Forward and Spot Buying: Yield Management of Information Goods

  • Pavan Gundepudi
  • Nils Rudi
  • Abraham Seidmann
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 63)

Abstract

Information goods are commonly sold either at spot prices or through forward buying at discounted fares. In this chapter, we consider a seller that offers an information good through spot buying, forward buying at a reduced price, or a combination of the two and address his yield management problem when he is either a price-taker or a price-setter. When the seller is a price-taker, the seller's choice is whether to offer the good for only forward buying, only spot buying, or a combination of the two. When the seller is a price-setter, the seller’s objective is to choose the offering(s) and the price level(s). For the price-taker case, we show that when both the spot price and the discount on forward buying are moderate in value, the seller chooses the mixed strategy of offering both forward and spot buying simultaneously. For non-moderate values of the prices, a pure strategy (offering only spot buying or only forward buying) is optimal. For the price-setter case, we show how those selling information goods can increase their revenues by using a mixed offering strategy. The mixed strategy lends itself to second-degree price discrimination by the seller when there are groups of customers potentially heterogeneous in terms of the distribution of their reservation prices.

Keywords

Transportation Hull Lost Mellon Monopoly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Altinkemer, K., Determining price of bundled information goods, Workshop of Information Sciences and Economics (WISE), Charlotte, NC, December 1999.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Altinkemer, K., and S. Bandhopadhyay, Bundling and distribution of digitized music over the Internet, Working Paper, Kran-nert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, July 1999.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bakos, Y. and E. Brynolfsson, Aggregating and disaggregating information goods: Implications for bundling, site licensing, and subscriptions, Proceedings of Internet Publishing and Beyond: The Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property. Cambridge, MA; Kennedy School of Government, 1997. Available at www.stern.nyu.edu/~bakos.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bakos, Y. and E. Brynolfsson, Bundling and competition on Internet, Marketing Science, Vol. 19, No. 1, Jan. 2000.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bhargava, H.K., and V. Choudhary Price discrimination and product differentiation in information goods, GSIA Working Paper 199–34, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, October 1999.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Chuang, J., and M. Sirbu Network delivery of information goods: optimal pricing of articles and subscriptions, Proceedings of Internet Publishing and Beyond: The Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property Cambridge, MA; Kennedy School of Government, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Dana, J.D., and N.C. Petruzzi, Note: The newsvendor model with endogenous demand, Management Science, Vol. 47, p. 1488–1497, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Deneckere, R.J., and R.P. McAfee, Damaged goods, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 5, No. 2, p.149–174, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Dudley, U., Two-year magazine subscription rates, American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 100, p. 34–37, Jan. 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Greenstein, J., The Web content conundrum, The Industry Standard, Jul. 03, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Gundepudi, P., N. Rudi, and A. Seidmann, Forward versus spot buying of information goods, Journal of Management & Information Systems, Vol.18, No.2, p. 103–127, Fall 2001.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hull, J.C., Introduction to Futures and Options Markets, Prentice Hall, 3rd edition, 1997.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Jones, R., and H. Mendelson, Product and price competition for information goods, Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Jan. 1998.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kennerdale, C., Content subscriptions are an uphill battle, EContent, Vol. 24, No.6, Aug. 2001.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    McAfee, R.P., J. McMillan, and M.D. Whinston, Multi-product monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, p. 371–384, May 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    McGarvey, T., Pay-per-view’s payback: cashing in with content, EContent, Vol. 24, No.6, Aug. 2001.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    McGill, J.I., and G.J. Van Ryzin, Revenue management: research overview and prospects, Transportation Science, Vol. 33, p. 233–256, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Pack, T., Automatic media shuts down content sites, EContent, Vol. 24, No.6, Aug. 2001.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Shugan, S.M., and X. Jinhong, Advance pricing of services and other implications of separating purchase and consumption, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 2, No.3, Feb. 2000.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Tang, C.S., K. Rajaram, and J. Ou, The benefits of advance booking discount programs: model and analysis, Working Paper, UCLA, April 1999.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Varian, H.R., Pricing information goods, Proc. Scholarship New Inform. Environment Symposium, Harvard School Law, Cambridge, MA, 1995. Available at http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~hal/.
  22. [22]
    Varian, H.R., Differential pricing and efficiency, First Monday, Vol.1, No.2, Aug. 1996.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Varian, H.R., Versioning information goods, Working Paper, March 1997. Available at http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~hal/.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pavan Gundepudi
    • 1
  • Nils Rudi
    • 1
  • Abraham Seidmann
    • 1
  1. 1.William E. Simon School of Business AdministrationUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations