insured party is “made whole” with the insurance payment. Similarly, when the insurer is the System Operator itself, it tries to dispatch the generators such that the aggregate insurance reimbursements payable to the insured parties is minimized. In this way, the transmission contract mechanism ensures that a near optimal curtailment policy coincides with the efficient dispatch in the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alaywan Z. and Allen, J., 1998. California Electric Restructuring: A Broad Description of the Development of the California ISO. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 13(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen E., Ilić M., and Younes Z., 1999. Providing for Transmission in Times of Scarcity: an ISO Cannot Do it All. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 21, pp 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berstekas, D., 1995. Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control- Volume I, Athena Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessembinder, H. and Lemmon, M, 2002. Equilibrium Pricing and Optimal Hedging in Electricity Forward Markets. Journal of Finance, 55(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron L., Cramton P., and Wilson R., 1997. Using Auctions to Divest Generation Assets. Electricity Journal, 10(10), pp 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao H., Peck S., Oren S., and Wilson R., 2000. Flow-based Transmission Rights and Congestion Management. Electricity Journal, 13(8), pp 38–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J., Ross S., and Rubinstein M., 1979. Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, pp 229–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramton P., 1998. Ascending Auctions. European Economic Review, 42(3–5), pp 745–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng S. and Oren S., 2000. Priority Network Access Pricing for Electric Power. University of California Energy Institute Working Paper. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedra T. and Varaiya, P., 1993. Markets and Pricing for Interruptible Electric Power. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 8(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey S., Hogan W., and Pope S., 1997. Transmission Capacity Reservations and Transmission Congestion Contracts. Harvard Electricity Policy Group Working Paper. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan W., 2000. Flowgate Rights and Wrongs. Harvard Electricity Policy Group Working Paper. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J., 1999. Options, Futures, & Other Derivatives. 4th ed. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull J. and White A., 1994. Numerical Procedures for Implementing Term Structure Models I: Single-Factor Models. Journal of Derivatives, 2(1), pp 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilić M. and Galiana F., 1998. Power Systems Operation Old v. New. In: M. Ilić, F. Galiana, and L. Fink, eds. Power Systems Restructuring: Engineering and Economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 15–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaillet P., Ronn E., and Tompaidis S., 1998. Modeling Energy Prices and Pricing and Hedging Energy Derivatives. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow P. and Kahn E., 2001. A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California’s Wholesale Electricity Market during Summer 2000. MIT Center for Environmental and Economic Policy Research Working Paper. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P., 2000. Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending Auction. Journal of Political Economy, 108(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikar S. and Ilić M. Assessment of Transmission Congestion for Major Electricity Markets in the US. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Summer Power Meeting, 2001, Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz E., 1997. The Stochastic Behavior of Commodity Prices: Implications for Valuation and Hedging. Journal of Finance, 52(3), pp 923–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skantze P., Gubina A., and Ilić M., 2000. Bid-based Stochastic Model for Electricity Prices: The Impact of Fundamental Drivers on Market Dynamics. MIT Energy Laboratory Working Paper. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon Y., Raikar S., and Ilić M., 2000. Congestion Management for Large Electric Power Systems. In: 6th International Conference on Probability Methods Applied to Power Systems, Funchal, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon Y., 2001. Electric Power Network Economics: Designing Principles for For-profit Independent Transmission Company and Underlying Architecture for Reliability. Thesis (Ph.D.). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R., 1997. Implementation of Priority Insurance in Power Exchange Markets. Energy Journal 18(1), pp 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raikar, S., Skantze, P. (2003). Interruptible Physical Transmission Contract for the Deregulated Electric Power Industry. In: Thissen, W.A.H., Herder, P.M. (eds) Critical Infrastructures State of the Art in Research and Application. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 65. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0495-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0495-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5105-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0495-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics