Skip to main content

Evolving Neural Networks: Selected Medical Applications and the Effects of Variation Operators

  • Chapter
Modeling and Simulation: Theory and Practice

Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms can be used to train and design neural networks for medical applications. This paper reviews some recent efforts in breast cancer detection using evolutionary neural networks. The results obtained are discussed in relation to other methods for analyzing similar data. Additional basic research data are presented that investigate the use of alternative forms of variation on neural networks (e.g., mutation and recombination). Mention is given to the inspiration that Walter Karplus provided to the author in applying computational intelligence methods to practical problems in medicine and other disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Lippmann. “An Introduction to Computing with Neural Nets”. IEEE ASSP Magazine, 4–22 April, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe and H. White. “Multilayer Feedforward Networks are Universal Approximators”. Neural Networks, 2:359–366, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Poggio and F. Girosi. “Networks for Approximation and Learning”. Proc. of the IEEE, 78:9, 1481–1497, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D.B. Fogel. Evolutionary Computation: Toward a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence. 2nd ed., IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.B. Fogel and P.K. Simpson. “Experiments with Evolving Fuzzy Clusters”. Proc. of 2nd Ann. Conf. on Evolutionary Programming, D.B. Fogel and W. Atmar (eds.), Evolutionary Programming Society, La Jolla, CA, 90–97, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. B. Fogel. System Identification through Simulated Evolution. Ginn Press, Needham, MA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.B. Fogel, L.J. Fogel and V.W. Porto. “Evolving Neural Networks”. Biological Cybernetics, 63:6, 487–493, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V.W. Porto, D.B. Fogel and L.J. Fogel. “Experiments with Alternative Neural Network Training Methods: Back Propagation, Simulated Annealing and Evolutionary Programming”. IEEE Expert, 10(3): 16–22, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D.B. Fogel. “An Information Criterion for Optimal Neural Network Selection”. IEEE Trans, on Neural Networks, 2:5, 490–497, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. http://breastcancer.about.com (see subpages as well).

  11. C.C. Boring, T.S. Squires and T. Tong. “Cancer statistics”. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 43:7–26, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Strax. Make Sure You Do Not Have Breast Cancer. St. Martin’s, NY, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y.Z. Wu, M.L. Giger, K. Doi, C.J. Vyborny, R.A. Schmidt and C.E. Metz. “Artificial Neural Networks in Mammography: Application to Decision Making in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer”. Radiology, 187:81–87, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Tabar and P.B. Dean. Teaching Atlas of Mammography. 2nd ed., Thieme-Stratton, NY, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.E. Floyd, J.Y. Lo, A.J. Yun, D.C Sullivan and P.J. Kornguth. “Prediction of Breast Cancer Malignancy Using an Artificial Neural Network”. Cancer, 74:2944–2998, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Wilding, M.A. Morgan, A.E. Grygotis, M.A. Shoffner and E.F. Rosato. “Application of Backpropagation Neural Networks to Diagnosis of Breast and Ovarian Cancer”. Cancer Lett., 77:145–153, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D.B. Fogel, E.C. Wasson, E.M. Boughton and V.W. Porto. “A Step Toward Computer-assisted Mammography Using Evolutionary Programming and Neural Networks”. Cancer Lett., 119:93–97, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J.A. Baker, P.J. Kornguth, J.Y. Lo, M.E. Williford and C.E. Floyd. “Breast Cancer: Prediction with Artificial Neural Networks Based on BI-RADS Standardized Lexicon”. Radiology, 196:817–822, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D.B. Fogel, E.C. Wasson, E.M. Boughton and V.W. Porto. “Evolving Artificial Neural Networks for Screening Features from Mammograms”. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 14:317–326, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D.B. Fogel, E.C. Wasson and E.M. Boughton. “Evolving Neural Networks for Detecting Breast Cancer”. Cancer Lett., 96:49–53, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O.L. Mangasarian and W.H. Wolberg. “Cancer diagnosis via linear programming. SIAM News, 23:1–18, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K.P. Bennett and O.L. Mangasarian. “Robust Linear Programming Discrimination of Two Linearly Inseparable Sets”. Optimization Methods Software, 1: 22–34, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  23. W.H. Wolberg and O.L. Mangasarian. “Multisurface Method of Pattern Separation for Medical Diagnosis Applied To Breast Cytology”. PNAS, 87:9193–9196, 1990.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Zhang. “Selecting Typical Instances in Instance-based Learning”. Proc. 9th Int. Machine Learning Conf, D. Sleeman and P. Edwards, eds., Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 470–479, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Holland. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Univ. Mich. Press, Ann Arbor, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D.B. Fogel and A. Ghozeil. “A Note on Representations and Variation Operators”. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, 1(2): 159–161, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D.H. Wolpert and W.G. Macready. “No Free Lunch Theorems for Optimization”. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, 1(1): 67–82, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. G. Rudolph. “Reflections on Bandit Problems and Selection Methods in Uncertain Environments”. Proc. 7th Intern. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, T. Baeck (ed.), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 166–173, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  29. W.G. Macready and D.H. Wolpert. “Bandit Problems and the Exploration/Exploitation Tradeoff”. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, 2:1, 2–22, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. L. Altenberg. “The Schema Theorem and Price’s Theorem”. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 3, L.D. Whitley and M.D. Vose (eds.), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 23–49, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D.B. Fogel. “Phenotypes, Genotypes, and Operators”. Proc. 1995 IEEE International Conf. on Evolutionary Computation, Perth, Australia, IEEE, 193–198, 1995.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. K. Chellapilla and D.B. Fogel. “Fitness Distributions in Evolutionary Computation: Analysis of Noisy Functions”. Applications and Science of Computational Intelligence II, K.L. Priddy, P.E. Keller, D.B. Fogel, and J.C. Bezdek (chairs), SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 313–323, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. K. Chellapilla and D.B. Fogel. “Fitness Distributions in Evolutionary Computation: Motivation and Examples in the Continuous Domain”. BioSystems, 54(1–2), 15–29, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. P. Nordin and W. Banzhaf. “Complexity Compression and Evolution”. Proc. 6th Intern. Conf. Genetic Algorithms, L. Eshelman (ed.), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 310–317, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  35. A. Jain and D.B. Fogel. “Case Studies in Applying Fitness Distributions in Evolutionary Algorithms. I. Simple Neural Networks and Gaussian Mutation”. Applications and Science of Computational Intelligence III, D.B. Fogel, K.L. Priddy, and P.E. SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  36. D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton and J.L. McClelland. “A General Framework for Parallel Distributed Processing”. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, D.E. Rumelhart and J.L. McClelland (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1: 45–76, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  37. P.J. Angeline, G.M. Saunders J.B. Pollack. “An Evolutionary Algorithm that Constructs Neural Networks”. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 5(1): 54–65, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. X. Yao. “Evolving Neural Networks”. Proc. IEEE, 87:9, 1423–1447, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fogel, D.B. (2003). Evolving Neural Networks: Selected Medical Applications and the Effects of Variation Operators. In: Bekey, G.A., Kogan, B.Y. (eds) Modeling and Simulation: Theory and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0235-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0235-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4979-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0235-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics