Abstract
Chapters 2 and 3 reviewed common biological mechanisms linking parental drug-abuse and significant increased risk of serious structural and/or functional anomalies in the offspring. It was emphasized that drug-abuse, being predominantly a consequence of poverty, social alienation and biological ignorance, is a matter of personal and collective responsibility. A counterproductive, judgmental attitude is not the most effective method of reducing preventable disability — raising standards of living and providing the empowering qualities of high caliber education is. The present chapter, as it reviews the relationship between the so-called ‘natural’ methods of contraception and increased risk of serious congenital anomalies, continues the theme of shared reflection and shared responsibility.
Procreation in our species is so haphazard that only in the last few decades people started to pay attention to the intact and potentially perfect survival of the offspring. Previously, it was considered an Act of God that carried off a large number of the infants born alive and left many of the rest permanently damaged. Only in this century have people started to question such a fatalistic approach and look to ways of reducing perinatal mortality and morbidity.
Prepregnancy Care: A Manual for Practice. Edited by G. Chamberlain & J. Lumley. John Wiley & Son, Chichester, UK; 1986; page 1.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Selected Bibliography
Baird, D. A fifth freedom. British Medical Journal 11:1965;1141–1148.
Bracken, M. & Vita, K. Frequency of non-hormonal contraception around conception and association with congenital malformations in offspring. American Journal of Epidemiology 117:1983;281–291.
Cook, R. Human rights law and safe motherhood. European Journal of Health Law 5:1998;357–375.
Chamberlain, G. & Lumley, J. (Eds). Prepregnancy Care: A Manual of Practice. Portsmouth, John Wiley 1986.
Delhanty, J. & Handyside, A. The Origin of Genetic Defects in the Human and Their Detection in the Pre-Implantation Embryo. In: Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology Volume 17. H.M. Charlton (Ed). Oxford, Oxford University Press 1995 pp 125–157.
Holloway, M. Synopsis of “a global view”. Scientific American 271:1994;66–73.
Jacobs, P. & Hassold, T. The Origin of Numerical Chromosome Abnormalities. In: Advances in Genetics Volume 33. J.C. Hall & J.C. Dunlap (Eds). San Diego, Academic Press 1995 pp 101–133.
Jongbloet, P., Poestkoke, A., Hamers, A. & Van Erkelenszwets, J. Down syndrome and religious groups. The Lancet ii:1978; 1310.
Jongbloet, P. The aging gamete in relation to birth control failures and Down Syndrome. European Journal of Pediatrics 144:1985;343–347.
Jongbloet, P. Prepregnancy Care: Background Biological Effects. In: Prepregnancy Care — A Manual of Practice. Portsmouth, John Wiley 1986.
Jongbloet, P. Aging gametes in relation to incidence, gender, and twinning in Down Syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics 42:1992;855.
Khoury, M. & Wagener, D. Epidemiological evaluation of the use of genetics to improve the predictive value of disease risk factors. American Journal of Human Genetics 56:1995;835–844.
Kincaid-Smith, P. The Fifth Freedom. Bioethics 9:1995;183–191.
Meites, J. & Lu, J. Reproductive Aging and Neuroendocrine Function. In: Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology Volume 16. H.M. Charlton (Ed). Oxford, Oxford University Press 1994 pp 215–247.
Milstein-Moscati, I. & Becak, W. Occurrence of Down Syndrome and human sexual behavior. American Journal of Medical Genetics 9:1981;211–217.
Papiernik, E., Spirpira, A., Bomsel-Helmreich, O. & Lebel, S. Ovarian overripeness and intrauterine growth retardation. The Lancet, ii: 1979;1025–1026.
Pearce, F. Sin’s City: Family planning in the Philippines has been driven underground. New Scientist 162:1999;52–53.
Read, S. The distribution of Down Syndrome. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research 26:1982;215–227.
Ryder, B. & Campbell, H. Natural family planning in the 1990s. The Lancet 346:1995;233–234.
Seibel, M., Smith, D., Levesque, L., Borten, M. & Taymor M. The temporal relationship between the luteinizing hormone surge and human oocyte maturation. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 142:1982;568–572.
The Ad Hoc Committee on Genetic Testing/Insurance Issues Background Statement. Genetic Testing and Insurance. American Journal of Human Genetics 56:1995;327–331.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pollard, I. (2002). Ovulatory Method of Birth Control. In: Life, Love and Children. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0278-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0278-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5000-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0278-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive