Emissions during the Co-combustion of Lignite and Waste Wood in a Fluidised Bed Reactor
Co-combustion tests were performed in a lab-scale fluidised bed reactor, in order to define (a) the optimum percentage for substituting Greek lignite by waste wood, and (b) the operation conditions ensuring complete burnout of the fuel blends. Tests were performed at the experimental facility of the NTUA’s Steam Boilers and Thermal Plants Laboratory (NTUA-LSB). Pre-dried lignite, from Ptolemais reserve, and various waste wood species, i.e. uncontaminated wood, demolition timber and railway sleepers, were used to prepare the fuel blends. In all tests, the emissions in flue gases - CO, SO2, N2O, NOx, NO, NO2 and CXHY — were continuously monitored.
The combustion efficiency, gaseous emissions and residual matter composition were measured for the various fuel blends, considering also the excess air ratio effects. Ash samples, collected during the co-combustion tests, were analysed, at AUTh-CPERI, in an ICP-AES spectrophotometer for heavy metals. Furthermore, a qualitative assessment for the ash deposition propensity, including measurements of the characteristic ash-fusibility temperatures of various fuel blends was accomplished. The results obtained, proved that waste wood addition in the fuel blend, up to a certain percentage, is feasible. Furthermore, the minimal ash content and sulphur percentage of waste wood contribute to the minimisation of ash agglomerates formation during the co-combustion with the low quality lignite
KeywordsCo-combustion greek lignite waste wood fluidised bed emissions ash agglomerates.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Marutzky R. Energiegewinnung aus Rest- und Gebrauchtholz, from Moderne Feuerungstechnik zur energetischen Verwertung von Holz und Holzaffallen, Springer- VDI-Verlag. 1997; 1–21.Google Scholar
- 2.CSFTA, Proceedings of THERMIE type A Workshop on Co-combustion of Waste Wood, Biomass and Lignite in Industrial Boilers. Possibilities-Perspectives, Thessaloniki, Greece, November 1999.Google Scholar
- 3.Singer G. (Editor) Combustion Fossil Power Systems, Combustion Engineering Inc., 1981.Google Scholar
- 4.Andre R., Gulyurtlu I., Jones R., Cabrita I. Characterisation of Wood Combustion in a Fluidised Bed. Biomass for Energy and Industry, 5th ECC, Edited by: G. Grassi, G. Gosse, G.dos Santos, 1990 Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
- 5.Borghard R., Lindau S., Neidel W. Hoyer L. Umweltfreundliche Verbrennung von nachwachsenden Biobrennstoffen in Wirbelschichtfeuerungen., Energieanwendung/Energie + Umwelttechnik, 42.Jg, Heft 11, November 1993, Deutcher Verlag fur Grundstoffindustrie, Leibzig/Stuttgart.Google Scholar
- 6.Kakaras E., Vourliotis P., Grammelis P. Biomass Co-combustion Experiments in CAFB Test Facilities. Final Report to EU Joule III Program “Operational Problems, Trace Emissions and By-Product Management for Industrial Biomass Co-Combustion.”, 1998Google Scholar
- 7.Saastamoinen J., Hamalainen J., Kilpinen P. Release of Nitrogen Compounds from Wood Particles During Pyrolysis, Clean Air IV, Lisbon, Portugal, 1997.Google Scholar
- Winter F., Wartha C, Hofbauer H. Characterization and Emissions of a Single Fuel Particles under Fluidized Bed Combustor Conditions, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Fuel Technology and Environmental Technology, Vienna University of Technology, Austria.Google Scholar
- 9.Kakaras E. Vourliotis P. Pollutant Emissions from Circulating Atmospheric Fluidized Beds, Journal of the Institute of Energy, March 1995; 68: 22–31.Google Scholar
- 11.Skodras G., Spanos K., Samaras P., Vourliotis P., Grammelis P., Kakaras E. Sakellaropoulos G.P. Co-combustion of Biomass-Waste wood-Lignite Blends in Industrial Power Plants — Environmental Impacts, Mid-term Seminar, COST E9 — Life cycle assessment of forestry and forest products - WG3: End of life - Recycling, disposal and energy production, March 27–29, 2000, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar